Jump to content

Soil structure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In geotechnical engineering, soil structure describes the arrangement of the solid parts of the soil and of the pore space located between them. It is determined by how individual soil granules clump, bind together, and aggregate, resulting in the arrangement of soil pores between them. Soil has a major influence on water and air movement, biological activity, root growth and seedling emergence. There are several different types of soil structure. It is inherently a dynamic and complex system that is affected by different biotic and abiotic factors.[1]

Overview

[edit]

Soil structure describes the arrangement of the solid parts of the soil and of the pore spaces located between them.[2][3] Aggregation is the result of the interaction of soil particles through rearrangement, flocculation and cementation. It is enhanced by:[3][4] the precipitation of oxides, hydroxides, carbonates and silicates; the products of biological activity (such as biofilms, fungal hyphae and glycoproteins); ionic bridging between negatively charged particles (both clay minerals and organic compounds) by multivalent cations; and interactions between organic compounds (hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic bonding).

The quality of soil structure will decline under most forms of cultivation; the associated mechanical mixing of the soil compacts and shears aggregates and fills pore spaces;[5] it also exposes organic matter to a greater rate of decay and oxidation.[6] A further consequence of continued cultivation and traffic is the development of compacted, impermeable layers or hardpans within the soil profile.[7]

The decline of soil structure under irrigation is usually related to the breakdown of aggregates and dispersion of clay material as a result of rapid wetting. This is particularly so if soils are sodic; that is, having a high exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) of the cations attached to the clays. High sodium levels (compared to high calcium levels) cause particles to repel one another when wet, and the associated aggregates to disaggregate and disperse. The ESP will increase if irrigation causes salty water (even of low concentration) to gain access to the soil.[8]

A wide range of practices are undertaken to preserve and improve soil structure. For example, the New South Wales Department of Land and Water Conservation advocates: increasing organic content by incorporating pasture phases into cropping rotations; reducing or eliminating tillage in cropping and pasture activities; avoiding soil disturbance during periods of excessive dry or wet when soils may accordingly tend to shatter or smear; and ensuring sufficient ground cover to protect the soil from raindrop impact and subsequent slaking. In irrigated agriculture, it may be recommended to: apply gypsum (calcium sulfate) to displace sodium cations with calcium and so reduce ESP or sodicity, avoid rapid wetting, and avoid disturbing soils when too wet or dry.[9]

Types

[edit]

The main types of soil structures are:

  • Platy – The units are flat and platelike. They are generally oriented horizontally.[10]
  • Prismatic – The individual units are bounded by flat to rounded vertical faces. Units are distinctly longer vertically, and the faces are typically casts or molds of adjoining units. Vertices are angular or subrounded; the tops of the prisms are somewhat indistinct and normally flat.[10]
  • Columnar – The units are similar to prisms and bounded by flat or slightly rounded vertical faces. The tops of columns, in contrast to those of prisms, are very distinct and normally rounded.[10]
  • Blocky – The units are blocklike or polyhedral. They are bounded by flat or slightly rounded surfaces that are casts of the faces of surrounding peds. Typically, blocky structural units are nearly equidimensional but grade to prisms and plates. The structure is described as angular blocky if the faces intersect at relatively sharp angles and as subangular blocky if the faces are a mixture of rounded and plane faces and the corners are mostly rounded.[10]
  • Granular – The units are approximately spherical or polyhedral. They are bounded by curved or very irregular faces that are not casts of adjoining peds.[10]
  • Wedge – The units are approximately elliptical with interlocking lenses that terminate in acute angles. They are commonly bounded by small slickensides.[10]
  • Lenticular —The units are overlapping lenses parallel to the soil surface. They are thickest in the middle and thin towards the edges. Lenticular structure is commonly associated with moist soils, texture classes high in silt or very fine sand (e.g., silt loam), and high potential for frost action.[10]

Platy

[edit]

In platy structure, the units are flat and platelike. They are generally oriented horizontally. A special form, lenticular platy structure, is recognized for plates that are thickest in the middle and thin toward the edges. Platy structure is usually found in subsurface soils that have been subject to compaction by animal trampling[11] or machinery traffic,[12] but platy structures may also result from wetting-drying[13] and freeze-thaw cycles where they are of the lenticular type.[14] The plates can be separated with a little effort by prying the horizontal layers with a pen knife. Platy structure tends to impede the downward movement of water[15] and plant roots[16] through the soil.

