Jump to content

Draft:Christianity in the Sasanian Empire: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Submitting using AfC-submit-wizard
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Brief history of Christianity in the Sasanian Empire (Iraq and Iran modern territory)}}
{{Draft topics|philosophy-and-religion|west-asia|history}}
{{AfC topic|other}}
{{AfC submission|||ts=20250624184214|u=Kseni-kam|ns=118}}
{{AFC submission|d|reason|Unreadable walls of text. Unreviewable. Please treat yourself to some paragraph breaks
{{AFC submission|d|reason|Unreadable walls of text. Unreviewable. Please treat yourself to some paragraph breaks


Line 6: Line 10:


----
----

{{Short description|Brief history of Christianity in the Sasanian Empire (Iraq and Iran modern territory)}}


Christianity in the [[Sasanian Empire]] was the religion of a [[Religious minority|Christian minority]] in the state of the Sasanians, which existed in the territories of modern-day [[Iraq]] and [[Iran]] from 224 to 651 CE. There is no reliable information about the initial spread of Christianity beyond the eastern border of the [[Roman Empire]]. Before 224 CE, the dominant state in the region was the [[Parthian Empire]], which was succeeded by the Sasanian Empire. Under the early Sasanians, during the reign of Shahanshah [[Bahram II]] and the active efforts of the priest [[Kartir]], [[Zoroastrianism]] became the state religion for the first time in Iranian history. During this period, the first persecutions of Christians occurred, and the [[Manichaeism|Manichaean]] prophet [[Mani (prophet)|Mani]] was executed. During the [[Roman–Persian Wars|military campaigns]] (from the 3rd to the 6th centuries), Iranian rulers [[Shapur I]], [[Shapur II]], and [[Khosrow I]] resettled a large number of Christians from the Roman Empire to [[Khuzestan]] and the region around [[Ctesiphon]]. As a result, [[Non-Chalcedonian Christianity|anti-Chalcedonian Christianity]] began to [[Christianity in Iran|spread in Iran]].
Christianity in the [[Sasanian Empire]] was the religion of a [[Religious minority|Christian minority]] in the state of the Sasanians, which existed in the territories of modern-day [[Iraq]] and [[Iran]] from 224 to 651 CE. There is no reliable information about the initial spread of Christianity beyond the eastern border of the [[Roman Empire]]. Before 224 CE, the dominant state in the region was the [[Parthian Empire]], which was succeeded by the Sasanian Empire. Under the early Sasanians, during the reign of Shahanshah [[Bahram II]] and the active efforts of the priest [[Kartir]], [[Zoroastrianism]] became the state religion for the first time in Iranian history. During this period, the first persecutions of Christians occurred, and the [[Manichaeism|Manichaean]] prophet [[Mani (prophet)|Mani]] was executed. During the [[Roman–Persian Wars|military campaigns]] (from the 3rd to the 6th centuries), Iranian rulers [[Shapur I]], [[Shapur II]], and [[Khosrow I]] resettled a large number of Christians from the Roman Empire to [[Khuzestan]] and the region around [[Ctesiphon]]. As a result, [[Non-Chalcedonian Christianity|anti-Chalcedonian Christianity]] began to [[Christianity in Iran|spread in Iran]].

Latest revision as of 18:42, 24 June 2025


Christianity in the Sasanian Empire was the religion of a Christian minority in the state of the Sasanians, which existed in the territories of modern-day Iraq and Iran from 224 to 651 CE. There is no reliable information about the initial spread of Christianity beyond the eastern border of the Roman Empire. Before 224 CE, the dominant state in the region was the Parthian Empire, which was succeeded by the Sasanian Empire. Under the early Sasanians, during the reign of Shahanshah Bahram II and the active efforts of the priest Kartir, Zoroastrianism became the state religion for the first time in Iranian history. During this period, the first persecutions of Christians occurred, and the Manichaean prophet Mani was executed. During the military campaigns (from the 3rd to the 6th centuries), Iranian rulers Shapur I, Shapur II, and Khosrow I resettled a large number of Christians from the Roman Empire to Khuzestan and the region around Ctesiphon. As a result, anti-Chalcedonian Christianity began to spread in Iran.

The position of Christians in Persia significantly worsened following the conversion of Emperor Constantine the Great to Christianity. There were suspicions about Shahanshah Shapur II and that his Christian subjects might sympathize with their co-religionists in the West, leading to severe persecution of the church. Significant persecutions also took place at the end of the reign of Yazdegerd I and the beginning of the reign of Bahram V around 420 CE, as well as under Yazdegerd II in 446–448 CE. Nevertheless, Christianity spread throughout the entire territory of the Sasanian Empire, with bishops present in all major cities. The most significant organization of Christian communities was the Church of the East. According to Eastern church tradition, an independent church hierarchy developed during the 4th century and achieved full hierarchical identity with the establishment of an officially recognized Christian church in the Sasanian Empire under Shah Yazdegerd I in 410 CE.

By the early 7th century, the Sasanian Empire was the largest Christian state by population. The majority of Persian Christians belonged to churches that did not accept the decisions of the Council of Chalcedon in 451 CE — namely, the Nestorian Church of the East and the Monophysite Syriac Jacobite Church. The only region predominantly inhabited by Chalcedonians was Iberia. Under Khosrow II, the majority of the population consisted of Christians belonging to the Nestorian Church of the East and the Monophysite churches of Syria and Armenia.

There is a wide range of opinions regarding the extent to which different religions in the Sasanian Empire coexisted harmoniously. The prevailing view today is that persecutions of Christians were more the exception than the rule and that they occurred for political reasons, both external and internal.

