User talk:Joyous!: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
m Reverted 1 edit by 50.144.176.114 (talk) to last revision by Untamed1910 |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why is it wrong to call Greta Thunberg an eco-warrior? |
|||
This dude loves hitler |
|||
{| align="center" style="border: 4px solid #000000; background-color: #fe8fb0;" cellpadding=20 |
{| align="center" style="border: 4px solid #000000; background-color: #fe8fb0;" cellpadding=20 |
Revision as of 21:28, 10 June 2025
Why is it wrong to call Greta Thunberg an eco-warrior?
Don't worry about making an article perfect. Just make it better. |
![]() | This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Talk Archives
IP range
Been having issues with this IP recently at Ricky Zoom, keeps reverting back to incorrect information. They've also recently been at 2600:1011:A03D:A0C4:8571:790D:E44D:742A, and I've also seen other IPs recently within the partially-blocked /21 range, including this IP entirely vandalizing The Masked Singer (American TV series) season 13. I obviously can't see all the edits from within the /21 range given how wide it is, but given some of the disruptivesness/vandalism going on from other IPs within the range, I'm thinking it might be wise to expand the /21's block, and/or find a more define range(s?) to limit these sort of problematic edits going on. Thanks in advance. Magitroopa (talk) 19:58, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've also just attempted reporting the /64 range at WP:AIV, but it seems to already think it is blocked, likely due to the current partial block on the /21 range. Likely needing assistance here... Magitroopa (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- I just blocked them for a couple of weeks. Joyous! Noise! 20:27, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 May 2025
- In the media: Feds aiming for WMF's nonprofit status
- Recent research: How readers use Wikipedia health content; Scholars generally happy with how their papers are cited on Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Sysop Tinucherian removed and admonished by the ArbCom
- Discussion report: Latest news from Centralized discussions
- Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man
- Disinformation report: At WikiCredCon, Wikipedia editors and Internet Archive discuss threats to trust in media
- News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan
- Comix: By territory
- Community view: A deep dive into Wikimedia
- Debriefing: Barkeep49's RfB debriefing
Hello world
I came across your message at User talk:Cedelmwood § Hello world and thought you might want to know that Zaidorien was also doing the same thing, in case that helps with understanding the pattern. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! Joyous! Noise! 22:31, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
Hi there, please join us at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenionyx8. I notice you have been dealing with some of the suspected puppets on the list, thank you. Audrey Woolf (talk) 11:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the alert. Wow. I don't have much to add to the (unexpectedly extensive) discussion, but I have it on my watchlist now. Joyous! Noise! 19:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Apologies if this should be obvious, but could you let me know where to find the SPI you created or (if you didn't use SPI) explain how you knew they were sockpuppets before you blocked the accounts? Audrey Woolf (talk) 20:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't create an SPI. The ones I blocked all made pretty decent edits (at least at first glance), but they buried the phrase "Hello world" in there among everything else, and they all had the "Todo" userpage. Joyous! Noise! 20:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Apologies if this should be obvious, but could you let me know where to find the SPI you created or (if you didn't use SPI) explain how you knew they were sockpuppets before you blocked the accounts? Audrey Woolf (talk) 20:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

Rusalkii
NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)
Interface administrator changes
- Following an RfC, administrator elections were permanently authorized on a five-month schedule. The next election will be scheduled soon; see Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections for more information. This is an alternate process to the RfA process and does not replace the latter.
