Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mike1901: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
c
 
Nomination: nom nom
Line 4: Line 4:


====Nomination====
====Nomination====
{{User|Mike1901}} –
{{User|Mike1901}}&nbsp;– YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER -- [[User:Samtar|'''sam'''''tar'']] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Samtar|talk]] or [[Special:Contributions/Samtar|stalk]]</small></sup> 13:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Keeping the ball rolling with RfA candidates, I today would like to present Mike1901 for your consideration. Mike is a well rounded contributor to Wikipedia, with a decent amount of [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/pages/?user=Mike1901&project=en.wikipedia.org&namespace=all&redirects=noredirects content creation] and improvement under his belt, mixed nicely with experience in anti-vandalism and a hearty helping of civility.


Mike has demonstrated his understanding of policy through the [https://tools.wmflabs.org/supercount/index.php?project=en.wikipedia.org&user=Mike1901 171 reports] made to [[WP:AIV|AIV]] and the mainspace contributions he has made over his fourteen months or so of actively editing.

Through those months, Mike has closed a number of discussions - the most notable of which is mentioned in the answer to question 2. Some may be concerned at this, but I would like to perhaps turn your attention to the fact the close was ultimately accepted. I believe this shows an ability to read consensus and a boldness to handle controversial topics - something germane to adminship.

Mike also works heavily at [[WP:OTRS|OTRS]] and on [[WP:IRC|IRC]], where he assists new and inexperienced users. I hope you can join me today in supporting a fine candidate -- [[User:Samtar|'''sam'''''tar'']] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Samtar|talk]] or [[Special:Contributions/Samtar|stalk]]</small></sup> 13:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''<!-- The candidate may make an optional statement here. If this request is a self nomination, feel free to remove this line. -->
:''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''<!-- The candidate may make an optional statement here. If this request is a self nomination, feel free to remove this line. -->



Revision as of 13:11, 2 January 2017

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end You're almost there. All you need to do now is substitute the time parser function (it isn't as scary as it sounds, edit the page and inline comments will guide you). This will generate a fixed end time. Remove the <!-- and --> around subst: in the template (as well as this comment) once you transclude this request.

Nomination

Mike1901 (talk · contribs) – Keeping the ball rolling with RfA candidates, I today would like to present Mike1901 for your consideration. Mike is a well rounded contributor to Wikipedia, with a decent amount of content creation and improvement under his belt, mixed nicely with experience in anti-vandalism and a hearty helping of civility.

Mike has demonstrated his understanding of policy through the 171 reports made to AIV and the mainspace contributions he has made over his fourteen months or so of actively editing.

Through those months, Mike has closed a number of discussions - the most notable of which is mentioned in the answer to question 2. Some may be concerned at this, but I would like to perhaps turn your attention to the fact the close was ultimately accepted. I believe this shows an ability to read consensus and a boldness to handle controversial topics - something germane to adminship.

Mike also works heavily at OTRS and on IRC, where he assists new and inexperienced users. I hope you can join me today in supporting a fine candidate -- samtar talk or stalk 13:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A:
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A:
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Discussion


Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Support


Oppose


Neutral


General comments