Jump to content

Smooth projective plane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rboedi (talk | contribs) at 16:48, 31 July 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:New unreviewed article

Smooth projective planes are special projective planes. The most prominent example of a smooth projective plane is the real projective plane . Its geometric operations of joining two distinct points by a line and of intersecting two lines in a point are not only continuous but even smooth (infinitely differentiable=C). Similarly, the classical planes over the complex numbers, the quaternions, and the octonions are smooth planes. These are not the only such planes, however. In general, a smooth projective plane is defined as follows: the point space and the line space are smooth manifolds and both geometric operations of joining and intersecting are smooth. Obviously, the geometric operations of a smooth planes are continuous; hence each smooth plane is a compact topological plane.[1] 42.4. Smooth planes exist only with point spaces of dimension where , because this is true for compact connected projective topological planes, see [2] or [3] 54.11. Further down, these four cases will be treated separately.

Theorem. The point manifold of a smooth projective plane is homeomorphic to its classical counterpart, and so is the line manifold, see [4].

Automorphisms play a crucial rôle in the study of smooth planes. A bijection of the point set of a projecive plane is called a collineation if it maps lines onto lines. The continuous collineations of a compact projective plane form the group . This group will always be taken with the topology of uniform convergence. By [5] a remarkable fact holds:

Theorem. If is a smooth plane, then each continuous collineation of is smooth; in other words, the group of automorphisms of a smooth plane coincides with . Moreover, is a smooth Lie transformation group of and of .

The automorphism groups of the four classical planes are simple Lie groups of dimension or , respectively. All other smooth planes have much smaller groups, see below.

A projective plane is called a translation plane if its automorphism group has a subgroup which fixes each point on some line and acts sharply transitive on the set of points not on .

Translation planes. Every smooth projective translation plane is isomorphic to one of the four classical planes, see [6]

This shows that there are many compact connected topological projective planes which are not smooth. On the other hand, the following construction [7] yields even real analytic non-Desarguesian planes of dimension , , and with a compact group of automorphisms of dimension , , and respectively: represent points and lines in the usual way by homogeneous coordinates over the real or complex numbers or the quaternions, say by vectors of length . Then incidence of the point and the line is defined by , where is a fixed real parameter such that . Obviously, these planes are self-dual.

2-dimensional planes. Compact -dimensional projective planes can be described in the following way: the point space is a compact surface , each line is a Jordan curve in  (a closed subset homeomorphic to the circle), and any two distinct points are joined by a unique line. Then is homeomorphic to the point space of the real plane , any two distinct lines intersect in a unique point, and the geometric operations are continuous (apply.[8] §31 to the complement of a line). A familiar family of examples has been given by Moulton [9] in 1902, see also [10] §34. These planes are characterized by the fact that they have a -dimensional automorphism group. They are not isomorphic to a smooth plane [11]. More generally, all non-classical compact -dimensional planes such that are known explicitly; none of these is smooth:

Theorem. If is a smooth -dimensional plane and if , then is the classical real plane , see [12].

4-dimensional planes. All compact planes with a -dimnsional point space and have been classified, see [13] 74.27. Up to duality, they are either translation planes or they are isomorphic to a unique so-called shift plane ([14] §74). According to [15], this shift plane is not smooth. Hence the result on translation planes implies

Theorem. A smooth -dimensional plane is isomorphic to the classical complex plane, or , see [16]

8-dimensional planes. Compact -dimensional topological planes have been discussed in [17] Chapter 8 and more recently in [18]. Put . Either is the classical quaternion plane or . If , then is a translation plane or a dual translation plane or a Hughes plane ([19] 1.10). The latter can be characterized as follows: leaves some classical complex subplane invariant and induces on the connected component of its full automorphism group ([20] §86 or [21] 3.19). The Hughes planes are not smooth, see [22] or [23] 9.17. This yields a similar result as in the case of -dimensional planes:

Theorem. If is a smooth -dimensional plane, then is the classical quaternion plane or .

16-dimensional planes. Now let denote the automorphism group of a compact -dimensional topological projective plane . Either is the smooth classical octonion plane or . If , then fixes a line and a point , and the affine plane and its dual are translation planes, see [24] 87.7. If , then also fixes an incident point-line pair, but neither nor are known explicitly. Nevertheless none of these planes can be smooth ([25] or [26], cf. also [27] 9.18 for a sketch of the proof):

Theorem. If is a -dimensional smooth projective plane, then is the classical octonion plane or .

The last four results combine to the following

Main Theorem. If is the largest value of , where is a non-classical compact -dimensional topological projective plane, then whenever is even smooth.

Complex analytic planes. The condition that the geometric operations of a projective plane are complex analytic is very restrictive, in fact, it is satisfied only in the classical complex plane, see [28] or [29] 75.1.

Theorem. Every complex analytic projective plane is isomorphic as an analytic plane to the complex plane with its standard analytic structure.

References

  1. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter
  2. ^ R. L\"owen 1983 Topology and dimension of stable planes: On a conjecture of H. Freudenthal, J. reine angew. Math. ’’’343, 108--122
  3. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter
  4. ^ L. Kramer 1994 The topology of smooth projective planes, Arch. Math. 63, 85–91
  5. ^ R. Bödi 1998 Collineations of smooth stable planes, Forum Math. 10, 751–773
  6. ^ J. Otte 1995 Smooth Projective Translation Planes, Geom. Dedicata 58, 203–212
  7. ^ S. Immervoll 2003 Real analytic projective planes with large automorphism groups, Adv. Geom. 3, 163–176
  8. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter
  9. ^ F. R. Moulton 1902 A simple non-desarguesian plane geometry, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 3, 192–195
  10. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter
  11. ^ D. Betten 1971 -dimensionale differenzierbare projektive Ebenen, Arch. Math. 22, 304–309
  12. ^ R. Bödi, Smooth stable and projective planes, Thesis, Tübingen 1996; (www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/ab/Geometrie.alt/Smoothstableplanes.ps) (9.1)
  13. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter
  14. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter
  15. ^ R. Bödi, Smooth stable and projective planes, Thesis, Tübingen 1996; (www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/ab/Geometrie.alt/Smoothstableplanes.ps)Chapter 10
  16. ^ R. Bödi, Smooth stable and projective planes, Thesis, Tübingen 1996; (www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/ab/Geometrie.alt/Smoothstableplanes.ps) (10.11)
  17. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter
  18. ^ H. Salzmann 2014 Compact planes, mostly -dimensional. A retrospect, http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0304
  19. ^ H. Salzmann 2014 Compact planes, mostly -dimensional. A retrospect, http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0304
  20. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter
  21. ^ H. Salzmann 2003 Baer subplanes, Illinois J. Math. 47, 485–513
  22. ^ R. Bödi 1999 Smooth Hughes planes are classical, Arch. Math. 73, 73–80
  23. ^ H. Salzmann 2014 Compact planes, mostly -dimensional. A retrospect, http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0304
  24. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter
  25. ^ R. Bödi, Smooth stable and projective planes, Thesis, Tübingen 1996; (www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/ab/Geometrie.alt/Smoothstableplanes.ps) Chapter 12
  26. ^ R. Bödi 1998 -dimensional smooth projective planes with large collineation groups, Geom. Dedicata 72, 283–298
  27. ^ H. Salzmann 2014 Compact planes, mostly -dimensional. A retrospect, http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0304
  28. ^ S. Breitsprecher 1967 Einzigkeit der reellen und der komplexen projektiven Ebene, Math. Z. 99, 429–432
  29. ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes,  W. de Gruyter