Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skanke: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:28, 17 July 2007

Skanke

The article is a hoax and consists of pure fiction. There doesn't even exist a single family called Skanke, and there was never any noble family called Skanke, nor are those using that surname the rulers of Man or anywhere else. See also Talk:Skanke Family Association#Hoax. Luvente 15:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BJAODN, rather elaborate hoax at work here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 16:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: At least a partial hoax by the look of it (ie the info relating to Royal connections). Unfortunately, without that, the article subject becomes non-notable. EyeSerene^TALK 18:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And what about the Manx history works which support the case? They're just to be ignored?Manxruler 10:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - see [Google Surname search Skanke] How can there be no surname? Can so many geneology sites be wrong? Shureley shome mishtake. Mike33 11:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
More sources to come - Tomorrow I'll add some more sources, I've requested them, and their on their way to me as we speak. Manxruler 11:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 *::And what about the Manx history works which support the case? They're just to be ignored?[[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] 10:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Speedy Keep''' - see [[http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1T4IRFA_enGB232&q=skanke+surname+-wikipedia+-answers&meta= Google Surname search Skanke]] How can there be no surname? Can so many geneology sites be wrong? Shureley shome mishtake. [[User:Mike33|Mike33]] 11:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
+*'''More sources to come''' - Tomorrow I'll add some more sources, I've requested them, and their on their way to me as we speak. [[User:Manxruler|Manxruler]] 11:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)