User talk:Hackajar

Welcome!

Hello, Hackajar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 00:32, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jack-Carter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jack-Carter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking warning

Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. --HarryCane 12:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha! Thanks for the 'warning' Hackajar 12:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --HarryCane 12:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P!atD query

Look, if you take a look at the suggestion I made on Talk:Panic! at the Disco, that was a whole day before you voted on the The_Only_Difference_Between_Martyrdom_And_Suicide_Is_Press_Coverage deletion debate. And even if it wasn't, I couldn't care less what for or if at all you voted. If you would also look at my contributions history, I reverted your edits to the Panic! at the Disco article before I even took a look at your talk page and saw you blanked it — I didn't even know you voted on the deletion debate. Not because of my so-called "disinterest in one user", but because you made a whole mess of the discography, I reverted your changes. Here are some of your mistakes:

"#24 Australia" shouldn't be in the column U.K. album-chart position

A general mistake Hackajar 13:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

excessive overlinking of years

Comes with the template Hackajar 13:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

excessive overlinking of A Fever You Can't Sweat Out

Really? Hackajar 13:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why making a U.S. and U.K. sales column with no content?

Did you ever think that I was doing research currently? I could see you reverting after no content over 2 hours or so! Do I need to put a "this article is being worked on" warning just for YOU? This is the first time I've ran across a user as active as you, yet lacking in understanding of wiki media! Hackajar 13:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you made a seperate section for "Other Charts" (which btw shouldn't be capitalised), thus listing every single twice, even though "Lying Is the Most Fun a Girl Can Have without Taking Her Clothes Off" didn't chart on any other charts

See above, still working on getting information! Hackajar 13:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand, I did none of these edits to spite you, only to constructively add to the article's appearance and clarity. If you want to make these kinds of changes, you need to discuss it on the talk page first, especially when a discussion concerning the matter has already been started. --HarryCane 12:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First off, just to be clear, what template are you talking about that automatically pipe-links the years (against Wikipedia guidelines, see WP:PIPE), because there is none on the Panic! at the Disco page? Also, how am I supposed to know that you are still working on the article, when your last edit summary reads "Final Cleanup"? I'm sorry that you haven't encountered a dedicated and thorough editor in your five months of active editing, yet I don't know what you mean when you say I'm "lacking in understanding of wiki media". Still, if you're going to make a table for the singles (like in the example pages you listed), please stick to your choice. Don't make another list with all the singles below the table. That's just bad style, not "standard chart format", at least none of your examples uses it. Either include all chart positions, or omit unnotable ones, but don't make two lists. And as for the "point-of-view" spam: The uncited two paragraphs in the lead section you added, on how the band's "popularity is bound by temporality, market hype and transient popular trends" and so on ([1]) — full of weasel words and definitely POV.

WTF is this? not my edit! Hackajar 15:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The link I posted --> ([2]) <-- begs to differ. --HarryCane 16:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is due to YOUR revert that crap got cought up in my discog edits. I could care less about their looks, only wikify to article Hackajar 16:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, regarding what you wrote on my talk page, who said you were "some snooty wiki squatter"? And why am I supposed to google your name? To see that you are a hacker? Are you trying to intimidate me? --HarryCane 15:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buhahahha...OK I'm done, no, not that "I'm a hacker", that you should give me a little more credit then a 2nd year college student at German University that can't keep a punk band togeather long enough to make any good music Hackajar 15:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That really made me laugh. You seriously have too much time on your hands. There are loads of google hits on harrycane, including a German DJ, some Arabic and Russian sites, if you digged deep enough, who knows maybe you'll find a porn site, you seriously think that's all me? --HarryCane 16:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Federline

The problem with protecting it is that it would be a preemptive protect, which is used in very rare circumstances (i.e. Colbert). Protection is meant to stop an issue that is growing grossly out of control. Hilary Duff, Lindsay Lohan, and other articles deal with more vandalism but are still unprotected. Part of this has to do with the amount of "eyes" watching it. I've added this page to my watchlist and will protect if a serious issue is approaching. Thanks, Yank sox 11:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem. Protection is a pretty controversal issue, and is supposed to be used sparingly. Again, if you need anything drop a message. Yank sox 11:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! Hackajar 11:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]