User:FonUi
Varejao edits
Refrain from rolling back to earlier versions of the page which serve to obfuscate the article's objectivity or mislead the reader with sub-standard references and a poorly presented information. As explained in my edit summaries, two of your sources are not from reliable news sites, but are the opinions or viewpoints of individuals. They do not warrant inclusion as citations for the facts. Facts are to be presented as facts, opinions are to be presented as opinions. Your version makes no mention of the fact that your sources are biased. This is not acceptable for wikipedia. Thank you, --Downwards 08:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Reply:
you claim that: "Your version makes no mention of the *fact* that your *sources are biased*"
1) This is only your subjective opinion. You cannot call your opinion a *fact*.
2) You are saying that www.nba.com/cavaliers (cavaliers' official site) is biased against a cavaliers' player, which is quite counter-intuitive. In addition you call this a *fact*.
3) The only *fact* is the video of the incident (which you didnt want to have on the page). Any other article discribing the incident is subject to personal interpretations.
4) The vast majority of the edits in the article are presenting the same view of the incident with mine and of the sources I am citing. Being the only one that consistently contradicts this view and reverts to your own version of the article, you are violating wikipedia's popularity rule.
5) Your claims on obfuscating the article and misleading the readers are posed without any reasoning.
It would be nice to resolve this dispute peacefully, without having to enter a wiki-war (where the article is moving on now). For this purpose exists wikipedia's "dispute" tag and the discussion part of the article, where we should move and try to resolve this dispute. Regards,
STOP PUTTING YOUR OPINIONS ON ARTICLES
Hi there - are you aware of the three revert rule? You're up to two.
Quit adding your opinions on the Anderson Varejao site. In your edit summary you mention "cheating" -- but where in the article does it say anything about "cheating"? You've made your agenda clear. NO OPINIONS!!!!!
Reply:
I am supporting everything I write with appropriate sources I am not posing my opinion. I am aware of 3RR, you are the one who started reverting my article on sportsmanship. If you disagree with the article mark it as disputed and explain ur reasons on the discussion part. Brute force approaches will not take us anywhere.