Jump to content

Manipulation (psychology)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In psychology, manipulation is defined as an action designed to influence or control another person, usually in an underhanded or subtle manner which facilitates one's personal aims.[1] Methods someone may use to manipulate another person may include seduction, suggestion, coercion, and blackmail.[2][3][4] Manipulation is generally considered a dishonest form of social influence as it is used at the expense of others.[5] Humans are inherently capable of manipulative and deceptive behavior, with the main differences being that of specific personality characteristics or disorders.[6]

Differentiation

[edit]

Manipulation differs from general influence and persuasion.[7][8] Manipulation, unlike persuasion, typically involves exploiting the vulnerabilities of an individual.[9] Non-manipulative influence is generally perceived to be harmless and it is not seen as unduly coercive to the individual's right of acceptance or rejection of influence.[10] Persuasion is the ability to move others to a desired action, usually within the context of a specific goal. Persuasion often attempts to influence a person's beliefs, religion, motivations, or behavior. Influence and persuasion are neither viewed as positive nor negative, unlike manipulation which is viewed as negative.[11][12]

Elements of manipulation

[edit]

While the motivations for manipulation are mostly self-serving, certain styles of social influence can be intended to be to the benefit of others.[13] Manipulation can be defined as the use of strategies to further personal driven goals at the expense of others and is usually considered antisocial behavior.[13] Pro-social behavior is a voluntary act intended to help or benefit another individual or group of individuals and is an important part of empathy.[14][15]

Manipulative behavior is fundamentally intentional, with the manipulator knowing full well the consequences of their actions, and what they want out of the person being manipulated.[16]

Different measures of manipulativeness focus on different aspects or expressions of manipulation and tend to paint slightly different pictures of its predictors. Features such as low empathy, high narcissism, use of self-serving rationalizations, and an interpersonal style marked by high agency (dominance) and low communion (i.e. cold-heartedness) are consistent across measures.[17][18][19]

A study by Buss, et al. explored how individuals use manipulation to shape their environments to fit their personal characteristics. Across two studies, researchers identified six main manipulation tactics: charm, silent treatment, coercion, reason, regression, and debasement. These tactics were consistent across different situations, with charm commonly used to initiate behavior and coercion or silent treatment used to stop it. The use of these tactics was linked to personality traits such as Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Agreeableness, and was consistent across self-reports and observer ratings.[20] Another paper investigated the link between one's personality and social processes, and it concluded that "persons are not passive recipients of environmental presses" and that "persons actively avoid some social situations and selectively enter others", and that people "elicit and manipulate the social behavior of persons who reside in situations that have been selected."[21]

Harriet B. Braiker

[edit]

Harriet B. Braiker identified the following ways that manipulators control their victims, with some of them including positive reinforcement, which includes praise, superficial charm, superficial sympathy (crocodile tears), excessive apologizing or forced laugh or smile, negative reinforcement which involves removing one from a negative situation as a reward, gaslighting, punishing the victim, emotional blackmail, and guilt tripping.[22]

George K. Simon

[edit]

According to psychology author George K. Simon, successful psychological manipulation primarily involves the manipulator:[23]

  • Concealing aggressive intentions and behaviors and being affable.
  • Knowing the psychological vulnerabilities of the victim to determine which tactics are likely to be the most effective.
  • Having a sufficient level of ruthlessness to have no qualms about causing harm to the victim if necessary.

Simon states that manipulative individuals may use a variety of deceptive techniques to exert control or avoid accountability. One such method is lying by commission, where someone deliberately makes a false statement or provides misleading information with the intent to deceive. This involves actively stating something untrue rather than simply omitting the truth.[24] Manipulative tactics also include lying by omission, pretending to be in denial, where the manipulator refuses to admit any wrongdoing, rationalization, in which the manipulator justifies inappropriate behavior with seemingly logical excuses, selective inattention/selective attention, and diversion, which is a tactic in which the manipulator avoids giving a direct answer and instead steers the conversation toward a different topic.[25][26][27][28]

Martin Kantor

[edit]

