Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inclusive classroom (0th nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joyous! (talk | contribs) at 23:42, 7 December 2004 ([[Inclusive classroom]]: please avoid personal attacks.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Unencylopedic, POV, research paper. Delete this and all associated images. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 02:04, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep, badly formatted but there is some good content. - SimonP 02:40, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Parts of the existing article are probably copyvios. If the article is cleaned up, I would change to keep. DCEdwards1966 03:34, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: It's a massive c&p from other sites. I don't have a problem with discussing mainstreaming in general or even the concept by this particular name, but it's entirely unencyclopedic now -- written very much in EdSpeak with EdCadence. It's an advocacy page. If it is radically cleaned up by the end of voting, I would change my vote, but the clean up would be severe. Geogre 03:57, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, send to cleanup. [[User:Rhymeless|Rhymeless | (Methyl Remiss)]] 06:06, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep--and cleanup. Article addresses a significant topic in education. Needs NPOVing, however. Jacob1207 21:26, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep and send to cleanup. Valid topic. Let's try to get it cleaned up before we rush into deletion. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 21:45, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete this codswallop. Good example of why north American education majors shouldn't be allowed to teach innocent children. Wyss 21:53, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Please avoid personal attacks. We're voting on the article, not the author or the profession. Joyous 23:42, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)