Jump to content

Talk:Cloyne Court Hotel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gwalla (talk | contribs) at 23:34, 31 October 2004 (vote: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Borderline. What do people think? I didn't think this was notable enough for an article, so I merged and redirected it to University of California, Berkeley. It was summarily bounced back by User:Jiang with the edit comment "(Housing - rm section; single co-op does not deserve special mention; maybe deserve article since on natl register of historic places?)" But this is not an article about a building, it is an article about a housing unit and its role in the culture of a university. If it's not worth mentioning in the article about the university, is it worth its own article? Remove the university-related material and you have a substub about a borderline-notable building. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 16:08, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC) P. S. Do take a peek at the Original version.

  • Delete. I think the original red and blue links must spell something in Morse code, but I'm too apathetic to find out. [[User:Noisy|Noisy | Talk]] 17:12, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC) Change to neutral, having read the link from Jiang. I think that there could be the basis for an article, here. [[User:Noisy|Noisy | Talk]] 18:56, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete; either that or I'll put up an article on how I pay my mortgage and (very occasionally) clean house. — Bill 17:45, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not sufficiently notable. The housing arrangement and building are both of insufficient note Gurdonark 17:57, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment: #92001718 on the National Register of Historic Places. Info on its history can be found here. Other buildings have articles, eg, Cory Hall. If this is to be kept, the university-related material is relevant but it needs text on what it was before it became a co-op. --Jiang 18:19, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment. Note: this is not an argument for deletion. But it does bear on the question of the degree of notability conferred by being listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The total number of listings is about 78,000; see National Register of Historic Places Searches are available here: http://www.nr.nps.gov/nrloc1.htm I searched on Berkeley, CA. Cloyne Court Hotel is indeed listed, dated 1992-12-24. The total number of listings in Berkeley, CA is 56. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 23:49, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Neutral: I suspect that there is potential to write a worthwhile article about this building, but this is not yet it. -- Jmabel | Talk 03:10, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. The National Register is too broad for our usage. --Improv 13:35, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand, there's probably room for a article here with a different focus. --Goobergunch 21:24, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Seems like there is potential, keep siroχo 08:36, Oct 31, 2004 (UTC)
  • National Register is reason enough to keep it, if someone could please add that to the article ... - David Gerard 12:25, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Expand. On the National Register of Historic Places, therefore notable. Stub is decent. Gwalla | Talk 23:34, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)