Jump to content

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-08-20 Jacob Neusner article

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CQJ (talk | contribs) at 13:36, 19 September 2006 (Mediator response: closing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
ArticleJacob Neusner
Statusopen
Request dateUnknown
Requesting partyUnknown
Parties involvedmultiple anon IP addresses
Mediator(s)CQJ (talk · contribs)
CommentAnon IP addresses continuing an edit/revert war against policy and consensus.

Mediation Case: 2006-08-20 Jacob Neusner article

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.


Request Information

Request made by: Tim Tam 04:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Tim Tam[reply]
Where is the issue taking place?

The article "Jacob Neusner"

Archives

General information on this article/case was transferred to the archives to expedite handling. This page is now home for the discussion of sandbox edit changes to the Jacob Neusner article.

Mediator response

My eyes hurt from all of that reading. Jacob Neusner article tagged for wikification and cleanup at the present. Any mediator that's interested in picking this case up, please do so. CQJ 14:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted. Response at article discussion page. CQJ 18:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Closed per requestor's comment here. CQJ 13:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.