Religions in Post-Avestan Iran

[edit]

In the Parthian Period

[edit]
Parthia and adjacent territories

The era in the Iranian history between the Avestan and Sasanian periods, when from the late 4th century BCE to the early 3rd century CE was characterized by religious diversity. During this time, Iran was under the rule of the Parthian Arsacid dynasty. The traditional Zoroastrian tradition began to fade, giving way to the worship of various spirit-daevas. During this time, Jewish and Christian communities also emerged in Iran. Ruled by a junior branch of the Arsacids, Armenia by 190 BCE was a conglomerate of 120 principalities governed by nakharars, some of which adhered to Persian cults, while others followed Hellenistic practices.[1] According to James R. Russell, the subsequent Artaxiad dynasty (189 BCE – 12 CE) supported Zoroastrianism.[2] Generally, the prevailing view is that the state adhered to principles of religious tolerance or was indifferent to dogmatic issues during the Arsacid period.[3]

The moment of the Christians in Mesopotamia appearance is unknown and remains a subject of debate.[4] French archaeologist Jean Maurice Fiey (1967) dates the event to the late 1st century, while American historian W. S. McCullough (1982) suggests it occurred a century later.[5] According to the renowned Syriac researcher Sebastian Brock, Christian communities, isolated from the church of the Roman Empire, could have existed in Mesopotamia from the 2nd century.[6] The desire to attribute antiquity to their church led, for example, to the late 8th-century Nestorian patriarch Timothy I claiming that "Christianity among us was founded approximately 500 before Nestorius and twenty years after the ascension of our Savior".[7] Most likely, Christianity reached Persian territory via trade routes from Edessa, appearing first in Nisibis, Arbil, and Veh-Ardashir.[8]

The spread of Christianity from Edessa further east is mentioned in the Acts of Mar Mari, dated tentatively to the early 7th century.[9] The task of the authors of the Acts, living in the 6th to early 7th centuries, was to substantiate the antiquity of the Church of the East in the territory of modern Iraq and the authority of its catholicoses, whose residence was in the Sasanian capital Veh-Ardashir, also known as Kokhe and Seleucia-Ctesiphon. According to the Acts, from Edessa, Mari traveled toward Nisibis, then through Adiabene south to Babylonia. Upon reaching Kokhe, he founded the first church there. After converting Babylonia to Christianity, Mari proceeded to Persia, starting with Beth-Huzaye and Elam in southwestern modern Iran. The Acts claim that through countless miracles, Mari established a widespread church hierarchy in Persia, with numerous priests, deacons, schools, teachers, and hospitals. Most likely, the Christian centers described in this apocryphal text were established closer to the time of the document's composition than to apostolic times.[10]

Another source, the 6th-century Syriac Chronicle of Arbela, names Mar Pkidha as the first bishop of Adiabene. According to the chronicle, by the time of the fall of the Parthian Empire, there were 20 Christian bishops in Mesopotamia.[11] Church tradition links the emergence of Christian communities in the East with the activities of the apostles Peter, considered the first patriarch of the Eastern church, and Thomas, as well as the apostle of the Seventy Thaddeus (Addai) and his disciple, the apostle of Mesopotamia Mari, through whose efforts the church became known as the "church of Mar Mari".[12] An idealized version of the history of Christianity's emergence in the capital of Osroene, Edessa, is presented in the Doctrine of Addai, dated to the first half of the 5th century.[13] The correspondence between King Abgar and Jesus Christ cited there has led some researchers to consider Osroene the first country to adopt Christianity.[12] There are also grounds to suggest Antioch or Palestine as sources of Christianity in Edessa.[14] In modern historiography, the earliest Christian communities in Parthia are identified among Jews who had lived there since the Babylonian captivity. According to one hypothesis, Christianity spread eastward with trade caravans, with Jews controlling the routes through the Persian Gulf to Central Asia and China.[15][16][17]

Although information about beliefs in early Christian Osroene is limited, sources suggest the presence in Edessa of various religious groups, including Jews, adherents of traditional forms of Greco-Roman and Aramaic polytheism, and Manichaeism. Religious diversity in Edessa was facilitated by its geographic location at the border of the major empires of the ancient world and at the crossroads of trade routes. German historian Walter Bauer describes Christianity in Edessa as "heretical" and consistently distant from orthodoxy.[18] Zoroastrian Parthians showed no hostility toward the Christian and Jewish minorities, in contrast to the Roman Empire, where Christians faced systematic persecution.[19] Due to the absence or minimal presence of persecution, the cult of martyrdom spread in the East only in the 4th century.[20]

Under the Early Sasanians

[edit]
Kartir's inscription at Naqsh-e Rajab

In 224 CE, Ardashir I (224–241), the founder of the Sasanian dynasty, came to power in Iran. According to available information, his family had close ties with the Zoroastrian clergy.[21] The 6th-century pseudepigraph Letter of Tansar justifies the legitimacy of the dynasty's rise to power through its religious zeal, positioning Ardashir as the true heir of the ancient Achaemenids.[Notes 1] The anonymous author criticizes the apostate Arsacids and their policy of religious tolerance.[22] Under the early Sasanians, the clergy (mobeds), led by the magupat (chief of the magi) or, later, the mobedan-mobed, assumed a prominent position in society.[23] During the reign of Shahanshah Bahram II (276–293) and the active efforts of the Zoroastrian priest Kartir, Zoroastrianism became the state religion for the first time in Iranian history.[24] Kartir's inscriptions and his threats against non-believers are the subject of numerous studies attempting to determine the extent of religious intolerance among Zoroastrian mobeds. Despite the threatening rhetoric, there is no confirmation in Christian, Jewish, or Mandaean sources that persecutions took place. The only exception is Manichaeism, whose prophet Mani was executed under Kartir.[25][26] According to British Iranologist Mary Boyce, the Sasanian period alternated between phases of religious tolerance and intolerance, with Kartir's activities falling into the latter category.[27] Soviet Orientalist Elena Doroshchenko considers intolerance a defining feature of Sasanian Zoroastrianism.[23] Several later researchers have criticized this binary opposition as oversimplified. They have found evidence in late Sasanian texts of more nuanced interactions between state Zoroastrianism and religious minorities in the early period.[28] It has also been suggested that relations between the state and mobeds were significantly more antagonistic than depicted in Zoroastrian sources.[29][30]

The oldest Christian ruins in Iran are located on the island of Kharg[31]

Traditional historiography describes the relationship between Zoroastrianism and other religions in the Sasanian Empire using terms such as "state religion," "church," and "persecution." This view considers secular authorities' interference in citizens' spiritual lives as a form of persecution. However, Professor Adam Becker of New York University argues that this terminology is an anachronistic legacy of the liberal ideas of the European Enlightenment, employed due to a lack of better analogies.[32] In the Middle Persian language, all non-Zoroastrian religions were designated by the term agdēn ("infidels," see also agdēnīh – "bad religion"),[33] considered synonymous with the term anēr, Aneran, non-Iran.[34] In this ethnolinguistic concept, Christians also identified themselves as part of Aneran, which was preferable in legal terms to being considered apostate Zoroastrians. Jews and Manichaeans held the same position.[35] Sources for studying Sasanian law include various collections of precedents, such as the Madigan-i Hazar Datistan.

