Talk:Mathematical proof

Do you consider anything, or are there limitations?

The reason I ask is that I have been working in an old field that would be consuidered new, as it has not been explored to any extent that I am aware of.

It does things like taking the 3, 4, 5 triangle theorem and advances it to the realm of possibly being able to create matter through the use of the numbers generated as frequencies of atomics.

Within this it also seems to eliminate all but 3 through 8, using these combnations to illucidate the apparent tetrahedral as the basis for all matter structure in a solid light format.

If these things are what this page is all about, then I have come to the right place.

Bear in mind that many of the usual laws of both mathematics and physics including constants become subject to a different paradigm that might seem to negate what is now comonly accepted by most of accademia.

It has been found that thee seems to be three sets of individual laws or sets of constants depending on exactly what is being dealt with.

All that is available to date is a very general philosiphy of this new math, though I will make that available upon request.

DKBailey contact me at [email protected]

Your material seems to be original research and is therefore not suitable for Wikipedia, which attempts to be an encyclopedia of established knowledge. Once your theories have been published and well received, we will cover them here. AxelBoldt 23:03 Jan 4, 2003 (UTC)