Prismatic

[edit]

In the prismatic structure, the individual units are bounded by flat to rounded vertical faces. Units are distinctly longer vertically, and the faces are typically casts or molds of adjoining units. Vertices are angular or subrounded; the tops of the prisms are somewhat indistinct and normally flat. Prismatic structures are characteristic of clay- illuviated B horizons or subsoils. The vertical cracks result from freeze-thaw and wetting-drying cycles.[17] They allow the downward movement of water and roots.[18]

Columnar

[edit]

In the columnar structure, the units are similar to prisms and are bounded by flat or slightly rounded vertical faces. The tops of columns, in contrast to those of prisms, are very distinct and normally rounded. Columnar structure is common in the subsoil of sodium affected soils[19] and soils rich in swelling clays such as the smectites and the kandite Halloysite.[20] Columnar structure is very dense and it is very difficult for plant roots to penetrate these layers. Techniques such as deep plowing have helped to restore some degree of fertility to these soils.[21]

Blocky

[edit]

In blocky structure, the structural units are blocklike or polyhedral. They are bounded by flat or slightly rounded surfaces that are casts of the faces of surrounding peds. Typically, blocky structural units are nearly equidimensional but grade to prisms and to plates. The structure is described as angular blocky if the faces intersect at relatively sharp angles; as subangular blocky if the faces are a mixture of rounded and plane faces and the corners are mostly rounded. Blocky structures are common in subsoil but also occur in surface soils that have a high clay content. The strongest blocky structure is formed as a result of swelling and shrinking of the clay minerals which produce cracks.[22] Sometimes the surface of dried-up sloughs and ponds shows characteristic cracking and peeling due to clays.[23]

Granular

[edit]

In the granular structure, also called crumby or crumb structure, the structural units are approximately spherical or polyhedral and are bounded by curved or very irregular faces that are not casts of adjoining peds. In other words, they look like cookie crumbs. Granular structure is common in the surface soils of rich grasslands and highly amended garden soils with high organic matter content.[24] Soil mineral particles are both separated and bridged by organic matter breakdown products,[25] root and microbial exudates,[26][27] and animal excreta,[28] making the soil easy to work. Cultivation,[29] earthworms,[30] frost action[31] and rodents[32] mix the soil and decrease the size of the peds. This structure allows for good porosity and easy movement of air and water. This combination of ease in tillage, good moisture and air handling capabilities, and good structure for planting and germination, are definitive of the phrase good tilth, a prominent component of soil health.[33]

Improvement

[edit]

The benefits of improving soil structure (i.e. tending to granular structure) for the growth of plants, particularly in an agricultural setting, include: reduced erosion due to greater soil aggregate strength[34] and decreased overland flow;[35] improved root penetration and access to soil moisture and nutrients;[36] improved emergence of seedlings due to reduced crusting of the surface;[37] and greater water infiltration, retention and water availability due to improved porosity.[38]

Productivity from irrigated no-tillage or minimum tillage soil management in horticulture usually decreases over time due to degradation of the soil structure, inhibiting root growth and water retention. There are a few exceptions, why such exceptional fields retain structure is unknown, but it is associated with high organic matter. Improving soil structure in such settings can increase yields significantly.[39] The New South Wales Department of Land and Water Conservation suggests that in cropping systems, wheat yields can be increased by 10 kg/ha for every extra millimetre of rain that is able to infiltrate due to soil structure.[9]