Christian hagiographic literature can also serve as an additional source, though the accuracy of the legal procedures described therein is questionable. After Zoroastrianism was established as the state religion, the legal system became Zoroastrian in character and restricted the rights of religious minorities. Although Zoroastrian law applied to all subjects of the shah, a personal principle was also in effect, whereby each individual was subject to the law corresponding to their status.[36] In trials against Christians, the prosecution was represented by mobeds.[37] In Sasanian culture, the purpose of punishment was to save the offender's soul from the consequences of their crime. The first, but not the only, condition for saving the sinner's soul from posthumous retribution was an honest and complete confession of sins.[38] In the case of Christians, the state and religion were considered the injured parties in judicial proceedings, and the process was inquisitorial. The aim of measures applied to the accused, including arrest and torture, was to convince the heretic of the error of their beliefs and the truth of Zoroastrianism. Being born Christian was not considered apostasy.[39] Christians were not prohibited from serving in the Sasanian army, where they could hold high positions.[40] Nevertheless, sources indicate that the loyalty of Christians to the shah persisted until the 7th century.[41]

It is difficult to estimate how many Christians were brought to Persia as a result of several large-scale deportations of residents of the Eastern Roman Empire in the 4th and 5th centuries. Given the religious policies of Emperor Valerian, it is unlikely that many Christians were among the soldiers captured by Shapur I (241–272) in 260 CE. According to the Chronicle of Seert, compiled between the 9th and 11th centuries and considered unreliable, Shapur deported many Christians from Antioch to Persia.[24][42] These measures should not be regarded as anti-Christian but rather as part of strategic initiatives.[43] The Chronicle of Seert indicates that the captives formed an organized community with their own leaders, one of whom was the first bishop of Gondishapur, Demetrius of Antioch. The same source reports that the Christians were divided into two groups, Greek and Syrian, each with its own bishop. It is likely that the Iranians regarded them as representatives of different forms of Christianity. According to French religious scholar Jean de Menasce, the Christians in this context were Gnostic-Marcionites.[44] While Valerian I persecuted Christians, Shapur I, on the contrary, treated them favorably.[45] Later sources, including the Armenian Ełišē and the Syriac John of Ephesus, report an "edict of religious tolerance" under Shapur I.[46]

By the mid-3rd century, the number of Christians in the country had become significant enough to be perceived as a threat. Indirect evidence of this can be found in the presence of quotations from the New Testament in Manichaean texts, as well as mentions of "Nazarenes" and "Christians"[Notes 2][47] in one of Kartir's inscriptions.[48][49] The first persecutions of Christians occurred during the reign of Bahram I (273–276) or Bahram II (276–293), as documented in the 4th- or 5th-century account of the martyrdom of Candida.[Notes 3] Likely from a family of captured soldiers of Valerian, Candida refused to become one of Bahram's wives, for which she was tortured and executed.[50] The 5th-century Armenian "Martyrdom of the Voskyans" recounts possibly earlier events but is replete with anachronisms.[51]

Persecution of Christians

[edit]
Border regions of the Roman Empire and Iran

The Sasanian rulers' relations with religious minorities depended on a combination of external and internal political factors. These factors included the shahanshah's personal preferences, the state of relations with the Roman Empire, and the shahanshah's relationship with the Zoroastrian clergy. Each period of persecution had its own characteristics and underlying causes.[52] Over time, the relationship between the Christian clergy and the state became more significant.[53] In the early 4th century, during the reign of Shah Hormizd II, the king of Armenia Tiridates III,[Notes 4] under the influence of Gregory the Illuminator, adopted Christianity. The adoption of Christianity divided the Armenian nobility, as a significant portion of the nakharars remained loyal to the ancient religion. The prevailing view in Armenian historiography that the adoption of Christianity marked a break with ancient paganism and barbarism and a choice in favor of cultural development is contested in modern Western historiography.[54] In the Roman Empire, after his victory over Licinius in 324 CE, Emperor Constantine the Great made a definitive choice to support Christianity.[55]

Church historian Eusebius of Caesarea reports that Constantine considered it his duty to convert pagans in neighboring countries to the true faith. He was also concerned about the fate of his co-religionists in Persia, who were under the rule of a Zoroastrian monarch.[56] In his Life of Constantine, Eusebius cites a letter from the emperor to Shahanshah Shapur II (309–379), in which Constantine entrusted the lives and well-being of Christians to the Persian ruler.[57][58] Historian Timothy David Barnes dates the letter to late 324 CE.[59] If it is an authentic testament to Roman-Persian relations, it is believed to have shaped the fate of Persian Christians in the centuries that followed.[60] In any case, Eusebius's works were translated into Syriac during the author's lifetime and were widely known in Persia.[61]

The shift in religious policy in the Roman Empire, as well as Constantine's interference in the affairs of Armenia late in his life, cast doubt on the loyalty of Persian Christians.[45] The dichotomy of loyalties was noted by the fifth-century Armenian theologian Yeznik of Kolb, who believed that everyone was either a servant of the King of Kings or the Roman emperor.[40] According to modern historians, Shapur's concerns were justified, as in 337 CE, Constantine was prepared to launch a war against Persia to liberate Christians.[62] It is also possible that the formation of the Zoroastrian clergy's structure and the codification of Zoroastrian "orthodoxy" were reactions to the changing religious policy in the West.[63] On the other hand, in 324 CE, the possibility of war was not yet apparent, and it was only the power struggle following the death of Armenian King Tiridates III in 330 CE that made war inevitable.[64] Constantine's death in May of 337 CE did not halt preparations for war, which began that year or the next.[65] Iranian historian Touraj Daryaee adds to the list of reasons for the persecution of Christians the universal nature of the Western religion and its proselytism.[66]

