Jump to content

Talk:Military science

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Khendon (talk | contribs) at 09:57, 25 September 2002. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is the first crack at this topic. My question, is this page a good place for this discussion? The reason I am placing it here, is because I am seeking to cover tactics, op art, and strategy together as a whole. This is military theory, and is just a part of the overall science. Should the topic be split off into other pages, or is that going to risk splintering the entire area into shards so small, it will be next to impossible to get the entire picture? Thoughts?

Another question. Should the info here also be cross posted into the specific sections (and vice versa) on strategy, op art, and tactics? Or is this needlessly cluttering the 'pedia..... Dobbs 15:39 Sep 17, 2002 (UTC)

I'd go with putting most of the stuff in the individual tactics/opart/strategy sections. Things that are common to all three areas, or that describe how the three fit together, should go in here IMO. And I'd certainly not be in favour of redundant "cross posting" - not only is it clutter, but the fragments are likely to get out of step - Khendon 12:24 Sep 24, 2002 (UTC)

Sorry, wrong post. Then I had to leave town to attend a funeral.  :( At least I got the article done. This was the outline for Strategy, which needs to be better linked with Operational Art, and tactics..... More in those sections to follow. Thanks for your edit, sorry I screwed up. Please take a look at the new stuff and tell me what you think.

Dobbs 21:53 Sep 24, 2002 (UTC)

Looks really good! :-) - Khendon 09:57 Sep 25, 2002 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Military_science&oldid=731335"