Jump to content

Phase reduction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gpkp (talk | contribs) at 16:38, 9 January 2019 (+Minor fixes, ref /Reference edited with ProveIt). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Phase reduction is a method used to reduce a multi-dimensional dynamical equation describing a nonlinear limit cycle oscillator into a one-dimensional phase equation.[1][2] Many phenomenon in our world such as chemical reactions, electric circuits, mechanical vibrations, cardiac cells, and spiking neorons are examples of rhythmic phenomena, and can be considered as nonlinear limit cycle oscillators.[2]

History

The theory of phase reduction method was first introduced in the 1950s, the existence of periodic solutions to nonlinear oscillators under perturbation, has been discussed by Malkin in [3], in the 1960s, Winfree illustrated the importance of the notion of phase and formulated the phase model for a population of nonlinear oscillators in his studies on biological synchronization. [4] Since then, many researchers have discovered different rhythmic phenomena related to phase reduction theory.

Phase dynamics

Consider the dynamical system of the form

where is the oscillator state variable, is the baseline vector field. Let be the flow induced by the system, that is, is the solution of the system for the initial condition . This system of differential equations can describe for a neuron model for conductance with , where represents the voltage difference across the membrane and represents the -dimensional vector that defines gating variables. [5] When a neuron is perturbed by a stimulus current, the dynamics of the perturbed system will no longer be the same with the dynamics of the baseline neural oscillator. Assuming that the baseline (unperturbed) neural oscillator has an attracting limit cycle with period (example, see Figure xx) that is normally hyperbolic, [6] one can show that persists under small perturbations. [7] This implies that for a small perturbation, the perturbed system will remain close to the limit cycle. Hence we assume that such a limit cycle always exists for each neuron.

The target here is to reduce the system by defining a phase for each point in some neighborhood of the limit cycle. The allowance of sufficiently small perturbations (e.g. external forcing or stimulus effect to the system) might cause a large deviation of the phase, but the amplitude is perturbed slightly because of the attracting of the limit cycle. [8] Hence we need to extend the definition of the phase to points in the neighborhood of the cycle by introducing the definition of asymptotic phase. So for all point in some neighbourhood of the cycle, the evolution of the phase can be given by the relation , where is the natural frequency of the oscillation. [5][9] By the chain rule we then obtain an equation that govern the evolution of the phase of the neuron model is

where is the gradient of the phase with respect to the vector of the neuron's state vector , for the derivation of this result, see [2][5][9]

References

  1. ^ "A simple solution-phase reduction method for the synthesis of shape-controlled platinum nanoparticles". Materials Letters. ScienceDirect. 2005-05-01. pp. 1567–1570. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2005.01.024. Retrieved 2019-01-09.
  2. ^ a b c H.Nakao (2017). "Phase reduction approach to synchronization of nonlinear oscillators". Contemporary Physics. 57 (2): 188–214. arXiv:1704.03293. doi:10.1080/00107514.2015.1094987.
  3. ^ Hoppensteadt F.C. and Izhikevich E.M (1997 doi=10.1007/978-1-46121828-9). Weakly neural networks. Vol. 126. Springer-Verlag, New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-46121828-9 (inactive 2019-01-08). {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Missing pipe in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2019 (link)
  4. ^ Winfree A.T. (2001). The Geometry of Biological Time. Springer, New York.
  5. ^ a b c E.Brown, J.Moehlis, P.Holmes (2004). "On the Phase Reduction and Response Dynamics of Neural Oscillator Populations". Neural Computation. 16: 673–715.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ J.Guckenheimer and P.Holmes (1983). Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer, NY.
  7. ^ N.Fenichel (1971). "Persistence and smoothness of invariant manifolds for flows". Indiana University Mathematics JOurnal. 21 (3).
  8. ^ M.Rosenblum and A.Pikovsky (2003). "Synchronization: from pendulum clocks to chaotic lasers and chemical oscillators". Contemporary Physics. 44 (5): 401–416.
  9. ^ a b N.W.Schultheiss; et al. (2012). The Theory of Weakly Coupled Oscillators. Vol. 6. pp. 3–31. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.225.4260. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0739-3_1. ISBN 978-1-4614-0738-6. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Text "Phase response curves in Neuroscience: Theory, experiment, and analysis" ignored (help)