The most important sources for the persecution of Christians under Shapur II are the works of the Syriac writer Aphrahat (d. 345) and the hagiography of Bishop Shimun I Bar Sabbae.[67] In the late 440s, Sozomen recorded his version of events.[68] According to him, the persecutions were instigated by the shah's wife, who was influenced by Jews.[69] The overall outcome of these events is well known, though the exact sequence and chronology remain subjects of scholarly debate, including the date of Shimun's martyrdom.[70] Additional complications arise from interpreting dates provided in sources according to the Seleucid calendar.[71] After an unsuccessful siege of Nisibis, Shapur II issued a firman imposing additional taxes on Christians to finance the war with Rome. The 5th-century Armenian historian Faustus of Byzantium explicitly states that the tax was intended to compel Christians to renounce their faith. Shapur then ordered the killing of all priests, the destruction of churches, and the confiscation of church property. Shimun refused to cooperate with the tax collection and was arrested as a traitor to the Persian state and an apostate from Zoroastrianism. A total of 128 individuals were killed. Scholars estimate Shimun's death occurred in 339, 340, 341, or 344 CE.[72] Scholars date Shimun's death to 339, 340, 341, or 344 CE.[73] The following year, a new decree initiated the execution of all Christians, though these did not last long.[74][75][76] Although the total number of victims was significant—estimated by Sozomen at 16000 individuals—the persecution had no impact on the spread of Christianity in the country.[77]

Basilica of Bolnisi Sioni, second half of the 5th century[78]

The persecution under Shapur II marked a turning point in relations between Christian and Jewish communities. German Orientalist Gernot Wießner [de] demonstrated that the account of Shimun's martyrdom exists in two versions, one of which blames the Jews for initiating the persecutions through slander against Christians. The contrast, not evident in Aphrahat's earlier works but clear in later ones, is explained by Adam Becker from New York University as resulting from Judaized Christians seeking refuge in synagogues during times of danger, necessitating a response to a religious distinction that was previously inconsequential.[79] Subsequently, Shapur II continued efforts to dismantle the church hierarchy and killed several bishops, including the catholicoses Shahdost (342) and Barba'shmin (346). After this, the title of catholicos remained vacant for nearly 20 years (346–363). In 363 CE, under the terms of a peace treaty, Nisibis was ceded to the Persians, prompting the renowned theologian Ephrem the Syrian and several teachers to leave the Nisibis School and relocate to Edessa, which was under Roman control.[80] There, through his efforts, the Edessa School, founded in the time of the legendary Addai, was revived.[81] The persecutions initiated by Shapur II were halted under his grandson Yazdegerd I (399–420). Christian sources preserve enthusiastic accounts of Yazdegerd as a "second Constantine", and the consequences for Persian Christians of the council held in Seleucia-Ctesiphon in 410 CE are considered comparable in significance to the Edict of Milan.[82][83] After 410 CE, churches and monasteries began to appear in the country, becoming centers for the veneration of martyrs.[84]

Following the partition of Greater Armenia between Byzantium and Persia in 387 CE, its larger eastern portion became part of Iran.[85] Because of Armenia's strategic importance in the Sasanian Empire, Christians were significantly persecuted during major military campaigns in the Caucasus. It is unclear whether these persecutions were driven solely by military-strategic considerations or if the Sasanians hoped to return Armenians to the "true faith".[86] Persecutions under Yazdegerd II (438–457) led to the Vardanants War in 450–451 CE. The events of that period, or those of the later Vahan War of 482–484 CE, are associated with the Martyrdom of the Atomyans and the Martyrdom of the Holy Queen Shushanik.[87][88] As noted by J. Russell, the nakharars Atom Gnuni and Manahir Rshtuni were executed not for their beliefs but for spreading Christianity in Ctesiphon.[89] Scott McDonough, a historian from William Paterson University, points out that the ongoing Christianization of Armenia's military aristocracy posed a substantial threat to the Sasanian monarchy. The aristocracy's cavalry made a significant contribution to the Sasanian army, and the monarchy assumed a direct link between the worship of Ahura Mazda and Iran's victories.[90] The Armenian Apostolic Church played a significant role in the liberation struggle.[85] The armed struggle of 482–484 CE led to the cessation of religious persecutions of Armenians by the Persians and the proclamation of freedom of religion in Persian Armenia.[85]

Church Structures

[edit]

Internal Organization of the Church Before 410 CE

[edit]

Little information has been preserved about the ecclesiastical organization in Persia before the mid-4th century. It is likely that some episcopal structure existed in the East as early as the reign of Shapur I, but no details are known. Dioceses were disconnected, and boundaries between them were not yet defined.[91] Dioceses were organized into metropolitan sees under the authority of a metropolitan bishop. The position of metropolitan carried additional responsibilities and powers in the election of bishops.[92] Around 315 CE, the bishop of Seleucia-Ctesiphon, Mar Papa bar Aggai (310–329), declared the primacy of his see over other bishoprics in Mesopotamia and Persia. With the support of Sada, bishopric of Edessa, Papa adopted the title of Catholicos of the East.[Notes 5] Thus, assuming the sources are reliable,[Notes 6] the patriarchate in the East emerged before the Nicene Council, when the authority of the sees of Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch was first recognized.[93][94] The list of participants in the Nicene Council of 325 CE includes two bishops from Adiabene, John of Arbela and Jacob of Nisibis.[95] In Armenia, the ecclesiastical hierarchy began to form early, with higher positions often held by members of the old Parthian nobility. Gregory the Illuminator himself was from a nakharar family. His son Aristakes represented the Armenian Church at the Nicene Council.[96] In the 360s, nakharars Meruzhan Artsruni and Vahan Mamikonian [hy], with the support of the Persian army, attempted to restore Zoroastrianism in Armenia.[Notes 7] Two further attempts followed in 451 and 571 CE.[97]

