Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogfart

Dogfart

At best a neologism, but more likely advertising for a pornography web-site. --BM 03:02, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

As far as porn sites go, this one is fairly notable. Weak delete for now, but I could be convinced there's a reason to have an article. Tuf-Kat 03:13, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)

Delete.Mikkalai 04:16, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I've heard of this. It's marginally article-worthy. Keep for principle's sake, although the chance of a good article here seems rather small.
Delete as I don't think it's notable (as I have heard a fair amount about Internet porn and never heard of this, and merely hearing of something by itself wouldn't be notable, there'd have to be a solid reason, some major effect on the world) and it's specifically created to only be advertising, with nothing to say if the plug for the site is removed. DreamGuy 08:38, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
Delete even the article says the term's exclusive to one site. Icundell 12:03, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Bad Ad. utcursch 12:25, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
Comment: I would vote to keep if there was any evidence of even moderate ~~notability~~significance in its field. Kappa 17:53, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete nn Van Nuys slang. Wyss 22:17, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete, advertising. Dpbsmith (talk) 22:20, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Very well known internet porn site. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:14, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Erring on the side of keep. This term doesn't appear to be exclusive as the article claims. Has anyone researched this? Why is Google returning over 598,000+ hits?? Notability is obviously understated. —RaD Man (talk) 10:16, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Do keep in mind that some of the results do end up literally regarding canine flatulence. =) --Andylkl 11:14, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Promotion for pornographic website and absolutely no encyclopedic content. --Andylkl 11:14, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
Keep - Like it or not, pornography is a genuine subject and that brand of porn is rather notable. -- Judson 22:16, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep, it just needs to be expanded larger (no pun intended). -- Crevaner 00:05, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Agree with points made above. -- Old Right 00:54, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Keep. It is not at all exclusive to that site. You can find dogfart at thousands of places across the web, as even a cursory Google search will display. Edit out the bit about its being exclusive and expand the rest. Dr Zen 01:21, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)