User talk:Bradv: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:56, 1 March 2019

Messages

Please help keep discussions together.

If I left you a message on your talk page, please reply there (and ping me}.
If you leave me a message on my talk page, I will answer here.
If you have already started a conversation on this page, please reply there.

Click here to begin a new topic

Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
View or search the archives for old messages.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Links

Need Help?

Policies and Guidelines

I need your help enacting changes to a page

Page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Styalz_Fuego.

You helped me a couple of weeks ago and I'm unsure where to go next Look at the talk section of the page, I've added in my recommended changes but no one has gotten back to me?

ChrisClbr (talk) 05:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clickable links for NPP flowchart?

Hi there, I just wanted to let you know that I created an svg file to try to add clickable links to the NPP flowchart. The original PNG has just had minor updates, but I also created an svg file at File:NPP flowchart.svg. When you navigate fully to the raw svg file in a new tab (/media/wikipedia/en/f/f4/NPP_flowchart.svg) the links are clickable, but I'm not sure if there is a way of getting it to be clickable on-wiki. If there is, it would be great to have it work with clickable links from the sidebar of your superlinks script. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 06:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Insertcleverphrasehere, this is really cool. I will look at integrating it into Superlinks. Right now I'm just loading the png, but I'll see if I can load the svg instead and get the links to work. Cheers. Bradv🍁 15:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Sir, no offense or anything, but I would like your feeling regarding this. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 10:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ImmortalWizard: I'm not offended by your question. You can read my take on that event at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-10-28/Opinion. It was also covered in several other articles in that issue of the Signpost, and there are some conversations in my talk page archives. Hope that helps. Bradv🍁 15:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, we all make mistakes. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 18:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so you're just trolling me. I thought you were genuinely interested in this topic. Bradv🍁 18:58, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No no, I wasn't trolling, I was genuinely interested. Hows this a troll? THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 19:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 3

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (February 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the third issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Scripts Submit your new/improved script here

Bradv's Superlinks

Abelmoschus Esculentus: Discussion Closer • Edit Filter False Positives Response Helper

PrimeHunter's Search sorter • Reinischmax's Internet Archive Books

Erutuon's Charinsert-names • DannyS712's De-Stub • Evad37's Timeless New Message Highlighter

RhinosF1's Status Changer • Suffusion of Yellow's Filter Highlighter

Timotheus Canens's SPI Helper (now in 1.6.8)

Open tasks

Evad37 has raised the idea for a pseudo-namespace be created for "script modules". Find out more and discuss here
Cyberpower678 has proposed adding a "Read Now" feature for book references; a working demo is available.
FR30799386 has also suggested making their mobileUndo script into a gadget

Miscellaneous

Following a discussion, a new process for reviewing code for user-scripts and gadgets has been created.

See Wikipedia:Code review for more.

This month we welcomed three new interface administrators: Evad37, Galobtter, and Enterprisey.
On a sadder note, just this morning we said goodbye to Abelmoschus Esculentus, a prolific script writer.

We are three months in to this newsletter and everything is going great–keep on creating amazing new scripts!
Who knows–maybe the scripts will take over one day... --DannyS712 (talk) 17:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending requests WikiProject Portals is looking for some help making scripts...

to help build navboxes
to simplify adding links to portals
and even to make creating the portals easier
other open requests are available at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests

BLPN

I have mentioned you on the BLP noticeboard. Tornado chaser (talk) 18:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Jenny McCarthy Bradv🍁 19:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Jussie Smollett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jussie Smollett. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moving discussion...?

Hey Bradv!

So, I was thinking that maybe we should take the discussion off WP:AN/I and instead do a more all encompassing RfC. Here is a link to the draft so far: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-02-28/Humour/RfC.

Would this be possible in your view? Should I bother? I just think that this probably should just be one centralized discussion.

Many thanks! ―MattLongCT -Talk-^☖ 18:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MattLongCT, I wouldn't. You'll just end up with having the discussion in yet another place. There still needs to be a deletion discussion, and there still needs to be a block/unblock discussion. Those are happening at the appropriate venues. Bradv🍁 18:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:54, 1 March 2019 edit MJL (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 42,538 edits →Moving discussion...?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:56, 1 March 2019 edit undo Bradv (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators 37,881 edits →Moving discussion...?: Replying to MattLongCT (reply-link) Next edit →
Line 105:		Line 105:

	Many thanks! ―<span style="font-family:CG Times">[[User:MattLongCT\|<span style="color:black">MattLongCT</span>]] <b>-[[User talk:MattLongCT\|Talk]]-</b><sup style="font-size:75%">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Connecticut\|☖]]</sup></span> 18:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)		Many thanks! ―<span style="font-family:CG Times">[[User:MattLongCT\|<span style="color:black">MattLongCT</span>]] <b>-[[User talk:MattLongCT\|Talk]]-</b><sup style="font-size:75%">[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Connecticut\|☖]]</sup></span> 18:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
			:{{u\|MattLongCT}}, I wouldn't. You'll just end up with having the discussion in yet another place. There still needs to be a deletion discussion, and there still needs to be a block/unblock discussion. Those are happening at the appropriate venues. <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User_talk:Bradv\|Brad''v'']]</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bradv\|<span style="color:red">🍁</span>]] 18:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)