There are differing views on whether the Church of the East was initially independent. According to one perspective, the catholicoses of Seleucia were entirely independent; according to others, they were subordinate either to the bishops of Antioch or Edessa.[98] Traditional Western historiography dated the founding of the Church of the East to the Ephesian Council of 431 CE, following theNestorian schism. In contrast, Eastern tradition asserts that by 431 CE, the Church of the East had long existed as a separate organization, and by the 7th century, the name of Nestorius was not mentioned in any acts of church councils.[99] Formally, autocephaly was proclaimed at the council in Seleucia-Ctesiphon in 410 CE.[84] Its canons established that each city and its surrounding area should be governed by a single bishop, ordained by three other bishops.[100][101] Uniform church holidays were also established, and the rules of the Nicene Council of 325 CE were recognized, adapted to the context of the Church of the East.[102] The fact that the 410 CE council was co-chaired by the Western bishop Marutha indicates the unity of the Church of the East with the Western church at that time.[103][104] Marutha persuaded Shah Yazdegerd I to recognize the bishop of Seleucia-Ctesiphon as the head of the Christians in his empire, thereby integrating the Christian church into the political system.[105] The principles of ecclesiastical organization were clarified in 544 CE by Patriarch Aba I. It was established that the election of a catholicos-patriarch required the assembly of four metropolitan bishops from the patriarchal province, each accompanied by three bishops. Under Ishoyahb I, the hierarchy of the Church of the East received a theological interpretation, likened to the heavens, with the patriarch symbolizing the apostles Peter and Paul at the head.[106]

No documents regarding the election of bishops before 410 CE have been preserved. For later periods, data from the Eastern Synodicon, compiled under Patriarch Timothy I and revised under Archbishop Elijah of Nisibis (d. 1049), can be used.[17] According to the earliest testimony in the Synodicon, a canon adopted at the Seleucia-Ctesiphon council in 410 CE required all hierarchs of the Church of the East to be subordinate to the bishop of Seleucia-Ctesiphon,[107] who was referred to in the council's acts as the Great or Grand Metropolitan and soon thereafter as the Catholicos of the East. Later, the title Catholicos-Patriarch was used.[108] Unlike the Roman Empire, the boundaries of the Church of the East's ecclesiastical provinces did not always align with the administrative boundaries of the Sasanian Empire. Reliable information about the structure of ecclesiastical organization in the early period has not been preserved. Data collected in the 18th century by Joseph Assemani and Michel Le Quien are difficult to interpret due to inconsistencies in geographical nomenclature. Later authors of diocese lists (J. Wiltsch, Carl Zachau, Beresford Kidd) lack consensus even on the number of metropolitan sees.[109] For most of its history, the Church had approximately six internal metropolitan sees. At the 410 CE council, they were listed in hierarchical order: metropolitan see of the capital centered in Seleucia-Ctesiphon (central Iraq), Beth Huzaye centered in Beth-Lapat (western Iran), Nisibis (on the border between Turkey and Iraq, centered in the city of the same name), Maishan (Basra, southern Iraq), the metropolitan see of Adiabene centered in Arbela (Erbil, northern Iraq), and Beth Garmaï in the region of the same name centered in Kirkuk, northeastern Iraq.[110][102] These metropolitan sees did not cover the entire Christian-populated territory of the Sasanian Empire. Independent bishops served the inhabitants of various remote regions, such as Pars and the "islands" (Beth Qatraye).[111] An influential Christian community with its own bishop existed in Merv as early as the first half of the 5th century.[112] Additionally, the number of external metropolitan sees located outside the Sasanian Empire grew. In 554 CE, the bishop of Kashkar received special status and authority to organize the election of a new patriarch.[113]

State and Church in the 5th–6th Centuries

[edit]
Nestorian church of Saint John from the 6th century in the Assyrian village of Geramon in the modern Turkish province of Şırnak

The 410 CE council established the church as an official structure. It was important for secular authorities to ensure control over the growing number of Christian subjects, while the catholicos could now resort to state enforcement methods in combating ecclesiastical opposition. The resulting balance was unstable and did not guarantee Christians full freedom of religion.[114] Yazdegerd I, in turn, relied on catholicoses to address internal political issues and maintain diplomatic contacts with the Roman Empire.[101][Notes 8] The resumption of persecutions at the end of Yazdegerd I's reign and the beginning of Bahram V's reign (421–439) is associated with dissatisfaction among Zoroastrian elites, the centralization of state institutions, and the renewed war with Rome.[115][117] The immediate cause, according to the hagiography of Bishop Abda, was the religious zeal of Christians who began destroying Zoroastrian temples. Yazdegerd's inability to manage radical Christian elements led to his death and turmoil within the Church of the East.[118][101]

Early in the patriarchate of Mar Dadisho I (421–456), a representative council in Markabta of the Arabs was convened, which reaffirmed the primacy of the bishop of Seleucia-Ctesiphon and abolished the right of appeal to the Western church.[119][120] The council's declaration of the catholicos's independence from the Western Fathers' should likely be understood in the context of internal church issues, as the proclamation of autocephaly in 410 CE was not contested.[121][122] Meanwhile, in the Roman Empire, the rivalry between the Alexandrian and Antiochian theological schools, culminating in the Nestorian schism, led to the migration of many of Nestorius's supporters to the Sasanian Empire. Antiochian theology, expressed in the works of Theodore of Mopsuestia and Ibas of Edessa, was rejected by the Western church but continued to dominate in the East.[123] Over the following decades, the theology of the church increasingly incorporated "Nestorian" elements, deepening the divide between the Roman church and the Church of the East. In 484 CE, the metropolitan of Nisibis, Barsauma, convened the Council of Beth Lapat, which permitted bishops to marry, deposed Barsauma's opponent, Catholicos Babai (457–484),[Notes 9][124][125] and adopted the teachings of Nestorius's mentor, Theodore of Mopsuestia, as the doctrine of the Church of the East.[126][127][128]