- An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
- An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for your anti-vandalism efforts! Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 17:47, 7 May 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Joyous! Noise! 18:10, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Amde Seyon page
This has already become a topic of discussion with the editor who did the previous revision. The source is false, I replaced the body of text along with adding new information and a new image. I assume you left an automated message do to it having the same content but you are mistaken. 2601:280:CE82:7070:9827:A94C:9AF4:9CA7 (talk) 21:18, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
obvious socking
Could you block Jorottt, Lkjdsalkdalkdmlkamd, and Wintaffs as obvious socks of eachother in some order. Their only edits are to vandalize the same section at St Pius X College, Magherafelt all within a short period.[1][2][3] You already blocked Lkjdsalkdalkdmlkamd from the article[4] and protected it, but the protection has ran out and Jorottt has returned.[5] fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:43, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for noticing. Joyous! Noise! 21:48, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
RevDel
Hi, can you please handle deletion of this username? The global account doesn't exist, which suggests it's been suppressed, but it still shows up in the search bar, which can cause offense. TagUser (talk) 23:26, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Where are you still seeing the username? Joyous! Noise! 23:34, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- In the search bar; I was searching for a different user's contributions. TagUser (talk) 23:36, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think it's visible anymore. I just searched and couldn't find it. Joyous! Noise! 23:38, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. TagUser (talk) 23:40, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) I saw this above our discussion about an unrelated LTA - just wanted to give a heads-up that the username has not been suppressed, and I can still search for it; it also comes up as a suggestion when I type the first few letters of the name after "special:contribs/". Whenever I've seen a suppressed username in the past, it's greyed out, but this one still shows up as red when I open up the contribs page. Patient Zerotalk 02:15, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. TagUser (talk) 23:40, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think it's visible anymore. I just searched and couldn't find it. Joyous! Noise! 23:38, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- In the search bar; I was searching for a different user's contributions. TagUser (talk) 23:36, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Mb
Sorry I got confused and put in the wrong word that was mb. JamesMcCloy11 (talk) 19:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Edits
Please stop deleting my edits. JamesMcCloy11 (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2025
- In the media: Wikimedia Foundation sues over UK government decision that might require identity verification of editors worldwide
- Disinformation report: What does Jay-Z know about Wikipedia?
- Technology report: WMF introduces unique but privacy-preserving browser cookie
- Debriefing: Goldsztajn's RfA debriefing
- Obituary: Max Lum (User:ICOHBuzz)
- Community view: A Deep Dive Into Wikimedia (part 2)
- Comix: Collection
- From the archives: Humor from the Archives
New message from JamesEMonroe

Message added 01:36, 17 May 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:128.92.54.72#top( idk why it broke im sorry) JamesEMonroe (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Children's comedy IP
I think this might be one of two LTAs (which I've only realised since I left warnings on their talk page! *trout*). Either Bambifan101 or Caidin-Johnson, both have fixations on editing children's TV shows in nonsensical ways. Patient Zerotalk 01:42, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. I'll be happy to block if they make another edit. Let me know if I miss something. Joyous! Noise! 01:44, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Will do. Patient Zerotalk 01:45, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Pranavdevp.m dubbing artist
Pranavdevp.m dubbing artist
promotional material for Pranavdevp.m, a dubbing artist, highlighting their work with Colors, a television channel owned by Viacom 18. The image showcases Pranavdevp.m in a recording studio, emphasizing their profession as a dubbing artist.

Pranavdevpmdubbingartistplay (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Did you have a question? Joyous! Noise! 13:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Yunus (Surah)
Hello, you replied to my edit a while ago. Thank you for informing me that. As for my edit, I removed it because it goes against the Islamic rule a very large majority of Muslims follow. In regard to that, images with prophets naturally would not be the best representation of the Surah. Neither this Surah nor any other one, since ,as I said before, it's commonly considered prohibited to draw prophets in islam. I'd like for you to take the point into consideration as well. Samaa deya (talk) 02:34, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I understand your point, but Wikipedia has an established policy to deal with that issue. I hope you noticed that there is an option to suppress images that you'd prefer not to see. Joyous! Noise! 02:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Am I allowed to say
