User talk:71.162.66.250

Hey, if you have concerns, please don't hesitate to discuss them with me on my talk page. You will find that I can be a very resonable person, and I assure that I'm no vandal! Cheers, Khoikhoi 03:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am not sure if it was a mistake and you meant to fix subsequent changes added after mine today but if I was unfair or misinterpreted what happened, accept my apologies. I have no doubt that anyone who wishes to add to common knowledge dissemination is or should be a fair person if hanging around here. I reposted my humble contributions but you can edit them or tell me what you dont like so I can fix to your liking. Also, thanks for taking the time to post a comment. Good night for now.

Alright, no problem. I disagreed with some of them but others were fine (I'll post comments on the talk page). Cheers, Khoikhoi 03:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can sign articles by puting in four of these ~. Khosrow II 05:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.162.66.250 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

negotiating khoikhoi's vandalism and restoring his deletions of contributions is not reversals to be subjected to 3rr, study the article's log history properly. by the way, i posted vandalism assistance request at two different administration sites and none responded. Where were you then?

Decline reason:

Content disputes are not considered vandalism. Please be careful to use talk pages to discuss your edits and develop consensus when editing; edit warring is strongly discouraged, please consider making good use of the dispute resolution process when this block expires. Thanks for your time. Luna Santin 10:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By the way, you are incorrect that no-one responded - please see the discussion at WP:AN in response to your message there. Thanks, Gwernol 16:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

71.162.66.250 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am so surprised that some even have a place on the planet in presence of dominating fascists like you. Hmm, I wonder why they hate us. It just cant be us. (is that truthful enough for your big head ?) this is absurd. What content dispute? A prejudiced vandal full of ethnic hatred comes and says he does not like the good stuff written in there and starts deleting them saying he is disputing it with no intellectual valid point, ending up blocking me for restoring what I wrote. He is not even expert to challenge or refute the content matter let alone disputing on what he just idiotically hates and you end up calling this legit? Are you guys for real? No wonder they think internet nerds dont have alife. negotiating khoikhoi's vandalism and restoring his deletions of contributions is not reversals to be subjected to 3rr the way it was imposed by cohoting side kick, study the article's log history properly. by the way, i posted vandalism assistance request at two different administration sites and none responded. Where were you then?

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am so surprised that some even have a place on the planet in presence of dominating fascists like you. Hmm, I wonder why they hate us. It just cant be us. (is that truthful enough for your big head ?)

this is absurd. What content dispute? A prejudiced vandal full of ethnic hatred comes and says he does not like the good stuff written in there and starts deleting them saying he is disputing it with no intellectual valid point, ending up blocking me for restoring what I wrote. He is not even expert to challenge or refute the content  matter let alone disputing on what he just idiotically hates and you end up calling this legit? Are you guys for real? No wonder they think internet nerds dont have alife. negotiating khoikhoi's vandalism and restoring his deletions of contributions is not reversals to be subjected to 3rr the way it was imposed by cohoting side kick, study the article's log history properly. by the way, i posted vandalism assistance request at two different administration sites and none responded. Where were you then? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am so surprised that some even have a place on the planet in presence of dominating fascists like you. Hmm, I wonder why they hate us. It just cant be us. (is that truthful enough for your big head ?)

this is absurd. What content dispute? A prejudiced vandal full of ethnic hatred comes and says he does not like the good stuff written in there and starts deleting them saying he is disputing it with no intellectual valid point, ending up blocking me for restoring what I wrote. He is not even expert to challenge or refute the content  matter let alone disputing on what he just idiotically hates and you end up calling this legit? Are you guys for real? No wonder they think internet nerds dont have alife. negotiating khoikhoi's vandalism and restoring his deletions of contributions is not reversals to be subjected to 3rr the way it was imposed by cohoting side kick, study the article's log history properly. by the way, i posted vandalism assistance request at two different administration sites and none responded. Where were you then? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am so surprised that some even have a place on the planet in presence of dominating fascists like you. Hmm, I wonder why they hate us. It just cant be us. (is that truthful enough for your big head ?)

this is absurd. What content dispute? A prejudiced vandal full of ethnic hatred comes and says he does not like the good stuff written in there and starts deleting them saying he is disputing it with no intellectual valid point, ending up blocking me for restoring what I wrote. He is not even expert to challenge or refute the content  matter let alone disputing on what he just idiotically hates and you end up calling this legit? Are you guys for real? No wonder they think internet nerds dont have alife. negotiating khoikhoi's vandalism and restoring his deletions of contributions is not reversals to be subjected to 3rr the way it was imposed by cohoting side kick, study the article's log history properly. by the way, i posted vandalism assistance request at two different administration sites and none responded. Where were you then? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Personal attack warning

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Gwernol 00:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.