User talk:Galobtter: Difference between revisions
→Palestinian exodus RM closure: what was needed |
→Palestinian exodus RM closure: Might as well throw WP:TE in the bin, then. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
:@[[User:Nableezy|Nableezy]] I don't see anything substantive there to make me delay my re-close. I'll finish writing up the close and post it in the next few hours as I planned. [[User:Galobtter|Galobtter]] ([[User talk:Galobtter|pingó mió]]) 20:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC) |
:@[[User:Nableezy|Nableezy]] I don't see anything substantive there to make me delay my re-close. I'll finish writing up the close and post it in the next few hours as I planned. [[User:Galobtter|Galobtter]] ([[User talk:Galobtter|pingó mió]]) 20:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Good close. —[[User talk:Alalch E.|Alalch E.]] 23:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC) |
::Good close. —[[User talk:Alalch E.|Alalch E.]] 23:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
Horrible close. What you’ve basically done is given a green light to disruptive editors to keep gaming our processes until they get the result they want. The RM should really have been procedurally closed as incredibly disruptive seeing as the previous move review found no consensus to overturn; please reconsider it. '''[[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]]''' ([[User talk:Sceptre|talk]]) 00:46, 18 March 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:46, 18 March 2023
![]() |
Daily page views of User and User talk pages | ||||
User
User Talk
|
|
Discussion on the wording of 3RR
Hi. Can you offer your thoughts regarding the question I asked here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Russian invasion of Ukraine
Hello. I ask you to reconsider your close of Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022–present)#Requested move 26 February 2023, per the discussion at Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022–present)#Post-move discussion. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
User keeps adding copyrighted material even after being warned. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 09:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- @1AmNobody24 Handled, thanks. Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
CSS edit request
Would you mind removing the protection template from User:Galobtter/sandbox/Main page/styles.css? With it, the page is added to Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates. Thanks! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 22:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Eejit43 sure, done. Galobtter (pingó mió) 23:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright revert
Revert (00:04, 13 March 2023) of my edit of Stars and planetary systems in fiction. The text was based on wikipedia article Voyage to the End of the Universe. The earliest revision containing this text is dated 2010 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Voyage_to_the_End_of_the_Universe&oldid=344763823). --EdmundSquirrel (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @EdmundSquirrel, okay, I restored your edit. Note however, that when copying within Wikipedia you must attribute your edit, as described in WP:COPYWITHIN. Galobtter (pingó mió) 20:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Galobtter,
Just a head's up, we routinely delete user pages that are focused on alternative history scenarios like elections that never happened. I was about to delete this page when I saw you had untagged it. But, for some reason, we have quite a few editors who come and spend all of their time on their User pages providing details on elections that never occurred either in the past or into the future. Liz Read! Talk! 06:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Liz sure, feel free to delete it. I personally don't really feel like deleting people's sandboxes for this is helpful, but I suppose the criteria does apply. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Palestinian exodus RM closure
Hey, just a heads up; I'm asking for further explanation of Vanamonde93's MRV close on their talk page. I wouldn't want the streams to cross and make this already complicated RM even more complicated, so could you keep that in mind. :) Sceptre (talk) 13:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Galobtter, any idea of how long you're going to let the above inquiry to last before proceeding with a new close? Not trying to rush you, just looking for an idea of how long this might go on. nableezy - 19:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Nableezy I don't see anything substantive there to make me delay my re-close. I'll finish writing up the close and post it in the next few hours as I planned. Galobtter (pingó mió) 20:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Good close. —Alalch E. 23:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Horrible close. What you’ve basically done is given a green light to disruptive editors to keep gaming our processes until they get the result they want. The RM should really have been procedurally closed as incredibly disruptive seeing as the previous move review found no consensus to overturn; please reconsider it. Sceptre (talk) 00:46, 18 March 2023 (UTC)