...I love you lol. I was just thinking about page protection because of BLP issues. Ta very muchly. Knitsey (talk) 20:39, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I had time to go upstairs and take a shower and they were STILL at it. Joyous! Noise! 20:41, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I think I'm too tired to deal with more of them tonight. I'm in read mode. Knitsey (talk) 20:45, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Read something good. Enjoy your evening. Joyous! Noise! 20:50, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I think I'm too tired to deal with more of them tonight. I'm in read mode. Knitsey (talk) 20:45, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
You are always on the recent changes page monitoring for Vandalism Destinyokhiria (talk) 02:27, 21 May 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you! RC is my zen activity. Joyous! Noise! 02:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Do you think this article belongs on Wikipedia? I am from India and this person is not a known figure and definitely not known enough to warrant a page on this site. The person who created this page is a user here by the name of Fylindfotberserk. Nagendra Kumar is his great grandfather. Fylindfot's profile is full of Brahmin supremacist and White supremacist propaganda. Does Wikipedia endorse such types of people? 2409:4089:8594:6491:B07F:921F:6278:2A8B (talk) 03:15, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello. Thank you for checking back with me. Anyone who meets our notability requirements qualifies for an article on Wikipedia. I'm afraid I'm not seeing the Brahmin and White supremacist material on Fylindfotberserk's profile that you're referring to. Could you be more specific? He also did not create the article. It was created 10 years ago by Uschi8265. Joyous! Noise! 03:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- That's one of his alts. He proudly flaunts his Brahmin status here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Brahmin_Wikipedians
- Why does such a tag even exist? His name is Fylfot (German swastik) +ind (india)+berserk (viking) and his profile is filled with genetic stuff usually proclaiming Brahmins as Europeans or having high R1a and being lighter skinned 2409:4089:8594:6491:B07F:921F:6278:2A8B (talk) 03:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- If you have concerns about Fylindfotberserk, his username, his profile page, or his edits, your conversation needs to be with him. And it does need to be a conversation, not the addition of unsourced statements like those you've been adding to Nagendra Kumar Bhattacharyya. Joyous! Noise! 04:08, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- You are an Admin and you reverted my edits that's why I brought it up to you. He's a hardcore racist and casteist. Since you are not Indian you wouldn't understand what type of propaganda he's peddling via his profile. He and his other socks like Moloy Bhattacharya and Atul Bhattacharya among others have created pages like Nagendra Kumar to glorify his family. Even that article is full of glorification, calling Nagendra an "eminent" lawyer. You can check those accounts. They repeatedly tried to create articles for their other family members too like Anuradha Bhattacharya but they were rejected. 2409:4089:8594:6491:B07F:921F:6278:2A8B (talk) 04:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- I reverted your edits because you were using adding irrelevant and unsourced infomation, instead of trying to actually improve the encyclopedia. Anyone can do that, admin or not. I repeat: if you are having concerns about another editor, the first step is to speak with that editor. Joyous! Noise! 04:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- I already did. It's not like its gonna affect him. 2409:4089:8594:6491:B07F:921F:6278:2A8B (talk) 05:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Can I at least remove "eminent" from the article of Nagendra Kumar Bhattacharya?because that is obvious glorification. 2409:4089:8594:6491:B07F:921F:6278:2A8B (talk) 05:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have no problem with that. Joyous! Noise! 05:52, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Joyous!: This IP is nothing but a sock of banned User:Karkanistan (among others), known for edit warring, WP:CIR, disruptions and obvious sock puppetry. Apparently, they aren't happy with me starting the SPI, hence trying to troll since 2020. First time I came across this specific article was in June 2024 while reverting their vandalism (See this and the deleted revisions) which was filled with slurs, coarse slangs and racist tirade against me, the Brahmins and Bengalis in the text and edit summaries. This person has this habit of spamming admin t/ps in hopes of banning me. I was even tagged by this IP that time. Pinging @Malcolmxl5: who banned the last ID sock of this person and has created a list of abusive sock IPs, as well as @Glen:, the first admin who took action against this troll; also pinging @Bbb23 and PhilKnight:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up. I had a feeling I'd stepped in something ongoing. Joyous! Noise! 14:49, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Joyous!: This IP is nothing but a sock of banned User:Karkanistan (among others), known for edit warring, WP:CIR, disruptions and obvious sock puppetry. Apparently, they aren't happy with me starting the SPI, hence trying to troll since 2020. First time I came across this specific article was in June 2024 while reverting their vandalism (See this and the deleted revisions) which was filled with slurs, coarse slangs and racist tirade against me, the Brahmins and Bengalis in the text and edit summaries. This person has this habit of spamming admin t/ps in hopes of banning me. I was even tagged by this IP that time. Pinging @Malcolmxl5: who banned the last ID sock of this person and has created a list of abusive sock IPs, as well as @Glen:, the first admin who took action against this troll; also pinging @Bbb23 and PhilKnight:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have no problem with that. Joyous! Noise! 