Jump to content

User talk:Luna Santin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Luna Santin (talk | contribs) at 08:39, 11 September 2006 (O'Reilly double-standard: -d). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


TalkSandboxBlog


  Welcome to my talk page! I'll sometimes reply on your talk, but will frequently (increasingly often) reply here.
When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps:
• Use a ==descriptive heading==
• Use [[wikilinks]] when mentioning users and pages
• Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date
If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia or frequently asked questions.

Click here to leave me a message

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.

LA's userbox consolidation discussion; a side project I occassionally help out with, to reduce the number of superfluous userboxes.


Admin

A shiny new mop for you! Have fun with the new buttons -- Samir धर्म 07:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You're now an administrator. Two pages you might find useful are the administrators' reading list and the administrators' how-to guide. Good luck with your new role. Angela. 15:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was the first to see this! 'Grats. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well done. enochlau (talk) 15:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Those vandals won't stand a chance! :) --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 19:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hooray! jam es(talk) 22:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'FUCK YES' YOU WILL TOTALLY PWN THE VANDALS NOW BUDDY! :D --CableModem 03:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You'll definitely be a very good admin. :) --WinHunter (talk) 08:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CTho's Userpage

Just an FYI — I know CTho personally, and my edit was not vandalism. He's added it back in himself, albeit on a subpage :) Brock256 21:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry >.< i suck

thanks though...and my question was only for help creating the pageSuperme 23:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for the Vandalism Patrol...Sahaj Marg

Gee! I have seem this Wikipedia system at work and it's great!! Thanks so much for your "interception". Information will set us free! I can now believe it!! I have been to the Mountain and I have seen the face of G.. NO! just kidding...LOL

I am now a "bigger booster" of Wikipedia...Everyone in my circle (seniors) told me this Encyclopedia would never work!! I now have some evidence that it does and on the "honour" or "anarchically"...LOL I wonder if we can now push for "voting on line and on issues in a "DIRECT DEMOCRACY"??? HMMMM! The revolution has begun....Information is now in the hands of the "masses"...Rise up, Rise up....LOL...

4d-don

What is with it

Anita934 how many has she created? Sugarpinet 01:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning she won't be creating any more accounts for a while due to the fact he's created 5 or 6 accounts. I heard somewhere you have to wait 24 more hours to create another one. Is that right? Also, I'll let you know if she comes back tommorow. Can you add Template:Indefblockuser to all of them? Sugarpinet 01:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!!

Thank you for blocking Great_American_Football_Genius AND Rzandy just in time!

@kshay 07:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page.--Andeh 08:01, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O'Reilly double-standard

Hello, you unfairly blocked me from editing O'Reilly and called what I did vandalism. This is nonsense. What I added was well-cited and demonstrably more balanced than what was there. You're also not enforcing the 3R rule for people who are changing MY additions even though, as all is extensively documented, there's no hint of a libel possibility. You make repeated references to civility but only a fool thinks being civilized only refers to omitting words middle-class assholes find offensive. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.116.69 (talkcontribs) 08:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Nevertheless, you did violate WP:3RR, and very probably do need to read over WP:CIV. You're more than welcome to file a report at WP:AN3 if you feel other editors should be blocked for similar reasons. Luna Santin 08:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]