User talk:Synergy

I am currently: User:SynergeticMaggot/Status

Ash and baby V

Hi Synmaggot,

The reason I went straight to MfD was that the vandalism was congruent with the name: it seemed that the user had created an account specifically to post about a friendship, and not to edit WP. On reflection, I suppose assuming good faith would lead one to block first and delete later if necessary.

Thanks for the advice. --Slashme (talk) 11:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FUNLIB

Well, that was certainly bizarre - I've EC'd on a close, but I've never seen a double-close. No problem, either way. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 12:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

[1]. The perils of going by both Dan and Daniel. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 17:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. I didn't think to look. Thanks for the link. — _Maggot^Syn 17:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Torres AfD

Sorry I'd gone to bed before I saw your message. I'm happy to work on the article some. Will try to do so this morning between meetings and what not, but I find it hard to source from home. Wikicite doesn't work on my Mac :( _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 13:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ETA, done. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 14:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a final count of 42 supporting, 2 opposing and 2 neutral. I would like to thank Keeper76 especially for the great nomination. I look forward to assist the project and its community as an administrator. Thanks again, Cenarium ^Talk 01:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sharkface217/Awards Center

I have re-opened this debate. Two and a half hours was insufficient. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(copied over from my talk page:) It's a good enough reason, I think. Wikipedia has contributions from editors who contribute from time zones all over the world. And two and a half hours is, frankly, a joke: I was at dinner the whole time that this debate was (briefly) open. You need to give these things more time. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

(copied over from my talk page:) This is not a frivolous MfD. If someone else closes as keep after there's been time for discussion, so be it. But you need to have the discussion first. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if you've noticed, but there was a discussion already. What happens now is even more reasons to keep. — _Maggot^Syn 08:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)save, for those out there who delete per nom :)[reply]

Again, there was a discussion for 150 minutes. Or to which other discussion are you referring? --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the discussion in which no one thus far has agreed with the nominator, and has asked that it be closed. Its a good faith project, and I consider it poor form to go to MfD a third time, especially when the last nom is arguing to keep it. — _Maggot^Syn 08:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent and copied over from my talk page:) My opinion, as an editor (not as an admin) is that there is indeed a serious problem here. It may or may not be that the answer to that problem is to delete Sharkface's award center; I recognize that it's well-intentioned. But there needs to be further discussion. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:22, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes indeed, I agree that there needs to be more discussion. But MfD is not the venue for a discussion other than to delete it. Discussions on how to change or reform is already ongoing on the talk page, and bringing it to MfD while changes are being made is in bad faith. Also, I was asking your opinion as an admin, not an editor. If you were acting as an editor, I would have reverted you and told you to go to WP:DRV. So again, if I can have your opinion as to the articles fate. — _Maggot^Syn 08:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion as an admin is that you were too quick to close the debate. Hence, I reverted. Regarding the page itself, all that counts is my opinion as an editor, not the fact that I'm an admin. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see, so you don't want to answer. Thats fine too. I don't want to pressure you or anything. :) — _Maggot^Syn 08:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have given my opinion (a preliminary one, to be sure), as an editor, at the appropriate place. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]