Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coren (talk | contribs) at 02:45, 9 August 2007 (→‎[[:User:CorenSearchBot]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.
You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.

The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats, and all of them keep an eye on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

To request your administrator status to be removed, initiate a new section below.

Crat tasks
RfAs 0
RfBs 0
Overdue RfBs 0
Overdue RfAs 0
BRFAs 15
Approved BRFAs 0
Requests for adminship and bureaucratshipupdate
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)
It is 09:49:08 on June 5, 2023, according to the server's time and date.

Elonka RfA

Just a heads-up for the 'crats that there's socking at Elonka's RfA; see Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Elonka 2#Sockpuppetry for details. Mackensen (talk) 02:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is not actually true - see my subsequent posts at WP:AN for more details. There was one meatpuppet vote, which has been struck out - the rest of the vote has been unaffected. Rebecca 11:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just to note there's no disagreement between myself and Rebecca on this point. Mackensen (talk) 15:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Since when do we "strike out" comments at RfA? Aren't bureaucrats recommended to determine consensus and disregard comments by meatpuppets etc when doing so? And since when is RfA a "vote"? Melsaran (formerly Salaskаn) 05:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nothing was stricken as a result of this investigation, and RfA's not a vote. Andre (talk) 22:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Rebecca just said: "There was one meatpuppet vote, which has been struck out - the rest of the vote has been unaffected." Melsaran (formerly Salaskаn) 13:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Rebecca misspoke. Andrevan indented those votes [1] and then unindented them [2].--Chaser - T 13:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure if I needed to ask here or if you have a scoreboard someplace you would have seen, but my bot got approved [3] and needs its flag. — Coren (talk) 02:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Approved on my watchlist, so no need to ask here. It's been done, though. Andre (talk) 02:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Face-wink.svg Thanks. — Coren (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]