However, the 484 CE council was not recognized by the church, and its decisions were overturned the following year. Church unity was restored at the 486 CE council in Seleucia-Ctesiphon, where the oldest surviving creed, with a clear dyophysite orientation, was adopted.[129][130] In 489 CE, when the Persian school in Edessa was closed by Byzantine Emperor Zeno for its "Nestorian" character, it relocated to Nisibis, becoming the Nisibis School again, prompting an exodus of Nestorians to the Sasanian Empire.[131] The definitive shift toward Nestorianism is associated with the reign of Patriarch-Catholicos Mar Babai (497–502).[133] Under him, several councils were held, solidifying the church's adoption of Nestorianism.[134][135] Barsauma leveraged his good relations with Shah Peroz I (461–484) to organize persecutions of Monophysites in his diocese.[Notes 10][136]

Little is known about the status of Christians at the turn of the 5th and 6th centuries under Shahs Balash and Kavad I.[137] From 521 to 539 CE, the Church of the East experienced its first schism, caused by disputes over the succession to the patriarchal throne.[138] Meanwhile, having strengthened its structures in Nisibis, Ctesiphon, and Gondishapur, the Church of the East began to expand beyond the Sasanian Empire. Another Byzantine–Persian conflict (540–545) led to new persecutions of the church under Khosrow I. Christians were suspected of involvement in the rebellion of Prince Anoshazad, but Catholicos Aba I (540–552) managed to prove his co-religionists' innocence.[136] Under his energetic leadership, the church successfully weathered these trials and strengthened its structures.[135]

Although a 562 CE law conditioned freedom of Christian worship on the rejection of proselytism,[139] by the mid-century, the canonical territory of the Church of the East included all countries to the east and those immediately west of the Euphrates, encompassing the Arabian Peninsula, Socotra, Mesopotamia, Media, Bactria, Hyrcania, and India.[140] Excavations conducted in the 1930s south of Baghdad uncovered the remains of a late 6th-century church and ceramics with Syriac inscriptions.[141]

Inter-Church Conflicts in the Early 7th Century

[edit]

The Iranian community of the Syriac Jacobite Church reached its peak in the early 7th century, thanks to the support of Shah Khosrow II's (591–628) wife Shirin and court physician Gabriel of Sinjar, both of whom belonged to the Jacobite church.[142] According to the 12th-century chronicler Michael the Syrian, Khosrow II favored Monophysites, but the Byzantine Theophanes the Confessor claimed the shah continued to support Nestorians.[114] In 596 CE, at Khosrow II's initiative, the monk Sabrisho I (596–604) was elected patriarch. The unprecedented honors with which Khosrow greeted the newly elected head of the church strengthened the position of the Church of the East as a legitimate religious institution in the Sasanian Empire. Sabrisho, in turn, recognized the secular authority of the Zoroastrian ruler.[143] Nestorian catholicoses accompanied Persian military expeditions into Byzantine Mesopotamia in 537 and 603 CE.[136] During the Byzantine–Persian War of 602–628, Iranian forces occupied territories where the majority of the population were non-Chalcedonians. According to the Armenian historian Sebeos, during a church council in Ctesiphon (circa 616 CE) attended by representatives of the Church of the East, the Syriac Jacobite Church, and Chalcedonians, Khosrow II decreed that Miaphysite doctrine be mandatory for all Christians in Iran.[144] According to Russian researcher E. A. Zabolotny, in reality, the council merely announced that the Jacobite Church would receive patronage alongside the Church of the East.[144]

After the death of Patriarch Gregory in 609 CE, Khosrow prohibited the election of a new church head.[145] During the vacancy of the patriarchal throne (609–628), the Church of the East was effectively led by the theologian Babai the Great,[146] who implemented measures to strengthen and restore the church's position in Persia.[147] Canadian historian Geoffrey Greatrex [de] suggests that Khosrow II's actions were aimed at maintaining a balance between Nestorians and Monophysites. While the former were deprived of a leader for an extended period, the latter lost in the struggle for control over Mesopotamian monasteries.[145]

