User talk:JJBers: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 791789919 by StephenTS42 (talk) are you serious |
You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule on West Haven, Connecticut. (TW) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
::I've undone the edit as you broke the existing reports too for task forces that already had them. Please take better care in the future. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 18:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC) |
::I've undone the edit as you broke the existing reports too for task forces that already had them. Please take better care in the future. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 18:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
:::Alright, I fixed it. —[[User:JJBers|<font color="red">JJ</font>]][[User Talk:JJBers|<font color="green">B<sup>e</sup></font>]][[Special:Contributions/JJBers|<font color="blue"><sup>rs</sup></font>]] 18:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC) |
:::Alright, I fixed it. —[[User:JJBers|<font color="red">JJ</font>]][[User Talk:JJBers|<font color="green">B<sup>e</sup></font>]][[Special:Contributions/JJBers|<font color="blue"><sup>rs</sup></font>]] 18:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
== July 2017 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:West Haven, Connecticut]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 16:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> |
|||
Revision as of 16:15, 22 July 2017
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
References
- ^ Calculated using parser functions. For more information see WP:CCT. To update time .
 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #10 |
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. StephenTS42 (talk) 15:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect entries on popular pages bot config
Hello there! I saw you added some task forces to the popular pages bot config. Thank you for doing that. I wanted to point out that the "Name" field for these should be "U.S. Roads/<name-of-task-force>" because the bot derives it's config from a database which names projects like this to avoid problems when multiple projects have similarly named task forces. So if you could fix that edit and prefix the "Name" field values with "U.S. Roads/" , it'd be so awesome. Thank you. Feel free to reach out if you want help fixing it or in general to help out with the project. :) -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 00:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- @NKohli (WMF): It would be wonderful if you could fix it, but if you can't, I'll fix it tomorrow. —JJBers 02:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- @JJBers: Sorry, I haven't got time to fix it right now. I can do it later today or tomorrow if you can't. -- NKohli (WMF) (talk) 17:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- I've undone the edit as you broke the existing reports too for task forces that already had them. Please take better care in the future. --Rschen7754 18:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Alright, I fixed it. —JJBers 18:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)