Sic: Revision history

3 June 2025

• curprev 00:3200:32, 3 June 2025 C.Fred talk contribs m 14,201 bytes −65 Reverted edit by 73.231.30.156 (talk) to last version by WriterArtistCoder undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 00:3200:32, 3 June 2025 73.231.30.156 talk 14,266 bytes +65 →Etymology and historical usage undo Tag: Reverted

22 May 2025

• curprev 00:3400:34, 22 May 2025 WriterArtistCoder talk contribs 14,201 bytes −6 →Use to denote archaisms and dialect: "sic" does not appear in that quote from dictionary, confusing. If there was a spelling error I missed in that quote, should be silently adjusted instead undo Tag: Visual edit

14 May 2025

• curprev 01:0201:02, 14 May 2025 PizzaStallion talk contribs 14,207 bytes −4 that hyperlink will never exist undo

8 May 2025

• curprev 16:4716:47, 8 May 2025 FaviFake talk contribs m 14,211 bytes 0 Too small to read and stretches the caption. Fixed undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

1 May 2025

• curprev 02:3402:34, 1 May 2025 Zefr talk contribs 14,211 bytes −4 Reverting edit(s) by 36.75.53.122 (talk) to rev. 1287762453 by 62.95.11.130: Vandalism (RW 16.1) undo Tags: RW Undo
• curprev 01:0201:02, 1 May 2025 36.75.53.122 talk 14,215 bytes +4 Fixed typo undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 April 2025

• curprev 09:0109:01, 28 April 2025 62.95.11.130 talk 14,211 bytes −200 Undid revision 1287305381 by Arjayay (talk) Restore previous example to avoid self-promotion (possible conflict of interest). undo Tag: references removed

25 April 2025

• curprev 10:3310:33, 25 April 2025 Arjayay talk contribs m 14,411 bytes +583 Undid revision 1287290691 by 62.95.11.138 (talk) Valid example undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 07:2407:24, 25 April 2025 62.95.11.138 talk 13,828 bytes −583 remove self promotion undo Tag: Reverted

21 March 2025

• curprev 01:1201:12, 21 March 2025 B3stJ talk contribs m 14,411 bytes 0 Change capitalization. undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

27 January 2025

• curprev 05:5005:50, 27 January 2025 HeyElliott talk contribs 14,411 bytes +8 MOS:FOREIGNITALIC undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

14 January 2025

• curprev 22:2322:23, 14 January 2025 Mlkj talk contribs m 14,403 bytes +1 Reverted edits by 191.110.78.179 (talk) (HG) (3.4.13) undo Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 22:2322:23, 14 January 2025 191.110.78.179 talk 14,402 bytes −1 a undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

14 December 2024

• curprev 06:1306:13, 14 December 2024 Dolphinian6 talk contribs 14,403 bytes +10 Fixed grammar undo Tags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source

21 October 2024

• curprev 06:5406:54, 21 October 2024 Apaugasma talk contribs 14,393 bytes −3 Restored revision 1251885562 by Adamster524 (talk): Why this poorly known more general category (adverbial ) when we already have a well known more specific category (adverb)? undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 06:0406:04, 21 October 2024 LukeStenger talk contribs 14,396 bytes −10 Fixed html tag error undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 04:5904:59, 21 October 2024 98.19.205.169 talk 14,406 bytes +13 →top: Added links plus 5 sg undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source

18 October 2024

• curprev 16:5116:51, 18 October 2024 Pocoraven talk contribs m 14,393 bytes +6 made the example have a bold sic. undo

15 October 2024

• curprev 11:3711:37, 15 October 2024 Isochrone talk contribs 14,387 bytes 0 move up undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• curprev 11:3611:36, 15 October 2024 Isochrone talk contribs 14,387 bytes −343 the example box below seems sufficient undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• curprev 01:0901:09, 15 October 2024 Johnn Francis talk contribs m 14,730 bytes +4 Phrasing. undo

4 October 2024

• curprev 04:2504:25, 4 October 2024 Renamed user e95c6733749c212cae03611a7eb5cea8 talk contribs m 14,726 bytes +8 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit

13 September 2024

• curprev 23:1923:19, 13 September 2024 Anachronist talk contribs 14,718 bytes +4 Undid revision 1245595749 by 174.249.176.244 (talk) - red link is OK as it may be an article someday undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 23:0023:00, 13 September 2024 174.249.176.244 talk 14,714 bytes −4 Remove dead link undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

9 September 2024

• curprev 08:1808:18, 9 September 2024 Xblkx talk contribs 14,718 bytes +18 clarifications undo

4 September 2024

• curprev 06:0506:05, 4 September 2024 Joe vom Titan talk contribs m 14,700 bytes 0 →Folk etymologies: Moved reference to the half-sentence supported by the reference. The rest of this paragraph remains unsourced. undo

