Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union/Collaboration
This page is for discussion on what the Portal:Rugby Union Collaboration of the Fortnight should be. Anyone is free to contribute, but please don't nominate or support an option unless you are willing to help it improve if it is elected as the fortnight's collaboration. Only positive support votes will be counted, except in the case of a tie. Please also only vote for a collaboration if you are willing to take part.
| Collaborations |
|---|
| Articles |
| Science and technology |
|
| Miscellaneous |
Purpose of the collaboration
Personally, I think the purpose of the collaboration should be to work up a rugby union-related article to featured article status. The articles should either be in a key rugby area (eg pages on the domestic competitions) or alternatively close enough to featured article status already such that a collaboration is likely to bring it up to FA quality, --HamedogTalk|@ 02:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Current collaboration
North America 4, also known as IRB North America 4 is a North American rugby union competition launched in 2006. The competition is contested between two newly formed representative teams from each Canada and the United States. The competition is funded by the International Rugby Board (IRB), and is part of their three-year global strategic investment programme which is designed to increase the competitiveness of international rugby union in Canada and the United States...
Selected October 1.
Previous collaborations
Removed nominations
Nominations
Support
- Needs a lot more detail, eg; Crowds, competitiveness, stadiums, notable events etc etc etc. Cvene64 10:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- Is this information widely avaliable?--HamedogTalk|@ 03:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- IMO, yes, even using internet resources and general knowledge, I think the article could double in size. Cvene64 03:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Don't think we should change articles, even though it has been a month, because the IRB article still needs work. We really need back the enthusiasm we had at the start of the Collaboration, when rugby union was chosen.--HamedogTalk|@ 14:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not opposed to keeping IRB for longer either, it really can be a lot better. No harm in voting for others until were done though, and yes, it would be fantastic to get this project fully alive again! Cvene64 16:28, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Nominated on 18 October, 2006.
Support
- Has some information there, however a lot of work can be done. Clearly quite a bit of information out there on him that is accessible. Would be great for a current, tier one coach to have a high quality article about them. - Shudda talk 01:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Template
Selected collaboration
- On article page
 | This is the current rugby union collaboration of the month. Please help improve it to good article standard. |
Nominated article
- On article page
|
|
This article is nominated for rugby union collaboration of the month. Please vote on the nomination here. |