User talk:Shaggy9872004

Hello Shaggy9872004! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ~ E meZxX 06:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Your edit on TGYH

Hi, I'd just like to tell you about your edits on thank god you're here. I really think that it isn't appropriate to make a table for the next episode until it actually finishes playing, see(WP:NOT) a crystal ball. What if the show gets axed for example (though i hope it doesn't) Please don't take this the wrong way, but remember it for future reference. ~ E meZ xX 11:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Wedge (TV show)

Hi there, some editors have expressed concern that you are removing sections of this article without discussion or consensus. If you feel there is a legitimate reason that the "Criticism" section should not be in this article, I encourage you to discuss it on the article's discussion page before deleting an entire section. Agreed? If you have any questions, please let me know. --Aguerriero (talk) 14:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering - I actually agree that the section should be removed, but not for the reason you cite. Of course criticism is "against" the subject, but any article is open to well-sourced criticism. That's just the problem. The criticism section for the show is sourced from blogs, which are not acceptable citations for Wikipedia. Instead of removing the text repeatedly, how about you post on the Talk page your reasons for doing so and see if other editors agree with you? --Aguerriero (talk) 12:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the edit history of this article in less then 2hours the article was attacked by a vandal swapping across ip addresses this vandal made 15 individual attacks to this article alone during this period. Adding "is a pitiful new " to the opening sentence and altering genre from "sketch comedy" to "poor television" and some other such edits. All I did was revert those attacks, I didn't add or alter any existing information prior to those attacks. Again this morning "is a pitiful new" had been added from another annon IP. If you wish me to ignore further such vandalism to this article I'll quite happily agree, but please before you comment on a users talk page check what was occuring in the edit history and ensure you have your facts right. Gnangarra 09:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

that editor has a distinct dislike and has returned tonight making a less disruptive edit than previously but i'll let you decide if its a problem Gnangarra 13:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This revert vandalism is getting crazy I've request semi protection for the article, that means only logged in users can edit not IP addresses. Suggest that you try to find some compromise on the wording of the article as some of the claims are kinda support even though the reference is the best choice. Gnangarra 11:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]