Kantor advises in his 2006 book The Psychopathology of Everyday Life: How Antisocial Personality Disorder Affects All of Us that vulnerability to psychopathic manipulators can be due to being too dependent on others, having a lack of maturity, being naïve, impressionable, trusting, impulsive, altruistic, or greedy.[29]

Assessment tools

[edit]

MACH-IV

[edit]

Manipulativeness is a primary feature found in the Machiavellianism construct.[30][31] The MACH-IV, conceptualized by Richard Christie and Florence Geis, is a popular and widely used psychological measure of manipulative and deceptive behavior.[32]

Emotional manipulation scale

[edit]

The emotional manipulation scale is a ten-item questionnaire developed in 2006 through factor analysis, primarily to measure one's tendency to use emotions to their advantage in controlling others.[33] At the time of publication, emotional intelligence assessments did not specifically examine manipulative behavior and were instead predominantly focussed on Big Five personality trait assessment.[33]

Managing the emotions of others scale

[edit]

The "Managing the Emotions of Others Scale" (MEOS) was developed in 2013 through factor analysis to measure the ability to change emotions of others.[34] The survey questions measure six categories: mood (or emotional state) enhancement, mood worsening, concealing emotions, capacity for inauthenticity, poor emotion skills, and using diversion to enhance mood. The enhancement, worsening and diversion categories have been used to identify the ability and willingness of manipulative behavior.[13] The MEOS has also been used for assessing emotional intelligence, and has been compared to the HEXACO model of personality structure, for which the capacity for inauthenticity category in the MEOS was found to correspond to low honesty-humility scores on the HEXACO.[35]

The SD3 and the Dirty Dozen

[edit]

The dark triad Dirty Dozen and the Short Dark Triad (SD3 or simply D3) also measures a callous, manipulative, self oriented style.[36][37]

Other measures

[edit]

There are several measures that assess interpersonally manipulative characteristics. Measures of psychopathy and narcissism have their own subscales that address manipulation.[38][39][40][41] Other examples include the Honesty-Humility subscale on the HEXACO model of personality, the Agreeableness factor in the Big Five personality test, and on factors of the MMPI.[42][43][44]

Manipulation and personality disorders

[edit]

Manipulative tendencies may derive from cluster B personality disorders such as narcissistic personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and borderline personality disorder. Manipulative behavior has also been related with one's level of emotional intelligence.[13][45] Discussion of manipulation may vary depending on which behavior is specifically included, and whether one is referring to the general population or in clinical contexts.[46]

Antisocial personality disorder features deceit and manipulation of others as an explicit criterion. This runs the gamut of deception, from lying and superficial displays of charisma to frequent use of aliases and disguises, and criminal fraudulence.[4] The Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) in Section III of DSM-5 requires the presence of manipulative behaviour for a diagnosis of ASPD, with two symptoms (deceitfulness and manipulativeness) reflecting such tendencies out of the seven listed, with six being required for diagnosis (the others are impulsivity, irresponsibility, risk-taking, callousness and hostility).[4] The related syndrome of psychopathy also features pathological lying and manipulation for personal gain, as well as superficial charm, as cardinal features.[4]

Borderline personality disorder is unique in the grouping as "borderline" manipulation is characterized as unintentional and dysfunctional manipulation.[47] Marsha M. Linehan has stated that people with borderline personality disorder often exhibit behaviors which are not truly manipulative, but are erroneously interpreted as such.[48] According to Linehan, these behaviors often appear as unthinking manifestations of intense pain, and are often not deliberate as to be considered truly manipulative. In the DSM-5, manipulation was removed as a defining characteristic of borderline personality disorder.[47]

Conduct disorder is the appearance of antisocial behavior occurring in children and adolescents.[49] Individuals with this disorder are characterized by a lack of empathy, a low sense of guilt, and shallow emotionality. Aggression and violence are two factors that characterize individuals with this disorder. In order for a child to be diagnosed with this disorder, the behavior must be consistent for at least 12 months.[50]

Factitious disorder is a mental illness in which individuals purposely fake having symptoms of some condition, physically or psychologically. Fabricating illnesses allows individuals to feel a thrill[51] and receive free aid in hospital admissions and treatment. Feelings of persistence, abuse in early childhood, and excessive thoughts were common for these individuals who connected to Borderline Personality Disorder.[52]

