User talk:Scabab

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Xexerss (talk | contribs) at 19:47, 28 January 2023 (→‎January 2023). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

October 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm The1337gamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tekken Tag Tournament 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 08:43, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder about sourcing (Warning)

Things like a film's gross revenue require citations to reliable sources. A Twitter account is a questionable source for information like revenue; an unverified Twitter is never reliable. —C.Fred (talk) 16:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its been verified other places as well like Eiga.Scabab (talk) 21:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't partly change ([1]) reference which is cited multiple times because you are making issue with citation style, verification and original research. Also, being verified elsewhere doesn't imply we can and should cite a Twitter post. I advise you to read carefully Wikipedian editing and citing policy.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 23:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You made again such a disruptive edit ([2]). Please stop doing that.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 19:54, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And again ([3]). You have been multiple times warned about this issue. If you continue to ignore the warnings and do so there's a high probability you will get reported to the administrators noticeboard. Learn how to properly edit and cite sources according to Wikipedian policy!--Miki Filigranski (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what you're rambling about to be honest. That it's how much money the movie made, it is a 100% fact, I included a reference from Comscore as proof. Sorted, now stop being a pest.
It's about citation style. Learn how to properly edit and cite on Wikipedia.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is my last warning before reporting you to the admin's noticeboard because with your ignorance you're intentionally starting an WP:EDITWAR.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It has nothing to do with being ignorant, I just don't know how to do it. I don't know the coding because I don't regularly edit. Plus any reference I've put in someone else has fixed it up anyway.Scabab (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a valid excuse. It only shows you're ignorant of learning how to properly edit on Wikipedia. Follow the basics from Help:Contents, and start to learn on article of low quality level, not like of the movie Broly. No, "somebody else will fix it up" excuse won't pass.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 20:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yet it is the excuse that I'm giving. I'm not going to waste my time on sorting all this stuff out for the sake of a day when the reference that's put is already out of date and needs replacing. I'm finding this before everyone else, that's my part done.Scabab (talk) 20:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Great, then use that excuse as explanation for the admins. The Wikipedian editing community doesn't work like that nor you WP:OWN the article with this "ego" to be first as it's like somekind of an achievement. You don't have a basic idea what Wikipedia is - it's an encyclopedia which is edited according to quality of WP:NPOV and WP:VERIFY, and not your "I will first make an update, however it is bad, because of my ego".--Miki Filigranski (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You're rambling, I said nothing about it being an achievement. I give the updates first and then other people work with it. You on the other hand either remove information entirely or swap out the latest information for old information. You aren't familiar with the Box Office aspect of the movie so you should leave well alone because you're making it worse constantly.Scabab (talk) 18:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your updates are disruptive removal of reliable secondary sources, updates which don't cite any source or links are not working hence cannot be WP:VERIFY. You make other people waste their time fix your edits - that's what you are doing. You don't have a basic understanding that the article must be based on reliable sources not editor original research claims. You are constantly making violations of multiple editing principles, ignoring to understand that and only continue to WP:EDITWAR.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 19:14, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Every single link works, there's a direct link to the $53.5 million updated figure given on Screen Daily. A direct link to $1.3 million in Ecuador which you remove.
You speak of reliable sources and yet Boxfice Mojo listed the gross at $69.96 million and yet removed it anyway only because you didn't see it before the page began to update. You're lack of knowledge is getting in the way of having factual information on the page. You are removing up to date sourced information and replacing it with old estimated figures.Scabab (talk) 19:20, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No. Just no. Stop this. Stop ignoring other reliable secondary sources you're constantly removing, stop ignoring WP:VERIFY, WP:RS, WP:SYNTH, WP:OR and so on which you are violating. Editing Wikipedia is not a joke.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 19:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but you don't get to say this. Box Office Mojo is a legitimate source, they stated it's gross of $69.99 million and yet despite that very clear fact you still vandilised the page by removing this factual information multiple times.
Do NOT remove factual sourced information from the page. The Deadline figures were an ESTIMATE. Screen Daily listed the ACTUALS and the references which switched to match that.Scabab (talk) 19:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It has nothing to do with BOM. The link did not work for verification and the info cannot be based on your or any other editor claims. You don't know what you are talking about with estimates and actual information, you are making it up which is another example of original research.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 20:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect, I made no claim. the gross was listed and stated clearly. The page updated and upon doing so the exact same gross was listed. You removed this factual information merely because you did know any better.
Not only did you change the gross from before that listed as of Friday, you also chanhed from the gross listed on Box Office Mojo on Thursday as well.
You have no clue what you're even on about. I don't even know why when it's not complicated. Deadline said $54.3 million worldwide that was an estimate also listed on Screen Daily. The following day they made an update to correct the gross to $53.5 million worldwide. This is not at all confusing in anyway. Do not vandalise pages because you uninformed.Scabab (talk) 20:12, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about? When update finished I immediately included the information...--Miki Filigranski (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter, why are you incapable of understanding anything? Box Office Mojo ALREADY listed $69.99 million BEFORE the update. That's why I included it on the page. You removed that information merely because the page was updateing....then added it right back again. You removed what I added and then put it right back.
You removed what I added because you didn't see the gross and you didn't "trust" me. Then you looked like a fool when the page updated and it did exactly what I said it did. You had no business making any changes in the first place because it was 100% correct the entire time.Scabab (talk) 20:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The only one incapable of understanding anything is you.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 20:46, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You aren't an experienced editor, they don't remove factual information because they don't "trust" someone. That's how children act. You're removing sourced information off the page, that's vandalism and not what experienced editors do.Scabab (talk) 20:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alright, enough from all of y'all. Scabab, let Miki Filigranski clean up the mess he made--this admin has seen it, and User:JJMC89, User:Huon, and User:Lord Roem can see it in the history. Filigranski, I don't know what got into you, screaming like this; I suppose it's a good idea to try and clean it up a little bit, but it is a bad, bad idea to a. edit war over it and b. not ask for permission/apologize for your incredibly rude words. Can we move on? Drmies (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Drmies: Nothing, life stress... I said I'm sorry, but as you wish, I apologize to everyone. Yes, I wish to move on and made an extensive reply on the content at the article's page ([4]). Afterwards will really need a "walk" and perhaps find some other article.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 01:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Thanks for contributing in Dragon Ball Super: Broly. I just wanted to let you know that the edit you made are incorrect and not backed up by the reference or citation. Please try to investigate further and remember Wikipedia doesn't predict the future. Feel free to ask in it's talk page. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Masum Rezatalk 07:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No actually it was correct when I put it in there. Box Office Mojo recently updated it and the overseas gross went from $70.136 million to $70.04 million.Scabab (talk) 07:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attention needed at username change request

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what this means exactly but I still want my name changed. Scabab (talk) 11:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rocky (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drago. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Sleyece. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sleyece (talk) 05:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 06:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dragon Ball Super: Broly, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 19:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dragon Ball Super: Broly, you may be blocked from editing. Xexerss (talk) 19:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]