Several techniques exist or have been suggested to improve soil structure, all of them tending to increase either porosity, organic matter content and/or soil microbial and faunal activity, i.e. all features associated with good granular/crumb structure.[40] Incorporating or depositing organic matter (e.g. mulch, manure, compost) has been practiced since the beginning of sedentary agriculture,[41] favouring aggregation through the formation of stable bridges between mineral particles.[42] In tropical areas, the fast rate of organic matter mineralization under warm/moist climate prevents using manure, mulch or compost for improving soil structure.[43] Organic matter was favourably replaced by charcoal, a source of black carbon, known for its longevity and stable links with clay minerals.[44] Charcoal addition has been practiced by Amerindians during Pre-colombian times in the so-called Terra preta areas, also known as Amazonian Dark Earths.[45] Biochar is a present-day application of this ancestral technique.[46] Liming, either practised alone[47] or in association with organic matter,[48] increases soil porosity and aggregation thanks to the bridging capacity of the divalent calcium cation towards negatively charged clay particles and organic molecules.[49] Calcium also protects organic matter from mineralization, stabilizing it within aggregates.[50] Several cultural techniques have been employed for a long time to stimulate aeration and soil biological activty in waterlogged soils, thereby shifting soil structure from compact types (e.g. lenticular) to granular along rows where crops were planted or sown. Although they differ according to countries and epochs, all of them allow the cultivated part of the soil profile to be at distance from the phreatic zone and thus better aerated: ridge-tillage,[51] a form of conservation tillage, is an example. The penetration of burrowing earthworms in areas deprived of them (e.g. in recent polders) has been observed to improve soil structure.[52] The introduction of European earthworms in earthworm-free areas improved soil structure and increased to a great extent the productivity of New Zealand pastures.[53] The Earthworm Inoculation Unit (EIU) technique has been suggested as an efficient and cost-friendly method to become an integral component of sustainable land restoration practice.[54]

Hardsetting soil

[edit]

Hardsetting soils lose their structure when wet and then set hard as they dry out to form a structureless mass that is very difficult to cultivate. They can only be tilled when their moisture content is within a limited range. When they are tilled the result is often a very cloddy surface (poor tilth). As they dry out the high soil strength often restricts seedling and root growth. Infiltration rates are low and runoff of rain and irrigation limits the productivity of many hardsetting soils.[55]

Definition

[edit]

Hardsetting has been defined this way: "A hardsetting horizon is one that sets to an almost homogeneous mass on drying. It may have occasional cracks, typically at a spacing of >0.1 m. Air dry hardset soil is hard and brittle, and it is not possible to push a forefinger into the profile face. Typically, it has a tensile strength of 90 kN–2. Soils that crust are not necessarily hardsetting since a hardsetting horizon is thicker than a crust. (In cultivated soils the thickness of the hardsetting horizon is frequently equal to or greater than that of the cultivated layer.) Hardsetting soil is not permanently cemented and is soft when wet. The clods in a hardsetting horizon that has been cultivated will partially or totally disintegrate upon wetting. If the soil has been sufficiently wetted, it will revert to its hardset state on drying. This can happen after flood irrigation or a single intense rainfall event."[56]

Soil structure dynamics

[edit]

Soil structure is inherently a dynamic and complex system that is affected by different factors such as tillage,[57] wheel traffic,[58] root, microbial and faunal activities in soil,[59][60] rainfall events,[61] wind erosion,[62] wetting and drying,[63] freezing and thawing. In turn, reciprocally soil structure interacts and affects the root growth and function, soil fauna and biota, water and solute transport processes, gas exchange, thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity, traffic bearing capacity, and many other aspects in relation with soil. Ignoring soil structure or viewing it as "static" can lead to poor predictions of soil properties and might significantly affect the soil management.[64]

See also

[edit]
  • Soil health – A state of soil, meeting ecosystem functions
  • Soil resilience – Ability of a soil to resist or recover their healthy state in response to destabilising influences