05:52, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- I reverted your edits because you were using adding irrelevant and unsourced infomation, instead of trying to actually improve the encyclopedia. Anyone can do that, admin or not. I repeat: if you are having concerns about another editor, the first step is to speak with that editor. Joyous! Noise! 04:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- You are an Admin and you reverted my edits that's why I brought it up to you. He's a hardcore racist and casteist. Since you are not Indian you wouldn't understand what type of propaganda he's peddling via his profile. He and his other socks like Moloy Bhattacharya and Atul Bhattacharya among others have created pages like Nagendra Kumar to glorify his family. Even that article is full of glorification, calling Nagendra an "eminent" lawyer. You can check those accounts. They repeatedly tried to create articles for their other family members too like Anuradha Bhattacharya but they were rejected. 2409:4089:8594:6491:B07F:921F:6278:2A8B (talk) 04:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- If you have concerns about Fylindfotberserk, his username, his profile page, or his edits, your conversation needs to be with him. And it does need to be a conversation, not the addition of unsourced statements like those you've been adding to Nagendra Kumar Bhattacharyya. Joyous! Noise! 04:08, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Article for Rocket Companies
Hi Joyous!, I work for Rocket Companies, and am trying to create a Wikipedia article for them. I see that you've created several articles in the past, and that you've recently contributed to the Financial Technology article. Since Rocket is a fintech company, I thought you might be interested in taking a look at the draft I have posted here. Would you consider moving it to main space?
Thank you, Annie13478 (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello! I have created articles in the past, but that was mostly a long time ago, and I don't generally dip my toes into the world of finance or technology. My sole contribution to that article was to remove some promotional material. I don't know that I'd be the best judge of that article. Actually, I know perfectly well that I wouldn't be. Your best bet may be to go through the "regular" review process by adding
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of your draft, which will signal that it is ready to be reviewed. Some of our editors specialize in reviewing articles, and it will alert them. There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, so it may take some time. Joyous! Noise! 17:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Revoke TPA for 65.128.231.222
Would you be able to revoke TPA for 65.128.231.222 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)? Thanks. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 02:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Probably also pull anonymous only as well. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 02:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Got it. Thanks! Joyous! Noise! 02:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).
- An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.
- A new feature called Multiblocks will be deployed on English Wikipedia on the week of June 2. See the relevant announcement on the administrators' noticeboard.
- History merges performed using the mergehistory special page are now logged at both the source and destination, rather than just the source as previously, after this RFC and the resolution of T118132.
- An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 17 June 2025. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
- An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in June 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
wikipedia
hey joyous how long does it take for wikipedia to accept my article and make it public Astrawiki3203 (talk) 20:49, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- It can take a while. There's quite a backlog. While you wait, why not try out some newcomer tasks to keep you occupied? I'd hate for you to be bored. Joyous! Noise! 22:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- The article you're asking about...is it the one on your userpage? About the Decker sisters? Joyous! Noise! 03:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- If you want your article to be reviewed, you can go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Submitting and follow the instructions there. It can be best to move it to Draft:Decker sisters case or something like that when submitting it for review. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- yes Astrawiki3203 (talk) 18:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Before you submit it, it will HAVE to have published, reliable sources, so anyone reading the article can verify the information that's in it. Track down the news stories in the big well-known newspapers and use those to cite your sources as footnotes. Don't use blogs. The article will be declined without sourcing. Joyous! Noise! 20:58, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
88.156.215.58
Hey @Joyous!, twice in one day! May I suggest revoking TPA too for 88.156.215.58? Thanks -OXYLYPSE (talk) 21:32, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Done. I had a feeling I'd be revisiting that page. Joyous! Noise! 21:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
TPA
You should probably revoke TPA here. I'm sure we all know how it will go otherwise. 🪷 nahida 00:45, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- That was...colorful. Thanks. Joyous! Noise! 00:48, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- Not every day you get to see something like that, lol. You're welcome. 🪷 nahida 00:49, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
isnotreal
is not real is simply not real cope 217.239.147.66 (talk) 20:35, 10 June 2025 (UTC)