User talk:Bobet

archive 1 - September 20, 2005 - February 17, 2006
archive 2 - - August 17, 2006

No Consensus

Would you mind explaining what you mean by "No Consensus" with regards to the AfD decision for Philica?

It means there's no strong consensus to either delete or keep the article, and it therefore defaults to getting kept, but there's nothing to stop it from getting nominated again (as opposed to a 'keep'-result, where the article usually should not get nominated again with the same reasoning). In this case, I'm pretty sure someone will nominate the article for deletion again pretty soon unless its notability is clearly established, since the 'keep' comments had weak reasonings behind them and the article itself doesn't back them up. - Bobet 11:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I've copied your reply here in case you don't check my Talk page. Anyway, will you please be more specific on how notability is clearly established? Please do not refer me to the AfD info page -- it's tres ambiguous, and albeit there are tons of people handing out AfD nom's, no one seems to care about making the exact criteria obvious and clear -- just give me a brief listing off the top of your head the criteria you use for clearly settling AfD disputes. Also, other than being a stub, how does the article not back up the reasonings mentioned for keep? Yosofun 04:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Removing the uncategorized tags

Thank you for informing me about this. I thought that as long as an article as a category, even it is a stub category, I would be able to remove the {{uncategorized}} tags. Please let me know if I make anymore mistakes in my editing in the future. Thanks! --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 17:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bobet

Hi. Just because four people think it meets the notability requirements doesn't mean it does. I have pointed out why it doesn't meet the notability requirements. It falls under the exceptions ("price listings in product catalogues, or listings on software download sites"). As far as the validity of sources, InsidePulse is a fansite ran by fans; it doesn't qualify. At absolute positively MOST there are two web sites (and that's pushing it; IGN is really the only really reputable one) that we have found which cover the game and can be considered reputable web sites. The requirements in WP:SOFTWARE state "multiple non-trivial published works." As far as I can see, my standing as a responsible Wikipedian should hold some degree of merit against the concerns of these three or four anonymous editors who disagree with the inclusion of the tags.JB196 20:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crying Fist

Hi. I had looked at the review before I re-added it. It seemed to be a decent review with information not in the Wik article. I don't know any-thing else about the reviewer and aren't sure why You call him/her a spammer. But if You have a better review link, go ahead and make a switch. Kdammers 10:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't put the link in originally, so I can't vouch for the reasons it was included. I can only speak for my quick take on the review after noting that a review had been deleted. As far as names go, I don't think "Google" is a very serious sounding name - Internet names are nothing I use in making judgments about sites. Kdammers 10:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Woughton/Woughton on the Green

Thanks for fixing my move to Woughton. I know that a cut and paste move is deprecated but didn't believe it important enough to ask for admin support. Let me know if it is actually more important than it seems. Also, do I need to do anything to the interwiki links? --Concrete Cowboy 12:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried moving (like you said, I expected a simple redirect to give way but it didn't). Ok, now I see why it is important to move the history too. --Concrete Cowboy 12:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Legion page move

I got confused at first. I was unaware of the amount of steps involved on this. Best wishes, E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 09:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it just had to have its history merged before the pagemove was completed, for clarity's sake. - Bobet 09:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. Cheers, E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 09:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Hotel Priština

I need to revert a page I moved after misunderstanding a particular user's comments (very poor English) in the article talk page. Though the name of the town in En.Wikipedia is Priština (see current RQM debate at Talk:Priština, the official name of the hotel is Grand Hotel Prishtina, using Albanian language transliteration. I tried to revert it myself but it does not seem to be possible somehow. I would appreciate your help on this if you can. Regards, E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 16:34, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. - Bobet 17:17, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your prompt action once again. E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 17:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]