User talk:MrsSnoozyTurtle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CT55555 (talk | contribs) at 15:13, 26 November 2022 (on accusations/implications that I am canvassing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Women in Red November 2022

Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

November 2022

There is a discussion at WP:NPOVN in which you may be interested. I'm also letting you know about the following given your interest in a Russian topic:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Vladimir.copic (talk) 00:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from David Smith (journalist), which you proposed for deletion. Reasons are given in the article's Talk Page. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Tlhslobus (talk) 01:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tlhslobus. Thank you for your efforts to improve the article and for letting me know. Yes, I will not add the Proposed Deletion to it again. All the best, MrsSnoozyTurtle 04:33, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Tlhslobus (talk) 05:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to your allegations about me canvassing

I am replying to you on your talk page, rather than at WP:ARS as discussion on editors conduct should be done on their talk page, or appropriate notice board. I see you don't follow why I said to please read WP:CANVASS so I am breaking that down in a table below.

My perceptions
What Wikipedia:Casting aspersions says Your actions My gap analysis of your actions
ArbCom: "Legitimate concerns of fellow editors' conduct should be raised either directly with the editor in question, in a civil fashion, or if necessary on an appropriate noticeboard or dispute-resolution page"

ArbCom: "If accusations must be made, they should be raised, with evidence, on the user-talk page of the editor they concern or in the appropriate forums."

Example1 accusation/implication of Wikipedia:Canvassing was made in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titus (dinosaur)

Example 2: accusation/implication of Wikipedia:Canvassing was made at Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron – Rescue list#List of Nazi monuments in Canada

Neither of your accusations or implications were made "directly with the editor in question" nor "an appropriate noticeboard or dispute-resolution page"
ArbCom "An editor must not accuse another of misbehavior without evidence, especially when the accusations are repeated or severe" The Canvassing implication was made twice; it was repeated. Although I think you are mistaken, the accusation is not base-less, it was in response to actions. So you have evidence, it just (in my opinion) doesn't support the allegation/implication.

That said, now you've made the same allegation/implication, it has been done twice.

In summary, you've twice made the same allegation/implication about me and twice I think incorrectly and twice in the wrong space, i.e. not on my talk page or on a notice board. Because you have done this twice, it is therefore "repeated" and starting to reach relevance with behaviour that has been characterised as casting aspersions. It is not clear to me if you have, or what degree you have exhibited behaviour that is at odds with that guideline, I am not accusing you of breaking it, I am saying that you're close to the line.

I am politely asking you to not repeat the pattern of complaining about me in the wrong forum. Of course we may disagree if this is canvassing, and of course either of us could be correct. So I invite you to make complaints formally and present evidence at notice boards, or don't make them. CT55555(talk) 15:13, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]