User talk:Imoeng: Difference between revisions

Home Contribution Edit Count Indonesia Sandbox Talk Monobook Userspace

Click here to leave a new message.

If you send me a message, I will reply it on your talk page, not mine, yours. Otherwise, just tell me to reply it here. Cheers.

Archives

This talk page is archived when it hits 30kb. Archive 1 (July 23, 2006 - August 19, 2006 Archive 2 (August 19, 2006 - September 21, 2006) Archive 3 (September 22, 2006 - October 14, 2006) Archive 4 (October 15, 2006 - October 28 2006)

“ I wish people who have trouble communicating would just shut up. ” — Tom Lehrer

Toraja photos

Hi Imoeng, thanks for asking the picture. Now the article has more life. Cheers. — Indon (reply) — 12:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that would be great. Let's do it together until FA ;-) Anyway, I like the picture of a girl with traditional Toraja picture from the website. That's what Michael wants to be included in the article. BTW, what do you think that we need to get the article reaches FA? — Indon (reply) — 07:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

It's a deal. :-) BTW, did you notice a user, named Kmadams, just added a new item in the Further Reading section in the Toraja article? She is, I think, Kathleen M Adams, one expert of Toraja. I've used a lot of her articles in the references. It's good that an expert joined in, huh? I left her a note in her talk page. Wondering whether she replies or not. Cheers. — Indon (reply) — 10:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't mind at all. I would be very happy to see other names beside Indon in the article's history. ;-) Well, it is so difficult for me here to do chatting. It's a bit restricted. Sorry for that. — Indon (reply) — 10:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Collaboration

I say extend it, but personally, I won't be around much the next few weeks. --Merbabu 13:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Indonesia bot

Hi, I'm happy to make User:MartinBotII do this for you. You can put the message on User:MartinBotII/WPIndonesiaMsg, and then, if you leave me a message on my talk page, I can make the bot do the delivery. Does this sound like a reasonable way for it to operate? I'll get on with writing it, and apply at WP:BRFA for permission. Thanks, Martinp23 14:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

The other alternative is to make the bot look at the page every week, and if then post that (the only problem with this is that it imposes a deadline on you). Martinp23 14:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

OK - if you'd be able to put the message text here, then tell me it's ready on my talk page, then I'll send it (the first run will, pending acceptance at WP:BRFA, be next week). If I know I won't be available one week, I'll set the bot to do it automatically. Actually, thinking about it a bit further (considering the message is always done on Sunday mornings), it would be more reliable to have the bot deliver the message at midnoght/late evening on the Sunday, to avoid me missing the message. Let me know what you think :) Martinp23 14:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem - I'm experimenting with the bot :P - is 2200 on the Sunday (UTC) OK? Martinp23 14:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry - you're not trolling at all! (I like the orange banner :)) I'll change the checkpage when I get round to more bot-building (I won't be hard to do). Thanks, Martinp23 17:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Help

Thanks for helping me out with everything. If I need any help I'll give you holler.

Thanks, -Gphoto (talk) 01:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Virtual GA review of Indonesia

Hi Imoeng, sure. However, GA really depends on the reviewer. Some reviewers are so nitpicking, as we had for Indonesia before, but some are not. I'll try to make a GA review with my style, but more nitpicking to the article for this case. In a moment.... ;-) — Indon (reply) — 12:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Imoeng, sorry to take 2 days to review Indonesia. I have put the review in my GA assesement template. Please read it and give me a comment. I think the odd is still slim. Prose is the major concern. Cheers. — Indon (reply) — 01:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

(hahaha), I know that you would ask the last request. I'll try my best. I think I can help in the sources/citations/references. BTW, if an article is long, then it is less likely to get faster review in GA. FAC is the best place, I think, but the article should get into another PR round one more time. Cheers. — Indon (reply) — 09:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Page cleanup

I've replied on your Meta talk page. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Religion in Indonesia

First my apologies - I did not mean to over-do the complexity of the issue, or send too many posts to that page!

My living in Kupang, Yogyakarta and Jakarta in the early 1990's suggested to me that the distinction between Katolik and Protestan was important, I never heard any of my muslim friends at that time ever reduce it to kristen.

I promise you a barnstar (yes) - if you can possibly google the issue - I have my doubts about whether there is anything -to find any references or online articles that

(a) explain religion and indonesian constitution (b) explain the politics of 1945 constitution and why it ended up that way for religion. Best of luck! SatuSuro 09:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your response - very sorry about hassling you in the Tourism collab days, maaf maaf ? Saya kurang hormat waktu itu.- I think I might have a few clues, if I find them they might help - but I am slipping between Western Tasmania, Western Australia, and zaman G30SPKI in my mind, (not very helpful!) Mudah mudahan - I should have some clues for the religion article soon! SatuSuro 10:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

As my entry says in list of contributors - scattered - Seperti keliling - will try to get something, but not sure when. SatuSuro 12:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Portal:photography

Hey Imoeng, do you think that the photography portal could be featured? If not, could you tell me what should be done do make it an FP?

Thanks,

-Gphoto (talk) 14:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:PF

Thanks! It looks really good! -Gphoto 12:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:PHOTO

WP:PHOTO looks good. -Gphoto 12:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)