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Bronick, C.J.; Lal, Rattan (January 2005). "Soil structure and management: a review". Geoderma. 124 (1–2): 3–22. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005. Retrieved 13 June 2025.
  2. ^ Marshall, Theo John; Holmes, John Winspere; Rose, Calvin W. (1996). Soil physics (3rd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 10 June 2025.
  3. ^ a b Dexter, Anthony Roger (June 1988). "Advances in characterization of soil structure". Soil and Tillage Research. 11 (3–4): 199–238. Bibcode:1988STilR..11..199D. doi:10.1016/0167-1987(88)90002-5. Retrieved 10 June 2025.
  4. ^ Masoom, Hussain; Courtier-Murias, Denis; Farooq, Hashim; Soong, Ronald; Kelleher, Brian P.; Zhang, Chao; Maas, Werner E.; Fey, Michael; Kumar, Rajeev; Monette, Martine; Stronks, Henry J.; Simpson, Myrna J.; Simpson, André J. (16 February 2016). "Soil organic matter in its native state: unravelling the most complex biomaterial on Earth". Environmental Science and Technology. 50 (4): 1670–80. Bibcode:2016EnST...50.1670M. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03410. PMID 26783947. Retrieved 10 June 2025.
  5. ^ Skvortsova, Elena Borisovna (November 2009). "Changes in the geometric structure of pores and aggregates as indicators of the structural degradation of cultivated soils". Eurasian Soil Science. 42 (11): 1254–62. doi:10.1134/S1064229309110088. Retrieved 10 June 2025.
  6. ^ Golchin, Ahmad; Clarke, Paris; Oades, J. Malcolm; Skjemstad, Jan O. (December 1995). "The effects of cultivation on the composition of organic-matter and structural stability of soils". Australian Journal of Soil Research. 33 (6): 975–93. doi:10.1071/SR9950975. Retrieved 10 June 2025.
  7. ^ Reyes, Alam Ramirez; Heitman, Josh; Vepraskas, Michael; Ozlu, Ekrem (2023). "Soil management practices to reduce hardpans and compaction in sandy soils of North Carolina, USA". In Hartemink, Alfred E.; Huang, Jingyi (eds.). Sandy soils. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 201–10. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
  8. ^ Murray, Robert S.; Grant, Cameron D. (July 2007). The impact of irrigation on soil structure (PDF). Canberra, Australia: The National Program for Sustainable Irrigation, Land & Water Australia, Australian Government. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
  9. ^ a b "Field indicators of soil structure decline" (PDF). 1991. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Soil Science Division Staff, ed. (March 2017). "Examination and description of soil profiles §Soil structure" (PDF). USDA Soil Survey Manual. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. pp. 155–163. Archived from the original on 2018-09-07. Retrieved 12 June 2025.
  11. ^ Martı́nez, Luis Joel; Zinck, Joseph Alfred (January 2004). "Temporal variation of soil compaction and deterioration of soil quality in pasture areas of Colombian Amazonia". Soil and Tillage Research. 75 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1016/j.still.2002.12.001. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
  12. ^ Boizard, Hubert; Yoon, Sung Won; Léonard, Joël; Lheureux, Sylvain; Cousin, Isabelle; Roger-Estrade, Jean; Richard, Guy (March 2013). "Using a morphological approach to evaluate the effect of traffic and weather conditions on the structure of a loamy soil in reduced tillage". Soil and Tillage Research. 127: 34–44. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.04.007. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
  13. ^ Sasal, María Carolina; Léonard, Joël; Andriulo, Adrián; Boizard, Hubert (November 2017). "A contribution to understanding the origin of platy structure in silty soils under no tillage". Soil and Tillage Research. 173: 42–8. doi:10.1016/j.still.2016.08.017. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