By 627–628 CE, the influence of the Jacobites in Iran had been restored when northern Mesopotamia was occupied by the Byzantine forces of Heraclius.[144] Heraclius pursued a policy of rapprochement with non-Chalcedonians, which allowed the Monophysite hierarchy in Iran to fully establish itself under Marutha of Tikrit (629–649). Marutha adopted the title of maphrian. During his tenure, the Arab conquest of Persia began. The last Sasanian shah, Yazdegerd III, was killed in 651 CE. According to the Arab scholar Al-Tha'alibi, a Christian bishop organized his burial.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Not all researchers, particularly I. M. Diakonov, recognize the Achaemenids as consistent Zoroastrians.
  2. ^ The exact meaning of these terms' distinction is a matter of debate.
  3. ^ Approximately 60 martyrdoms from the Sasanian period have survived.
  4. ^ As part of the Parthian Arsacid state, Armenia was the second most important kingdom after Iran. The Kaaba of Zoroaster inscription by Shapur I informs us about the conquest of Armenia and its inclusion in Eranshahr.
  5. ^ A Catholicos is an organizational form specific to the Eastern churches that has no direct equivalent in the West. The archdiocese can be considered a somewhat analogous form.
  6. ^ These events are reported only by the Chronicle of Arbela and the acts of the Seleucian Council of 424.
  7. ^ These events are described in the novel Samuel by the Armenian writer Raffi.
  8. ^ The available sources do not allow us to definitively reconstruct the chronology of events. Some argue that the persecution of Christians began at the start of Bahram V's reign, not under Yazdegerd I.
  9. ^ In the words of Catholic historian Adrian Fortescue, "The reign of the illiterate Babai was an expression of the extreme degradation of the Church".
  10. ^ These churches are widely defined as monophysite in historiography, including modern historiography. However, theologically speaking, it is considered more accurate to call their followers Miaphysites.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Russell 1987, p. 73.
  2. ^ Russell 1987, p. 85.
  3. ^ Pourshariati 2008, pp. 321–323.
  4. ^ Smith 2019, p. 129.
  5. ^ Cassis 2002, p. 70.
  6. ^ Brock 2006, p. 11.
  7. ^ Labourt 1904, p. 10.
  8. ^ Koltun-Fromm 2011, p. 60.
  9. ^ Saint-Laurent 2015, p. 56.
  10. ^ Harrak 2002, p. 48.
  11. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 925.
  12. ^ a b Seleznev 2001, p. 13.
  13. ^ Saint-Laurent 2015, p. 36.
  14. ^ Koltun-Fromm 2011, p. 59.
  15. ^ Harrak 2002, p. 51.
  16. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, p. 8.
  17. ^ a b Bruns 2011, p. 110.
  18. ^ Saint-Laurent 2015, p. 38.
  19. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 928.
  20. ^ Koltun-Fromm 2011, p. 58.
  21. ^ Daryaee 2009, p. 69.
  22. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 933.
  23. ^ a b Doroshenko 1982, p. 20.
  24. ^ a b Seleznev 2001, pp. 16–17.
  25. ^ de Jong 2005, p. 51.
  26. ^ Daryaee 2009, p. 75.
  27. ^ Boyce, M. (1970). "Toleranz und Intoleranz im Zoroastrismus". Saeculum (in German). 21: 325–343. doi:10.7788/saeculum.1970.21.jg.325.
  28. ^ Payne 2015, p. 25.
  29. ^ Shaked, S. (1990). "Administrative Functions of Priests in the Sasanian Period". Proceedings of the First European Conference of Iranian Studies. 1: 261–273.
  30. ^ Patterson 2017, p. 184.
  31. ^ Nikitin 2015, p. 166.
  32. ^ Becker 2014, pp. 9–11.
  33. ^ Mokhtarian 2015, p. 100.
  34. ^ Payne 2015, p. 30.
  35. ^ Russell 1987, pp. 89–91.
  36. ^ Jany 2007, pp. 347–349.
  37. ^ Jany 2007, p. 377.
  38. ^ Jany 2007, p. 352.
  39. ^ Jany 2007, p. 375.
  40. ^ a b Asmussen 1983, p. 934.
  41. ^ Jullien 2021, p. 4.
  42. ^ Smith 2019, p. 131.
  43. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 935.
  44. ^ Asmussen 1983, pp. 929–930.
  45. ^ a b Brock 1982, p. 7.
  46. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 936.
  47. ^ Jullien C., Jullien, F. (2002)
  48. ^ Asmussen 1983, pp. 928–929.
  49. ^ Smith 2019, p. 132.
  50. ^ Strong 2015.
  51. ^ Ter-Davtyan 1994, pp. 234–237.
  52. ^ Кolesnikov, A. I. (2006). "Persecution of Christians in Pre-Islamic Iran". Orthodox Encyclopedia (in Russian). Vol. 12. Moscow. pp. 49–50.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  53. ^ Patterson 2017, p. 183.
  54. ^ Daryaee 2009, pp. 15–16.
  55. ^ Barnes 1985, p. 130.
  56. ^ Barnes 1985, p. 131.
  57. ^ Eusebius (1999). "13". Life of Constantine. Vol. IV. Translated by Averil Cameron, Stuart G. Hall. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  58. ^ Brock 1982, p. 1.
  59. ^ Barnes 1985, p. 132.
  60. ^ Smith 2019, p. 19.
  61. ^ Smith 2019, p. 27.
  62. ^ Smith 2019, pp. 5–6.
  63. ^ Becker 2007, p. 375.
  64. ^ Angelov 2014, p. 289.
  65. ^ Burgess 1999.
  66. ^ Daryaee 2009, pp. 77–78.
  67. ^ Becker 2007, p. 376.
  68. ^ Burgess R. W., Mercier R. 1999, p. 19.
  69. ^ de Jong 2005, p. 52.
  70. ^ Burgess R. W., Mercier R. 1999, p. 9.
  71. ^ Burgess R. W., Mercier R. 1999, p. 12.
  72. ^ Burgess R. W., Mercier R. 1999, p. 20.
  73. ^ Burgess R. W., Mercier R. 1999, p. 10.
  74. ^ Burgess R. W., Mercier R. 1999, p. 21.
  75. ^ Foster 1939, pp. 26–27.
  76. ^ Seleznev 2001, p. 18.
  77. ^ Klingenberg 2017, p. 291.
  78. ^ Rapp 2014, p. 45.
  79. ^ Becker 2007, pp. 377–388.
  80. ^ Seleznev 2001, p. 22.
  81. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, p. 21.
  82. ^ McDonough 2008, p. 128.
  83. ^ Herman 2014, p. 68.
  84. ^ a b Klingenberg 2017, p. 293.
  85. ^ a b c Alexis (2001). Pravoslavnaâ ènciklopediâ. Moskva: Pravoslavnaâ ènciklopediâ. ISBN 978-5-89572-008-0.
  86. ^ Russell 1987, p. 92.
  87. ^ Ter-Davtyan 1994, pp. 249–250.
  88. ^ Ter-Davtyan 1994, pp. 255–259.
  89. ^ Russell 1987, p. 91.
  90. ^ McDonough 2011, p. 305.
  91. ^ Labourt 1904, p. 20.
  92. ^ Bruns 2011, pp. 115–120.
  93. ^ Roberson 1999, p. 15.
  94. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, pp. 9–10.
  95. ^ Klingenberg 2017, p. 286.
  96. ^ Russell 1987, p. 127.
  97. ^ Russell 1987, p. 129.
  98. ^ Labourt 1904, pp. 11–12.
  99. ^ Brock 2006, p. 8.
  100. ^ Kolesnikov, A. I. (2011). "Isaac". Orthodox Encyclopedia (in Russian). Vol. 26. Moscow. pp. 678–679.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  101. ^ a b c Wood 2012.
  102. ^ a b Baum & Winkler 2003, p. 13.
  103. ^ Brock 1995, p. 40.
  104. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, pp. 17–19.
  105. ^ Payne 2015, p. 13.
  106. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, pp. 33–35.
  107. ^ Zabolotny 2020, p. 273.
  108. ^ Reva 2019, p. 110.
  109. ^ Vine 1978, p. 56.
  110. ^ Seleznev 2001, pp. 20–21.
  111. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 932.
  112. ^ Nikitin 2015, p. 167.
  113. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, p. 32.
  114. ^ a b Greatrex 2003, p. 79.
  115. ^ McDonough 2008, p. 131.
  116. ^ Herman 2014, p. 90.
  117. ^ Available sources do not allow for a definitive reconstruction of the chronology of events. There are arguments suggesting that the persecution of Christians occurred only at the beginning of Bahram V's reign, not under Yazdegerd I[116].
  118. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 940.
  119. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 941.
  120. ^ Kolesnikov, A. I. (2006). "Dadisho". Orthodox Encyclopedia (in Russian). Vol. 13. Moscow. p. 639.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  121. ^ Jugie 1935.
  122. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, pp. 19–21.
  123. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, pp. 21–26.
  124. ^ Muravyov, A. V. (2002). "Bar Sauma". Orthodox Encyclopedia (in Russian). Vol. 4. Moscow. pp. 349–350.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  125. ^ Kolesnikov, A. I. (2002). "Babai". Orthodox Encyclopedia (in Russian). Vol. 4. Moscow. p. 242.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  126. ^ "Council of Beth Lapat". Orthodox Encyclopedia (in Russian). Vol. 5. Moscow. 2002. pp. 16–17.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  127. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, pp. 28–29.
  128. ^ Zabolotny 2020, pp. 240–242.
  129. ^ Vine 1978, pp. 50–51.
  130. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, pp. 28–30.
  131. ^ Brock 2006, p. 73.
  132. ^ Fortescue 1913, p. 82.
  133. ^ According to Catholic historian Adrian Fortescue [], the reign of the illiterate Babai marked the extreme degradation of the church[132].
  134. ^ Vine 1978, p. 52.
  135. ^ a b "Nestorianism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 2021-01-02.
  136. ^ a b c Greatrex 2003, p. 80.
  137. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 945.
  138. ^ Baum & Winkler 2003, pp. 32–33.
  139. ^ Asmussen 1983, p. 946.
  140. ^ Stewart 1928, pp. 13–14.
  141. ^ Cassis, M. C. (2011). Kokhe. Gorgias Press LLC. p. 244. ISBN 978-1-59333-714-8.
  142. ^ Zabolotny 2020, p. 278.
  143. ^ Payne 2015, pp. 3–4.
  144. ^ a b c Zabolotny 2020, p. 279.
  145. ^ a b Greatrex 2003, p. 82.
  146. ^ Seleznev 2001, p. 28.
  147. ^ Malech 1910, p. 242.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Ter-Davtyan, K. (1994). Армянские жития и мученичества V — XVII вв [Armenian hagiographies and martyrdoms of the 5th - 17th centuries] (in Russian). Ереван: Наири. p. 484.
  • Brock, S. (1995). Христология Церкви Востока [Christology of the Eastern Church] (in Russian). Вестник древней истории. pp. 39–53.
  • Doroshenko, E. A. (1982). Зороастрийцы в Иране: историко-этнографический очерк [Zoroastrians in Iran: historical and ethnographic sketch] (in Russian). М.: Наука. p. 136.
  • Zabolotny, E. A. (2020). Сирийское христианство между Византией и Ираном [Syrian Christianity between Byzantium and Iran] (in Russian). СПб.: Наука. p. 406. ISBN 978-5-02-040526-4.
  • Nikitin, A. B. (2015). "К истории христианства в Мерве" [Toward a History of Christianity in Merv]. Проблемы истории, филологии, культуры (in Russian). 1 (47): 164–170.
  • Reva, K. A. (2019). Богослужение Ассирийской церкви Востока: история и современность [Worship of the Assyrian Church of the East: History and Modernity] (in Russian). Сергиев Посад: Актуальные вопросы изучения христианского наследия Востока. pp. 109–124. ISBN 978-5-6042773-6-2.
  • Seleznev, N. N. (2001). Ассирийская церковь Востока. Исторический очерк [The Assyrian Church of the East. Historical sketch] (in Russian). М. p. 105. ISBN 5-86748-082-8.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

