User talk:Moe Epsilon

Freqently Asked Questions (FAQ)                          Q: Why have you reduced the size of my file? A: In accordance with Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria 3(b): An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low, rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate, is used (especially where the original could be used for deliberate copyright infringement). If you believe I have made an error in reducing the image, please let me know. If there was no error is the lowering in the resolution, please keep the image reduced and keep it tagged until an administrator has deleted the larger versions of the image. Q: Why have you tagged my file as {{di-bad fair use}} 10(c)? A: I have tagged it as in violation of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria 10(c): The name of each article (a link to each article is also recommended) in which fair use is claimed for the item, and a separate, specific non-free use rationale for each use of the item, as explained at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. The rationale is presented in clear, plain language and is relevant to each use. Meaning, provide a fair use rationale on the file description page, every time you use it on a different article. Otherwise it does not meet criteria for inclusion and it can be nominated for deletion. Q: Why have you removed my image from an article because of 10(c)? A: The file does not have a fair use rationale on the file description page for why it is on that article. If you add a rationale, you are free to use the image on the article once again. Q: Why have you tagged my file as {{di-bad fair use}} 10(a)? A: I have tagged it as in violation of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria 10(a): Identification of the source of the material, supplemented, where possible, with information about the artist, publisher and copyright holder; this is to help determine the material's potential market value. A source for where the image was taken from needs to be specified, otherwise it will be marked for deletion. Q: Why have you added {{deletable image-caption}} to an article? A: This is to notify users that the image next to the caption is a candidate for speedy deletion in a number of days due to problems specified on the image description page. Q: Couldn't you just fix this image problem yourself? A: While I tag and re-sizing images, I do keep a look-out for things I can fix, rather than tag it for fixing. There is somewhere near 340,000 non-free images on Wikipedia, so I can't do this alone. Q: Are you an administrator? A: No, I am not an administrator here. I can not protect or delete pages, move over redirects, or block users. For a full list of privileges I have, and projects where I have them, see this page. Also, if you offer to nominate me for adminiship, I will probably decline. I have had a few nominations in the past, the last being in 2006. If I ever run again, it will be a long time from now. Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me: Ideally, I would like to have any conversation continued on the page where it was started. If I have left a message on your talk page please do not reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied. Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading. Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'. Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived. To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link. You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~). This page- Drama free days 4591 Response Hi, Moe. I'm so sorry for late response. I am pretty busy in my real life, and had many tests in schools. I apologize for late response. Anyways, How are you doing? I occassionally check my messages here, but I didn't have time to response your messages, and when your school will start Winter Break? Daniel5127 <Talk> 02:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Same as mine My school will start winter break next week, but will start on Jan. 8. Daniel5127 <Talk> 02:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Yeb, I will have party with my friends on christmas, and watching movie in theatre, and contributing some articles. Daniel5127 <Talk> 02:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Question and comments about wrestling teams/stables I thought an admin was going to delete the list page (from what you posted on the talk page)? Or are you waiting to make the new article(s)? I suppose it's smart to just wait anyway, since many teams probably should go. It would save some time when making a table for the new things. I noticed Fire and Ice is gone now, so that's a good start to this team cleanup. A prod I placed on Christian and Tyson Tomko was removed, so I'm sending it to AFD. Granted they are a duo in TNA currently, they still haven't done much. All relevant and notable information can go into their pages (if not in them already). I believe prods are on several teams still, so it's likely a prod deletion could work for some (I'm hoping at least). This "tag team cruft" needs to be eliminated from Wikipedia. RobJ1981 06:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Moral support? I must say that I'm somewhat surprised that you are voting moral support at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/PMA. I really dislike the "moral support" votes, but at least often there can be some rationale behind them. But giving moral support to somebody whose entire effort in running for ArbCom is a single sentence that can be boiled down to "I've been here five years" is beyond the pale. Maybe you see this differently, but when I support a candidate, I'm putting some of my credibility on the line to do so. Your credibility, at least in my eyes, has taken a hit for your support of this non-candidate. I've given credence to your opinion in the past, and will do so in the future, but not quite so much as before when I see you supporting or opposing an RfA nominee or another ArbCom candidate. —Doug Bell talk 08:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC) United Wrestling Association Thank you very much for your time & effort cleaning up United Wrestling Association. It looks wonderful now. I appreciate that very much. STFmaryville 13:46, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Triple Crown and Grand Slam Champions I am not and was never looking to start trouble, all I am trying to do is expand a definition based on fact and references. The Triple Crown and the Grand Slam are what we have been going back and forth on. My contention is that The Intercontinental and United States Championships are equal and thus are interchangeable when when deciding a Crown/Slam. You say no because WWE never explicitly came out and said so. On 8-4-06, JBL said he was a Slam winner. A WWE wrestler on WWE TV said he accomplished a WWE sanctioned feat. It was said that no outside source has verified this, but no one in WWE has disputed JBL's claim either. Also it must be pointed out that PWI has always considered the two championships as equal. When PWI used to do their rankings for WWF and WCW, the I-C and U.S. Titles were always listed as automatic number one contenders for their respective World Champions. The same holds true today when they do the rankings for Raw (I-C) and Smackdown (U.S.). PWI is considered the main source for what is considered a "World Title" and their word is law here on Wikipedia. They also have always maintained that the I-C and U.S. Championships are of equal value and of equal standing. As I have said before, I am not trying to vandalize or add nonsense to Wikipedia, only enhance it with an updated definition based on consensus and fact, based on logic and references. JBL, PWI, and many other wiki users have backed up this definition. (Look at the Triple Crown Champion Discussion page). All I ask is my contribution be allowed to stand as I respectfully feel that I am in the right on this one. Thank you for your time. Vlh. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vlh (talk • contribs) 23:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC). ReTemplate:Sprotected3 The merge idea sounds good. Thanks Jay(Reply) 00:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)