  14. ^ Taina, Ioana A.; Heck, Richard J.; Deen, William; Ma, Eddie Y.T. (31 May 2013). "Quantification of freeze-thaw related structure in cultivated topsoils using X-ray computer tomography". Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 93 (4): 533–53. doi:10.4141/cjss2012-044.
  15. ^ Lilly, Allan (March 2000). "The relationship between field-saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil structure: development of class pedotransfer functions". Soil Use and Management. 16 (1): 56–60. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2000.tb00174.x. Retrieved 11 June 2025.
  16. ^ McGarry, Declan (1990). "Soil compaction and cotton growth on a vertisol". Australian Journal of Soil Research. 28 (6): 869–77. doi:10.1071/SR9900869. Retrieved 13 June 2025.
  17. ^ Harper, Horace J. (1938). "Factors which affect the development of prismatic structure in soils of the southern Great Plains". Soil Science Society of America Proceedings. 2 (C): 447–53. doi:10.2136/sssaj1938.036159950002000C0071x. Retrieved 13 June 2025.
  18. ^ Hasegawa, Shuichi; Sato, Taiichirow (May 1987). "Water uptake by roots in cracks and water movement in clayey subsoil". Soil Science. 143 (5): 381–86. doi:10.1097/00010694-198705000-00008. Retrieved 13 June 2025.
  19. ^ Soil Survey Staff, ed. (2022). Keys to soil taxonomy (PDF) (13th ed.). Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. p. 60. Retrieved 13 June 2025.
  20. ^ Elsass, Françoise; Dubroeucq, Didier; Thiry, Médard (June 2000). "Diagenesis of silica minerals from clay minerals in volcanic soils of Mexico". Clay Minerals. 35 (3): 477–89. doi:10.1180/000985500546954. Retrieved 13 June 2025.
  21. ^ Grevers, Mike C.J.; De Jong, Eeltje (June 1992). "Soil structure changes in subsoiled solonetzic and chernozemic soils measured by image analysis". Geoderma. 53 (3–4): 289–307. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(92)90060-K. Retrieved 13 June 2025.
  22. ^ Southard, Randal J.; Buol, Stanley W. (July–August 1988). "Subsoil blocky structure formation in some North Carolina paleudults and paleaquults". Soil Science Society of America Journal. 52 (4): 1069–76. doi:10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200040032x. Retrieved 16 June 2025.
  23. ^ Armenteros, Ildefonso; Daley, Brian (August 1998). "Pedogenic modification and structure evolution in palustrine facies as exemplified by the Bembridge Limestone (Late Eocene) of the Isle of Wight, southern England". Sedimentary Geology. 119 (3–4): 275–95. doi:10.1016/S0037-0738(98)00067-0. Retrieved 16 June 2025.
  24. ^ Malo, Douglas D. (2006). "Grasslands Soils". In Lal, Rattan (ed.). Encyclopedia of soil science (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: Taylor & Francis. pp. 777–81. Retrieved 16 June 2025.
  25. ^ Hufschmid, Ryan; Newcomb, Christina J.; Grate, Jay W.; De Yoreo, James J.; Browning, Nigel D.; Qafoku, Nikolla P. (30 March 2017). "Direct visualization of aggregate morphology and dynamics in a model soil organic-mineral system" (PDF). Environmental Science & Technology Letters. 4 (5): 186–91. doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00068. Retrieved 16 June 2025.
  26. ^ Shabtai, Itamar A.; Hafner, Benjamin D.; Schweizer, Steffen A.; Höschen, Carmen; Possinger, Angela; Lehmann, Johannes; Bauerle, Taryn (13 November 2024). "Root exudates simultaneously form and disrupt soil organo-mineral associations". Communications Earth & Environment. 5: 699. doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01879-6.
  27. ^ Pucetaite, Milda; Hitchcock, Adam; Obst, Martin; Persson, Per; Hammer, Edith C. (September 2022). "Nanoscale chemical mapping of exometabolites at fungal-mineral interfaces". Geobiology. 20 (5): 650–66. doi:10.1111/gbi.12504.