English-language sources

[edit]

German-language sources

[edit]
  • Bruns, P. (2011). Bischofswahl und Bischofsernennung im Synodicon Orientale // Episcopal Elections in Late Antiquity [Bishop elections and bishop appointments in the Synodicon Orientale // Episcopal Elections in Late Antiquity]. Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte (in German). Rome: De Gruyter. pp. 109–126. ISBN 978-3-11-026860-7.
  • Hutter, M. (1998). Shirin, Nestorianer und Monophysiten. Königliche Kirchenpolitik im späten Sasanidenreich [Shirin, Nestorians and Monophysites. Royal church politics in the late Sasanian Empire] (in German). Roma: Pontificio Istituto Orientale. pp. 373–386.
  • Klingenberg, A. (2017). Zwischen Ktesiphon und Konstantinopel – Christen und Christianisierung in Persien im Kontext der sāsānidish-römischen Beziehungen // Die Christianisierung Kleinasiens in der Spätantike [Between Ctesiphon and Constantinople - Christians and Christianization in Persia in the context of Sāsānidish-Roman relations // The Christianization of Asia Minor in Late Antiquity]. Asia Minor Studien (in German). Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH. pp. 109–126. ISBN 978-3-7749-4104-5.

French-language sources

[edit]
  • Jugie, M. (1935). "L'ecclésiologie des nestoriens" [The ecclesiology of Nestorians]. Revue des études byzantines [Byzantine Studies journal] (in French). 34 (177): 5–25. doi:10.3406/rebyz.1935.2817.
  • Jullien C., Jullien, F. (2002). Aux frontières de l'iranité: «nāsrāyē» et «krīstyonē» des inscriptions du mobad KirdīR: enquête littéraire et historique [At the frontiers of Iranianness: "nāsrāyē" and "krīstyonē" inscriptions from mobad KirdīR: literary and historical investigation] (in French). Vol. 49. Numen. pp. 282–335.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Labourt, J. (1904). Le christianisme dans l'empire Perse [Christianity in the Persian Empire] (in French). Paris. p. 358.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)