Histrionic personality disorder is a personality disorder characterized by dramatic and attention seeking behavior. Individuals with the personality disorder exhibit inappropriate alluring tactics, and irregular emotional patterns. Histrionic symptoms include "seeking reassurance, switching emotional, and feeling uncomfortable." Histrionic and Narcissistic Personality Disorders overlap because decisions are sporadic and unreliable.[53]

Narcissistic personality disorder is characterized by a belief of superiority, exhibitionism, self-centeredness and a lack of empathy. Individuals with NPD can be charming but also show exploitive behaviors in the interpersonal domain. They are motivated by success, beauty, and may have feelings of entitlement.[54] Those with this disorder often engage in assertive self enhancement and antagonistic self-protection.[54] All of these factors can lead an individual with narcissistic personality disorder to manipulate others.

Under the ICD-11's dimensional model of personality pathology, deceitful, manipulative and exploitative behaviors are cardinal expressions of the lack of empathy domain of the Dissociality trait.[55]

Counters to manipulative behavior

[edit]

Many have proposed ways for potential victims to identify manipulation attempts and take action to prevent victimization.[56]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Manipulation. In Cambridge English Dictionary. Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/manipulation
  2. ^ Hamilton, J. Devance; Decker, Norman; Rumbaut, Ruben D. (1986). "The Manipulative Patient". American Journal of Psychotherapy. 40 (2): 189–200. doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1986.40.2.189. PMID 3728747. We define manipulation as deliberately influencing or controlling the behavior of others to one's own advantage by using charm, persuasion, seduction, deceit, guilt induction, or coercion.
  3. ^ "Manipulation". APA Dictionary of Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. n.d. Retrieved 10 October 2021.
  4. ^ a b c d Lynam, Donald R.; Vachon, David D. (2012). "Antisocial personality disorder in DSM-5: Missteps and missed opportunities". Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 3 (4): 483–495. doi:10.1037/per0000006. ISSN 1949-2723. PMID 23106185.
  5. ^ Ienca, Marcello (2023). "On Artificial Intelligence and Manipulation". Topoi. 42 (3): 833–842. doi:10.1007/s11245-023-09940-3. In this tradition, manipulation is considered ethically wrong because it involves influencing someone's behavior or beliefs in a non-transparent way that (i) undermines their autonomy, freedom, or dignity, (ii) promotes the personal gain of the manipulator at the expense of the manipulated, and (iii) may result in direct or indirect harm for the manipulated.
  6. ^
    • "That human beings should universally possess a talent for deceiving one another shouldn’t surprise us. Researchers speculate that lying as a behavior arose not long after the emergence of language." -----"Why We Lie: The Science Behind Our Deceptive Ways". National Geographic Society. 18 May 2017.
    • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2013). The H factor of personality: Why some people are manipulative, self-entitled, materialistic, and exploitive—and why it matters for everyone.
    • Ekman, P. (2009). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage (revised edition). WW Norton & Company.
    • DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Tang, J., & O'Brien, T. P. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177-202.
    • Bursten, B. (1972). The manipulative personality. Archives of general psychiatry, 26(4), 318-321.
  7. ^ Rudinow, Joel (1978). "Manipulation". Ethics. 88 (4): 338–347. doi:10.1086/292086.
  8. ^ https://books.google.com/books?id=1i55AgAAQBAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&lpg=PT246&dq=interpersonal-manipulation-nature-moral-limits-mark-seabright-dennis-moberg&pg=PT249#v=onepage&q&f=false
  9. ^ Van Dijk, Teun A. (2006). "Discourse and manipulation". Discourse & Society. 17 (3): 359–383. doi:10.1177/0957926506060250.
  10. ^ Nichols S. "The Ethics of Manipulation". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Retrieved 22 March 2020.
  11. ^ Duncan RD. "Influence Versus Manipulation: Understand The Difference". Forbes. Retrieved 21 December 2018.
  12. ^ Sinha, Ruchi (2022-01-26). "Are You Being Influenced or Manipulated?". Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Retrieved 2024-05-03.