  28. ^ Guhra, Tom; Stolze, Katharina; Schweizer, Steffen; Totsche, Kai Uwe (June 2020). "Earthworm mucus contributes to the formation of organo-mineral associations in soil". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 145: 107785. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107785. Retrieved 16 June 2025.
  29. ^ Berntsen, Rolf; Berre, B. (February 2002). "Soil fragmentation and the efficiency of tillage implements". Soil and Tillage Research. 64 (1–2): 137–47. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00251-3. Retrieved 16 June 2025.
  30. ^ Larink, Otto; Werner, D.; Langmaack, Marcus; Schrader, Stefan (May 2001). "Regeneration of compacted soil aggregates by earthworm activity". Biology and Fertility of Soils. 33: 395–401. doi:10.1007/s003740100340. Retrieved 16 June 2025.
  31. ^ Leuther, Frederic; Schlüter, Steffen (2021). "Impact of freeze-thaw cycles on soil structure and soil hydraulic properties". Soil. 7 (1): 179–91. doi:10.5194/soil-7-179-2021.
  32. ^ Whitford, Walter G.; Kay, Fenton R. (February 1999). "Biopedturbation by mammals in deserts: a review". Journal of Arid Environments. 41 (2): 203–30. doi:10.1006/jare.1998.0482. Retrieved 16 June 2025.
  33. ^ Magdoff, Fred (2002). "Concept, components, and strategies of soil health in agroecosystems". Journal of Nematology. 33 (4): 169–72. Retrieved 17 June 2025.
  34. ^ Abu-Hamdeh, Nidal H.; Abo-Qudais, Saad Ahmad; Othman, Amal M. (October 2006). "Effect of soil aggregate size on infiltration and erosion characteristics". European Journal of Soil Science. 57 (5): 609–16. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00743.x. Retrieved 17 June 2025.
  35. ^ Palmer, Robert C.; Smith, Richard C. (December 2013). "Soil structural degradation in SW England and its impact on surface-water runoff generation". Soil Use and Management. 29 (4): 567–75. doi:10.1111/sum.12068. Retrieved 17 June 2025.
  36. ^ Gao, Weida; Hodgkinson, Laura; Jin, Kemo; Watts, Chris W.; Ashton, Rhys W.; Shen, Jianbo; Ren, Tusheng; Dodd, Ian C.; Binley, Andrew; Phillips, A. L.; Hedden, Peter; Hawkesford, Malcolm J.; Whalley, W. Richard (August 2016). "Deep roots and soil structure". Plant, Cell & Environment. 39 (8): 1662–8. doi:10.1111/pce.12684.
  37. ^ Taki, Orang; Godwin, Richard John; Leeds-Harrison, Peter B. (March 2006). "The creation of longitudinal cracks in shrinking soils to enhance seedling emergence. I. The effect of soil structure". Soil Use and Management. 22 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2005.00005.x. Retrieved 17 June 2025.
  38. ^ Pagliai, Marcello; Vignozzi, Nadia; Pellegrini, Sergio (December 2004). "Soil structure and the effect of management practices". Soil and Tillage Research. 79 (2): 131–43. doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.07.002. Retrieved 17 June 2025.
  39. ^ Cockroft, Bruce; Olsson, Kenneth A. (2000). "Degradation of soil structure due to coalescence of aggregates in no-till, no-traffic beds in irrigated crops". Australian Journal of Soil Research. 38 (1): 61–70. doi:10.1071/SR99079. Retrieved 17 June 2025.
  40. ^ Arocena, Joselito M.; Van Mourik, Jan M.; Cano, Ángel Faz (1 January 2012). "Granular soil structure indicates reclamation of degraded to productive soils: a case study in southeast Spain". Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 92 (1): 243–51. doi:10.4141/cjss2011-017.
  41. ^ Wallin, Jan-Erik (December 1996). "History of sedentary farming in Ångermanland, northern Sweden, during the Iron Age and Medieval period based on pollen analytical investigations". Vegetation History and Archaeobotany. 5 (4): 301–12. doi:10.1007/BF00195298. Retrieved 18 June 2025.
