Jump to content

User talk:Viscious81

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) at 18:36, 23 August 2006 (Flying Spaghetti Monster). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Archive
Archives
  1. July 2006 – August 2006

--nids 23:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC) nidhish

Welcome!

Tamil Nadu/South India

If you want to know anything about Tamil Nadu / South India you can ask me. I am just an ordinary user and not an adminDoctor Bruno 17:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your constructive edits on caste.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this is harappa

Thanks for calling.I m not aware of MF hussains painting you were refering to . Both Ranganayakamma and Arudra are 'high Brahmins' as Dab would like to classify normal honest human beings.Ranganayakamma won state Sahitya Academy award in 1966. I believe , you are an honest guy and Sundar says you mean no harm.Did you see it at any of the Art ehibitions. Or is it just hearsay? I would like to have a copy of the jpg if you have it just for the heck of it. We have Raja Ravi Varma, drawing the Sita Apaharanam : Sita literally and physically lifted by Ravan. Many devout people stated that it could not have been like that.Ravan would have been burnt to ashes ... Sin or sleaze is like beauty. It is in the eyes of the beholder. That is what all artists and writers claim.I am neither.Godspeed.harappa 10:17, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dead sure.

'even you seem to agree, atleast in your user page, that you can be a hindu and a athiest'. I do not just seem to agree, I am an atheist, on my user page and everywhere else, and have a right to be like that, and like B.G.Tilak said nobody can take away that right from me (actually nobody is taking it away either), and still love Hinduism and India, and take lessons from Indian mythology. Visit me at http://www.wikihindu.ipbfree.org. Aupmanyav 09:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manu Smriti

Regarding your newspaper clipping of the absense of the Dalits in the original Smritis, could you please edit your contribution into the article? Thank you and have a nice day.Netaji 21:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try and find out if this is allowed. Can you provide me with the name of the newspaper and the date of the article and I can go to my univ library archives and look for a microfilm of it or something. Thanks.Netaji 22:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I have seen citations to articles that are no longer available online on wikipedia. Therefore, if you cite your source according to the rules on Wikipedia:Citing_sources there should be no problems. Netaji 22:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Babri Mosque

Continue to watch the page. If you are in danger of 3RR message myself or Netaji or D-boy.Bakaman Bakatalk 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your suggestions, but i would like to stick to 1RR and not resort to revert wars. it would be better if we complain to admin if he just reverts without reason.nids 21:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A new user User:AAhmed has popped up, vandalizing the page. Just giving a heads-up.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re Lakshya

hi, i don't know about which hero/peak they wanted to depict because frankly I haven't seen that movie myself. According to many, including imdb, it's a loose fiction based on either Vikram Batra and/or Anuj Nayyar. If it is based on the former then it should be point 5140 and if it is the latter then it is point 4875. I think the movie was taken more to showcase a story based on fact rather than rigidly stick to historical details unlike LOC:Kargil which was largely historically correct but IMO was also largely boring and too long. Just as a side note I am actually not a big bollywood buff and but for the film "Border" few movies on Indian wars are both accurate (to a fair extent) and entertaining. --Idleguy 09:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Persecution of Hindus on wiki

If you have any spare time, you may want to check this link. In that link, a user is trying to get us banned. This same user User:TerryJ-Ho has called users like us "fascists" and has called Hindu wikipedians "Hindu taliban".Bakaman Bakatalk 16:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He got blocked today. Bakaman Bakatalk 01:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dalitstan

Nidhish,

You wrote:site is opening, no ban exists in india

Are you sure you can open http://www.dalitstan.org web-site?

I think it went off its main servers a few months ago, thus the ban was meaningless. However some of its contents on other servers is still present. The links inserted in the article are to archived contents!

--Vikramsingh 02:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Spaghetti Monster

It'd be fine if the reference said something like "here's a cloud formation that looks like the FSM", rather than reporting it as an actual sighting (which is what the user did). There are enough people complaining that this article is unencyclopedic as it is that we need to make sure that the tone remains neutral. Thanks, NawlinWiki 18:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Viscious81&oldid=71432009"