Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Roman Republic/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
might as well close it Tag: Reverted |
Undid revision 1294930642 by TenPoundHammer (talk) undo so it can be properly closed |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate discussion-archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-progressive-subtle, #f5f3ef); color: var(--color-base, inherit); overflow:auto; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-subtle, #aaa)"> |
|||
<div class="boilerplate-header"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <span style="color:var(--color-error, red)">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' <!-- from Template:discussion top--> |
|||
</div> '''Procedural close''', article is not a GA at present. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 17:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Roman Republic/1|Roman Republic]]=== |
===[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Roman Republic/1|Roman Republic]]=== |
||
| Line 12: | Line 7: | ||
:Hi [[User talk:GoldRingChip|GoldRingChip]], GAR is for articles that are currently GAs that maybe should not be. If you think this article ''should'' be a GA, you'd want [[WP:GAN]]. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 03:58, 10 June 2025 (UTC) |
:Hi [[User talk:GoldRingChip|GoldRingChip]], GAR is for articles that are currently GAs that maybe should not be. If you think this article ''should'' be a GA, you'd want [[WP:GAN]]. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 03:58, 10 June 2025 (UTC) |
||
:: Oh, I see. Well, never mind. I would fail the [[Template: Uw-ga-driveby| Uw-ga-driveby]] test. I'm only ranked 10th and my contributions (by character count) were relatively small. {{Ping|Ifly6|Haploidavey|T8612|RomanHistorian|Nikkimaria|PericlesofAthens}} Maybe one of the other prominent editors could re-nominate it? —[[User talk:GoldRingChip|GoldRingChip]] 15:06, 10 June 2025 (UTC) |
:: Oh, I see. Well, never mind. I would fail the [[Template: Uw-ga-driveby| Uw-ga-driveby]] test. I'm only ranked 10th and my contributions (by character count) were relatively small. {{Ping|Ifly6|Haploidavey|T8612|RomanHistorian|Nikkimaria|PericlesofAthens}} Maybe one of the other prominent editors could re-nominate it? —[[User talk:GoldRingChip|GoldRingChip]] 15:06, 10 June 2025 (UTC) |
||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: var(--color-error, red);">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] --> |
|||
</div><div style="clear:both;" class=></div> |
|||
Revision as of 01:00, 11 June 2025
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
It was last delisted seven years ago and has had extensive improvement since then. Problems at the time included Citations needed, which are all since gone. In fact, the cites are extensive now. Let's have another look, eh? —GoldRingChip 21:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi GoldRingChip, GAR is for articles that are currently GAs that maybe should not be. If you think this article should be a GA, you'd want WP:GAN. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:58, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. Well, never mind. I would fail the Uw-ga-driveby test. I'm only ranked 10th and my contributions (by character count) were relatively small. @Ifly6, Haploidavey, T8612, RomanHistorian, Nikkimaria, and PericlesofAthens: Maybe one of the other prominent editors could re-nominate it? —GoldRingChip 15:06, 10 June 2025 (UTC)