  42. ^ Kleber, Markus; Eusterhues, Karin; Keiluweit, Marco; Mikutta, Christian; Mikutta, Robert; Nico, Peter S. (2015). "Mineral–organic associations: formation, properties, and relevance in soil environments". In Sparks, Donald L. (ed.). Advances in agronomy. Vol. 130. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 1–140. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.005. Retrieved 18 June 2025.
  43. ^ Ross, Sheila M. (September 1993). "Organic matter in tropical soils: current conditions, concerns andprospects for conservation". Progress in Physical Geography. 17 (3): 265–305. doi:10.1177/030913339301700301. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  44. ^ Czimczik, Claudia I.; Masiello, Caroline A. (September 2007). "Controls on black carbon storage in soils". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 21 (3). doi:10.1029/2006GB002798.
  45. ^ Glaser, Bruno; Haumaier, Ludwig; Guggenberger, Georg; Zech, Wolfgang (7 February 2014). "The 'Terra Preta' phenomenon: a model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics". Naturwissenschaften. 88 (1): 37–41. doi:10.1007/s001140000193. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  46. ^ Schmidt, Hans-Peter; Kammann, Claudia; Hagemann, Nikolas; Leifeld, Jens; Bucheli, Thomas D.; Monedero, Miguel Angel Sánchez; Cayuela, Maria Luz (November 2021). "Biochar in agriculture: a systematic review of 26 global meta-analyses". Global Change Biology Bioenergy. 13 (11): 1708–30. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12889.
  47. ^ Schack-Kirchner, Helmer; Hildebrand, Ernst E. (7 February 1998). "Changes in soil structure and aeration due to liming and acid irrigation". Plant and Soil. 199 (1): 167–76. doi:10.1023/A:1004290226402. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  48. ^ Wuddivira, Mark N.; Camps-Roach, Geremy (June 2007). "Effects of organic matter and calcium on soil structural stability". European Journal of Soil Science. 58 (3): 722–27. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00861.x. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  49. ^ Conradi, Elio Jr; Gonçalves, Affonso Celso; Seidel, Edleusa Pereira; Ziemer, Guilherme Lindner; Zimmermann, Juliano; Dias de Oliveira, Vinícius Henrique; Schwantes, Daniel; Zeni, Carlos Daniel (2020). "Effects of liming on soil physical attributes: a review". Journal of Agricultural Science. 12 (10): 278. doi:10.5539/jas.v12n10p278.
  50. ^ Rowley, Mike C.; Grand, Stéphanie; Verrecchia, Éric P. (19 December 2017). "Calcium-mediated stabilisation of soil organic carbon". Biogeochemistry. 137 (1–2): 27–49. doi:10.1007/s10533-017-0410-1. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  51. ^ Tisdall, Judith M. C.; Hodgson, John Michael (November 1990). "Ridge tillage in Australia: a review". Soil and Tillage Research. 18 (2–3): 127–44. doi:10.1016/0167-1987(90)90055-I. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  52. ^ Marinissen, Joke C. Y. (November 1994). "Earthworm populations and stability of soil structure in a silt loam soil of a recently reclaimed polder in the Netherlands". Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 51 (1–2): 75–87. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(94)90035-3. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  53. ^ Stockdill, S. M. J. (January 1982). "Effects of introduced earthworms on the productivity of New Zealand pastures". Pedobiologia. 24 (1): 29–35. doi:10.1016/S0031-4056(23)05863-8. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  54. ^ Butt, Kevin R.; Frederickson, James; Morris, Richard M. (March–April 1997). "The Earthworm Inoculation Unit technique: an integrated system for cultivation and soil-inoculation of earthworms". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 29 (3–4): 251–7. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00053-3. Retrieved 19 June 2025.