  13. ^ a b c d Ngoc NN, Tuan NP, Takahashi Y (October 2020). "A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Manipulation". SAGE Open. 10 (4): 215824402097161. doi:10.1177/2158244020971615. ISSN 2158-2440. S2CID 228806921.
  14. ^ Rodriguez LM, Mesurado B, Moreno JE (2018-11-29). "Ethical Position, Empathy and Prosocial Behaviour Model: Its Contribution to Prevention and Psychotherapeutic Approaches of Antisocial Disorders". Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 273–286. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95360-1_22. ISBN 978-3-319-95359-5. S2CID 150110593.
  15. ^ Eisenberg N, Miller PA (January 1987). "The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors". Psychological Bulletin. 101 (1): 91–119. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91. PMID 3562705.
  16. ^ Kligman, M.; Culver, C. M. (1992). "An Analysis of Interpersonal Manipulation". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 17 (2): 173–197. doi:10.1093/jmp/17.2.173. PMID 1588243.
  17. ^ Miller, Joshua D.; Gentile, Brittany; Campbell, W. Keith (2013-07-01). "A Test of the Construct Validity of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory". Journal of Personality Assessment. 95 (4): 377–387. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.742903. ISSN 0022-3891. PMID 23186210. S2CID 36810335.
  18. ^ Grieve, Rachel; Mahar, Doug (2010-06-01). "The emotional manipulation–psychopathy nexus: Relationships with emotional intelligence, alexithymia and ethical position". Personality and Individual Differences. 48 (8): 945–950. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.028. ISSN 0191-8869.
  19. ^ Brunell, Amy B.; Buelow, Melissa T. (2018-03-01). "Homogenous scales of narcissism: Using the psychological entitlement scale, interpersonal exploitativeness scale, and narcissistic grandiosity scale to study narcissism". Personality and Individual Differences. 123: 182–190. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.029. ISSN 0191-8869.
  20. ^ Buss, David M.; Gomes, Mary; Higgins, Dolly S.; Lauterbach, Karen (1987). "Tactics of manipulation". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52 (6): 1219–1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1219. PMID 3598864.
  21. ^ Buss, David M. (1987). "Selection, evocation, and manipulation". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53 (6): 1214–1221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1214. PMID 3320336.
  22. ^ Braiker HB (2004). Who's Pulling Your Strings ? How to Break The Cycle of Manipulation. McGraw Hill Professional. ISBN 978-0-07-144672-3.
  23. ^ Simon GK (1996). In Sheep's Clothing: Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People. Parkhurst Brothers, Incorporated, Publishers. ISBN 978-1-935166-30-6. (reference for the entire section)
  24. ^ [[1](https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2016/12/true-lies) "True Lies: People Who Lie Via Telling Truth Viewed Harshly, Study Finds"]. Washington: American Psychological Association. 2016. {{cite news}}: Check |url= value (help)
  25. ^ [[2](https://www.drgeorgesimon.com/denial-manipulation-tactic-4/) "Denial - Manipulation Tactic 4"]. 24 September 2008. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  26. ^ [[3](https://www.drgeorgesimon.com/rationalizing-manipulation-tactic-2/) "Rationalizing - Manipulation Tactic 2"]. 17 September 2008. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  27. ^ [[4](https://www.drgeorgesimon.com/obstinate-denial-and-mental-filtering/) "Obstinate Denial and Mental Filtering"]. 18 August 2022. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  28. ^ [[5](https://www.drgeorgesimon.com/confronting-evasion-and-diversion-tactics/) "Confronting Evasion and Diversion Tactics"]. 30 March 2018. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  29. ^ Kantor M (2006). The Psychopathology of Everyday Life: How Antisocial Personality Disorder Affects All of Us. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-0-275-98798-5.
  30. ^ Jones DN, Paulhus DL (August 2017). "Duplicity among the dark triad: Three faces of deceit". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 113 (2): 329–342. doi:10.1037/pspp0000139. PMID 28253006. S2CID 30684586.
  31. ^ Abell L, Qualter P, Brewer G, Barlow A, Stylianou M, Henzi P, Barrett L (August 2015). "Why Machiavellianism Matters in Childhood: The Relationship Between Children's Machiavellian Traits and Their Peer Interactions in a Natural Setting". Europe's Journal of Psychology. 11 (3): 484–493. doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.957. PMC 4873058. PMID 27247672.
