User talk:24.215.152.197

3RR on World Wide Fund for Nature

You are in danger of violating WP:3RR on World Wide Fund for Nature because of your insertion of inaccurate information. Please cease this activity. - Chadbryant 13:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you 3RR first. Please cease your activity, and these conflicts will evaporate.

Also, the information is perfectly accurate. You have not given any counterevidence, and have been unresponsive when asked to do so. I ask you again either to do so, or stop your reverting.

You have been reported for violating WP:3RR on World Wide Fund for Nature. - Chadbryant 07:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

24.215.152.197 08:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)I have not reverted the page 3 times in 24 hours. You are mistaken yet again. Please reconsider your attitude.[reply]

24.215.152.197 09:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC):You have also been reported for violating WP:3RR on World Wide Fund for Nature. The difference is that, unlike myself, you really did violate the rule. I do this only under protest of your unexplained actions, and your misrepresentation of my comments.[reply]

From WP:3RR:

Please remember that the 3RR applies to reverts after the third within a 24 hour period (not calendar day); it also does not include self reverts, and reverts to deal with simple vandalism

- Chadbryant 09:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked at the report, I note that there have been no reverts on the page for two days. I'm therefore going to give you one last warning and note that you will be blocked if you break the Three revert rule again, no matter how you feel you may have been provoked. Please click on the above link and familiarise yourself with the policy. Robdurbar 07:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chadbryant

If he's falsely reported you, then obviously it will be dismissed. If he's committed a 3RR of his own, then you can report him. If an admin has taken an action, then it's the admin's responsibility. He may have been to the point, but not uncivil. So the viable complaints are:

has reverted correct information on multiple pages without a helpful explanation,
has sent multiple messages to me misattributing Wikipedia rules
He has cited a problem with my anonymous IP identity

Perhaps you'd like to provide me with diffs to substantiate each of these points. Tyrenius 09:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chadbryant reported for WP:3RR on World Wide Fund for Nature

Thanks for the note, but I don't check 3RR violations, so I don't need to know. I'm sure the admins that oversee 3RR will be able to handle the situation without my help. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 11:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.