  55. ^ Daniells, Ian G. (8 August 2012). "Hardsetting soils: a review". Soil Research. 50 (5): 349–59. doi:10.1071/SR11102. Retrieved 20 June 2025.
  56. ^ Mullins, Chris E. (1997). "Hardsetting". In Lal, Ratan; Blum, Winfried H.; Valentin, Christian; Stewart, Bobby Alton (eds.). Methods for assessment of soil degradation. Advances in soil science. Vol. 9. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-8493-7443-2. Retrieved 20 June 2025.
  57. ^ Pires, Luiz F.; Borges, Jaqueline A. R.; Rosa, Jadir A.; Cooper, Miguel; Heck, Richard J.; Passoni, Sabrina; Roque, Waldir L. (January 2017). "Soil structure changes induced by tillage systems". Soil and Tillage Research. 165: 66–79. doi:10.1016/j.still.2016.07.010. Retrieved 20 June 2025.
  58. ^ Voorhees, Ward B.; Senst, C. G.; Nelson, W. W. (March–April 1978). "Compaction and soil structure modification by wheel traffic in the northern Corn Belt". Soil Science Society of America Journal. 42 (2): 344–9. doi:10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200020029x. Retrieved 20 June 2025.
  59. ^ Mueller, Carsten W.; Baumert, Vera; Carminati, Andrea; Germon, Amandine; Holz, Maire; Kögel-Knabner, Ingrid; Peth, Stephan; Schlüter, Steffen; Uteau, Daniel; Vetterlein, Doris; Teixeira, Pedro; Vidal, Alix (June 2024). "From rhizosphere to detritusphere: soil structure formation driven by plant roots and the interactions with soil biota". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 193: 109396. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109396. Retrieved 20 June 2025.
  60. ^ Lee, Kenneth Ernest; Foster, R. C. (December 1991). "Soil fauna and soil structure". Australian Journal of Soil Research. 29 (6): 745–75. doi:10.1071/SR9910745. Retrieved 20 June 2025.
  61. ^ Rose, Calvin W. (January 1961). "Rainfall and soil structure". Soil Science. 91 (1): 49–54. Retrieved 20 June 2025.
  62. ^ Lyles, Leon; Tatarko, John (May–June 1986). "Wind erosion effects on soil texture and organic matter". Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 41 (3): 191–3. doi:10.1080/00224561.1986.12455968. Retrieved 20 June 2025.
  63. ^ Diel, Julius; Vogel, Hans-Jörg; Schlüter, Steffen (1 July 2019). "Impact of wetting and drying cycles on soil structure dynamics". Geoderma. 345: 63–71. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.018.
  64. ^ Logsdon, Sally; Berli, Markus; Horn, Rainer (January 2013). "Front Matter". Quantifying and Modeling Soil Structure Dynamics. Advances in Agricultural Systems Modeling. pp. vii–ix. doi:10.2134/advagricsystmodel3.frontmatter. ISBN 978-0-89118-957-2. ISSN 2163-2790.

Sources

[edit]

Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from the United States government

  • Australian Journal of Soil Research, 38(1) 61 – 70. Cited in: Land and Water Australia 2007, ways to improve soil structure and improve the productivity of irrigated agriculture, viewed May 2007, <https://web.archive.org/web/20070930071224/http://npsi.gov.au/>
  • Department of Land and Water Conservation 1991, "Field indicators of soil structure decline", viewed May 2007
  • Leeper, GW & Uren, NC 1993, 5th edn, Soil science, an introduction, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne
  • Marshall, TJ & Holmes JW, 1979, Soil Physics, Cambridge University Press
  • Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). "Examination and Description of Soils". Handbook 18. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original on 2011-05-14. Retrieved 2006-04-11.
  • Charman, PEV & Murphy, BW 1998, 5th edn, Soils, their properties and management, Oxford University Press, Melbourne
  • Firuziaan, M. and Estorff, O., (2002), "Simulation of the Dynamic Behavior of Bedding-Foundation-Soil in the Time Domain", Springer Verlag.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soil_structure&oldid=1296543556"