  32. ^ Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (2013). Studies in machiavellianism. Academic Press.
  33. ^ a b Austin EJ, Farrelly D, Black C, Moore H (July 2007). "Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side?". Personality and Individual Differences. 43 (1): 179–189. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.019. ISSN 0191-8869.
  34. ^ Austin EJ, O'Donnell MM (October 2013). "Development and preliminary validation of a scale to assess managing the emotions of others". Personality and Individual Differences. 55 (7): 834–839. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.005. hdl:20.500.11820/cea54d2e-9550-4226-b246-094288693428. ISSN 0191-8869.
  35. ^ Austin EJ, Vahle N (May 2016). "Associations of the Managing the Emotions of Others Scale (MEOS) with HEXACO personality and with trait emotional intelligence at the factor and facet level". Personality and Individual Differences. 94: 348–353. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.047. ISSN 0191-8869.
  36. ^ https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
  37. ^ Jonason, Peter K.; Webster, Gregory D. (2010). "The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad". Psychological Assessment. 22 (2): 420–432. doi:10.1037/a0019265. PMID 20528068.
  38. ^ https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3
  39. ^ Levenson, M.; Kiehl, K.; Fitzpatrick, C. (1995). "Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151-158.
  40. ^ https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590
  41. ^ https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12251
  42. ^ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467
  43. ^ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00351.x
  44. ^ https://books.google.com/books?id=utg5jCZRAqYC&lpg=PP2&ots=hDwiA3tILm&dq=Ben-Porath%2C%20Yossef%20(2012).%20%22Transitioning%20to%20the%20MMPI-2-RF%3A%20The%20Restructured%20Clinical%20(RC)%20Scales%22.%20Interpreting%20the%20MMPI-2-RF.%20Minneapolis%3A%20U%20of%20Minnesota%20Press.%20pp.%2039%E2%80%9396.&lr&pg=PA71#v=onepage&q&f=false
  45. ^ Kernberg O (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson. ISBN 978-0-87668-205-0.
  46. ^ Potter NN (April 2006). "What is manipulative behavior, anyway?". Journal of Personality Disorders. 20 (2): 139–156. doi:10.1521/pedi.2006.20.2.139. PMID 16643118.
  47. ^ a b Aguirre B (2016). "Borderline Personality Disorder: From Stigma to Compassionate Care". Stigma and Prejudice. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Humana Press, Cham. pp. 133–143. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27580-2_8. ISBN 9783319275789.
  48. ^ Staff writer(s). "On Manipulation with the Borderline Personality". ToddlerTime Network. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  49. ^ "Conduct Disorder".
  50. ^ Pisano S, Muratori P, Gorga C, Levantini V, Iuliano R, Catone G, et al. (September 2017). "Conduct disorders and psychopathy in children and adolescents: aetiology, clinical presentation and treatment strategies of callous-unemotional traits". Italian Journal of Pediatrics. 43 (1): 84. doi:10.1186/s13052-017-0404-6. PMC 5607565. PMID 28931400.
  51. ^ "Factitious disorder - Symptoms and causes". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 2023-08-28.
  52. ^ Carnahan, Kevin T.; Jha, Anupam (2022), "Factitious Disorder", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID 32491479, retrieved 2022-10-30
  53. ^ "Histrionic Personality Disorder". Psychology Today. 15 September 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  54. ^ a b Wetzel E, Leckelt M, Gerlach TM, Back MD (July 2016). "Distinguishing Subgroups of Narcissists with Latent Class Analysis". European Journal of Personality. 30 (4): 374–389. doi:10.1002/per.2062. ISSN 0890-2070. S2CID 151869472.
  55. ^ Bach, B., & First, M. B. (2018). Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders. BMC psychiatry, 18, 1-14.
  56. ^ Dunstan, James (2023) Manipulation and influence: a trickery account of manipulation applied to three scopes. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.

Further reading

[edit]
Wikiquote has quotations related to Manipulation (psychology).

Books

Academic papers

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manipulation_(psychology)&oldid=1292762355"