15 August 2024

• curprev 20:0120:01, 15 August 2024 Pink Bee talk contribs m 14,700 bytes +4 ce undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App select source

7 August 2024

• curprev 13:5013:50, 7 August 2024 Apaugasma talk contribs 14,696 bytes −18 Undid revision 1239020649 by Meganium39 (talk) Wikipedia:Short descriptions do not serve to define the subject, but to concisely identify and disambiguate it; they should generally also be 40 characters at maximum undo Tag: Undo

6 August 2024

• curprev 22:4022:40, 6 August 2024 Meganium39 talk contribs m 14,714 bytes +18 Updated short description undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App description change

19 July 2024

• curprev 21:4021:40, 19 July 2024 Mlkj talk contribs m 14,696 bytes +251 Reverted good faith edits by Tylerkipp (talk): I think the previous example is a bit more encyclopedic. It's nice to explain it very plainly, but I feel like the rest of the article already had more than enough explanation, it doesn't need to be explained again in the quote? (HG) (3.4.13) undo Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 21:3521:35, 19 July 2024 Tylerkipp talk contribs 14,445 bytes −199 Improved the example, as the previous example gave no context whatsoever to how sic was being used. It just appears as a general quote with the word (sic) in it. The new example gives a much better understanding of how the term sic is actually used. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
• curprev 21:2421:24, 19 July 2024 Tylerkipp talk contribs 14,644 bytes −52 the original introduction is extremely inconcise for a term used all over Wikipedia, to explain to readers what it means. I read the entire article and could still not fathom what the word sic meant until I looked it up online through other sources. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

17 July 2024

• curprev 15:2215:22, 17 July 2024 Apaugasma talk contribs 14,696 bytes −19 Undid revision 1234967122 by Kierkat10 (talk) yes, it may include capitalization, but it may also include many other things which would simply be wp:undue to mention in the lead, or even at all (readers can infer certain things) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 14:4714:47, 17 July 2024 Paul W talk contribs m 14,715 bytes −10 Reverted 1 edit by I am in the Sic Building (talk) to last revision by Kierkat10 undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 14:4114:41, 17 July 2024 I am in the Sic Building talk contribs 14,725 bytes +10 Sick Building undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 02:1402:14, 17 July 2024 Kierkat10 talk contribs m 14,715 bytes +19 added capitalization to odd things that may be included in [sic] (i could be wrong though) undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

7 July 2024

• curprev 09:0509:05, 7 July 2024 SilverLocust talk contribs 14,696 bytes +10 improve SCOTUS case cite undo

15 June 2024

• curprev 20:0920:09, 15 June 2024 Arjayay talk contribs m 14,686 bytes −4 Duplicate word removed undo
• curprev 18:1418:14, 15 June 2024 Anachronist talk contribs 14,690 bytes +3 →top: fixed poor grammar from anon's last edit undo
• curprev 13:2013:20, 15 June 2024 2601:240:d900:ff00:f88d:689b:955:978a talk 14,687 bytes −128 c/e encyclopedic style, correct terms, npov. undo

21 May 2024

• curprev 00:5000:50, 21 May 2024 Mph703 talk contribs 14,815 bytes +325 Added image and caption undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

18 May 2024

• curprev 05:1105:11, 18 May 2024 Eebster the Great talk contribs 14,490 bytes −2 →Formatting: There is no evidence cited one way or another as to whether roman, italic, or oblique type is more "usual," but certainly both forms are often used. Also, the parentheses surrounding "sic" are not italicized in the cited source. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 05:0205:02, 18 May 2024 Eebster the Great talk contribs m 14,492 bytes 0 Using standard formatting according to following section undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

14 May 2024

• curprev 10:3510:35, 14 May 2024 Apaugasma talk contribs 14,492 bytes −23 Undid revision 1223762721 by 綾波れい (talk) rv unsourced addition; please also see Talk:Sic#'Sic erat scriptum' redux undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 05:3305:33, 14 May 2024 綾波れい talk contribs 14,515 bytes +23 Add abbreviation decoding undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

8 May 2024

• curprev 09:0809:08, 8 May 2024 Apaugasma talk contribs 14,492 bytes +369 Undid revision 1222743094 by רמרום (talk) rv: not sure if there was a further rationale for removal (bad source?), but only based on its contents this was useful information on how to use 'recte' undo Tag: Undo

7 May 2024

• curprev 17:2317:23, 7 May 2024 רמרום talk contribs 14,123 bytes −369 removal of trivial/insignificant detail(Journal of Seventeenth-Century Music Style Sheet) undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

4 May 2024

• curprev 21:0621:06, 4 May 2024 Apaugasma talk contribs 14,492 bytes −1 Undid revision 1222253471 by TrippBB (talk) no, like that it' s not a full sentence anymore undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 21:0121:01, 4 May 2024 TrippBB talk contribs 14,493 bytes +1 Indicate needs to be replaced with indicating undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit