Jump to content

User:Rrfayette

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rrfayette (talk | contribs) at 00:49, 13 November 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome! Chat, Relax, and have some Tea!

Invitation: You are granted permission to edit this user page as you wish only if the changes enhances the already incredible presentation arranged and illustrated below. HaHa, "incredible!" Yea right!

As a note, I sign as this —SolelyFacts (will update as needed)

Template:Policylist Deletion

Current Focus

  • To be a check on Jimbo[1] so he doesn't become a dictator

Rarities

From Time to Time

Future Projects

In no particular order:

  • WP:TPG
  • WP:MOS
  • Articles I have linked to from my user and talk pages.
  • Six projects I am a member of

Past Actions

Things of the past. I forget those things.

  • Tagging Articles w/o Sources
  • Talking too much with other users

Rules can be broken and ought be broken but there are certain principles that should never be without justifiable reasons:

  • Write with a neutral, unbiased, objective point of view
  • Verify information by citing reliable sources; content must have been published prior to being on Wikipedia

Summary: Verifiable... means that any reader should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Any material that is challenged... needs a reliable source... If an article topic has no reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. Any edit lacking a source may be removed...

Jimmy Wales has said of this: "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information...

Editors should try to familiarize themselves with all three.

Useful Tools:

{{Fact}}

  • to request citation for a statement

{{Unsourced}}

  • to request sources for an article or section

{{Verify}}

  • to indicate that some information has not been verified and may not be reliable

{{Npov}}

  • to dispute neutrality of an article

{{Bias}}

  • to nominated an article to be checked for its neutrality

{{Notability}}

  • to express concern that the subject of the article does not satisfy notability guidelines

{{Expand}}

  • to request expansion of an article

{{Prod}}

  • to propose an article for deletion.

Use Subst:Prod|Insignificant Topic and/or Notability

{{Db}}

  • to propose an article for speedy deletion.

· Albert Einstein · Chess · Cryptography · Data Encryption Standard · Diamond · Evolution · Free will · Game theory · Gold standard · HTTP cookie · Libertarianism · Philosophy of mind · Poetry · Speed of light · Supply and demand · Theodore Roosevelt · United States Bill of Rights

Projects

This user is a member of the WikiProject Computer science.
This user is a member of the Business WikiProject.
This user is a member of WikiProject Color.