Smooth projective plane
This article, Smooth projective plane, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
This article, Smooth projective plane, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
Template:New unreviewed article
Smooth projective planes are special projective planes. The most prominent example of a smooth projective plane is the real projective plane . Its geometric operations of joining two distinct points by a line and of intersecting two lines in a point are not only continuous but even smooth (infinitely differentiable=C). Similarly, the classical planes over the complex numbers, the quaternions, and the octonions are smooth planes. These are not the only such planes, however. In general, a smooth projective plane is defined as follows: the point space and the line space are smooth manifolds and both geometric operations of joining and intersecting are smooth. Obviously, the geometric operations of a smooth planes are continuous; hence each smooth plane is a compact topological plane.[1] 42.4. Smooth planes exist only with point spaces of dimension where , because this is true for compact connected projective topological planes, see [2] or [3] 54.11. Further down, these four cases will be treated separately.
Theorem. The point manifold of a smooth projective plane is homeomorphic to its classical counterpart, and so is the line manifold, see [4].
Automorphisms play a crucial rôle in the study of smooth planes. A bijection of the point set of a projecive plane is called a collineation if it maps lines onto lines. The continuous collineations of a compact projective plane form the group . This group will always be taken with the topology of uniform convergence. By [5] a remarkable fact holds:
Theorem. If is a smooth plane, then each continuous collineation of is smooth; in other words, the group of automorphisms of a smooth plane coincides with . Moreover, is a smooth Lie transformation group of and of .
The automorphism groups of the four classical planes are simple Lie groups of dimension or , respectively. All other smooth planes have much smaller groups, see below.
A projective plane is called a translation plane if its automorphism group has a subgroup which fixes each point on some line and acts sharply transitive on the set of points not on .
Translation planes. Every smooth projective translation plane is isomorphic to one of the four classical planes, see [6]
This shows that there are many compact connected topological projective planes which are not smooth. On the other hand, the following construction [7] yields even real analytic non-Desarguesian planes of dimension , , and with a compact group of automorphisms of dimension , , and respectively: represent points and lines in the usual way by homogeneous coordinates over the real or complex numbers or the quaternions, say by vectors of length . Then incidence of the point and the line is defined by , where is a fixed real parameter such that . Obviously, these planes are self-dual.
2-dimensional planes. Compact -dimensional projective planes can be described in the following way: the point space is a compact surface , each line is a Jordan curve in (a closed subset homeomorphic to the circle), and any two distinct points are joined by a unique line. Then is homeomorphic to the point space of the real plane , any two distinct lines intersect in a unique point, and the geometric operations are continuous (apply.[8] §31 to the complement of a line). A familiar family of examples has been given by Moulton [9] in 1902, see also [10] §34. These planes are characterized by the fact that they have a -dimensional automorphism group. They are not isomorphic to a smooth plane [11]. More generally, all non-classical compact -dimensional planes such that are known explicitly; none of these is smooth:
Theorem. If is a smooth -dimensional plane and if , then is the classical real plane , see [12].
4-dimensional planes. All compact planes with a -dimnsional point space and have been classified, see [13] 74.27. Up to duality, they are either translation planes or they are isomorphic to a unique so-called shift plane ([14] §74). According to [15], this shift plane is not smooth. Hence the result on translation planes implies
Theorem. A smooth -dimensional plane is isomorphic to the classical complex plane, or , see [16]
8-dimensional planes. Compact -dimensional topological planes have been discussed in [17] Chapter 8 and more recently in [18]. Put . Either is the classical quaternion plane or . If , then is a translation plane or a dual translation plane or a Hughes plane ([19] 1.10). The latter can be characterized as follows: leaves some classical complex subplane invariant and induces on the connected component of its full automorphism group ([20] §86 or [21] 3.19). The Hughes planes are not smooth, see [22] or [23] 9.17. This yields a similar result as in the case of -dimensional planes:
Theorem. If is a smooth -dimensional plane, then is the classical quaternion plane or .
16-dimensional planes. Now let denote the automorphism group of a compact -dimensional topological projective plane . Either is the smooth classical octonion plane or . If , then fixes a line and a point , and the affine plane and its dual are translation planes, see [24] 87.7. If , then also fixes an incident point-line pair, but neither nor are known explicitly. Nevertheless none of these planes can be smooth ([25] or [26], cf. also [27] 9.18 for a sketch of the proof):
Theorem. If is a -dimensional smooth projective plane, then is the classical octonion plane or .
The last four results combine to the following
Main Theorem. If is the largest value of , where is a non-classical compact -dimensional topological projective plane, then whenever is even smooth.
Complex analytic planes. The condition that the geometric operations of a projective plane are complex analytic is very restrictive, in fact, it is satisfied only in the classical complex plane, see [28] or [29] 75.1.
Theorem. Every complex analytic projective plane is isomorphic as an analytic plane to the complex plane with its standard analytic structure.
References
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
- ^ R. L\"owen 1983 Topology and dimension of stable planes: On a conjecture of H. Freudenthal, J. reine angew. Math. ’’’343, 108--122
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
- ^ L. Kramer 1994 The topology of smooth projective planes, Arch. Math. 63, 85–91
- ^ R. Bödi 1998 Collineations of smooth stable planes, Forum Math. 10, 751–773
- ^ J. Otte 1995 Smooth Projective Translation Planes, Geom. Dedicata 58, 203–212
- ^ S. Immervoll 2003 Real analytic projective planes with large automorphism groups, Adv. Geom. 3, 163–176
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
- ^ F. R. Moulton 1902 A simple non-desarguesian plane geometry, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 3, 192–195
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
- ^ D. Betten 1971 -dimensionale differenzierbare projektive Ebenen, Arch. Math. 22, 304–309
- ^ R. Bödi, Smooth stable and projective planes, Thesis, Tübingen 1996; (www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/ab/Geometrie.alt/Smoothstableplanes.ps) (9.1)
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
- ^ R. Bödi, Smooth stable and projective planes, Thesis, Tübingen 1996; (www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/ab/Geometrie.alt/Smoothstableplanes.ps)Chapter 10
- ^ R. Bödi, Smooth stable and projective planes, Thesis, Tübingen 1996; (www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/ab/Geometrie.alt/Smoothstableplanes.ps) (10.11)
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
- ^ H. Salzmann 2014 Compact planes, mostly -dimensional. A retrospect, http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0304
- ^ H. Salzmann 2014 Compact planes, mostly -dimensional. A retrospect, http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0304
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
- ^ H. Salzmann 2003 Baer subplanes, Illinois J. Math. 47, 485–513
- ^ R. Bödi 1999 Smooth Hughes planes are classical, Arch. Math. 73, 73–80
- ^ H. Salzmann 2014 Compact planes, mostly -dimensional. A retrospect, http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0304
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
- ^ R. Bödi, Smooth stable and projective planes, Thesis, Tübingen 1996; (www.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de/ab/Geometrie.alt/Smoothstableplanes.ps) Chapter 12
- ^ R. Bödi 1998 -dimensional smooth projective planes with large collineation groups, Geom. Dedicata 72, 283–298
- ^ H. Salzmann 2014 Compact planes, mostly -dimensional. A retrospect, http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0304
- ^ S. Breitsprecher 1967 Einzigkeit der reellen und der komplexen projektiven Ebene, Math. Z. 99, 429–432
- ^ H. Salzmann – D. Betten – T. Grundhöfer – H. Hähl – R. Löwen – M.Stroppel 1995 Compact Projective Planes, W. de Gruyter
This article, Smooth projective plane, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |