User talk:82.132.214.106: Difference between revisions
Praxidicae (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by 82.132.214.106 (talk) to last version by Usernamekiran |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
I apologise for the confusion. I will not do that again. —usernamekiran [[User talk:usernamekiran|(talk)]] 14:59, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
I apologise for the confusion. I will not do that again. —usernamekiran [[User talk:usernamekiran|(talk)]] 14:59, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.214.106|82.132.214.106]] ([[User talk:82.132.214.106#top|talk]]) 15:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:01, 25 July 2020
![]() | New messages will appear at the bottom of this page. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Administrators may want to consider using a range block as cellular IPs change frequently. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
March 2016
Hello, I'm Chesnaught555. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Foghorn Leghorn— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ches (talk) 19:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
July 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. groig (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. groig (talk) 20:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
December 2018
Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bristol Rovers F.C. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. GirthSummit (blether) 16:01, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
April 2019
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Uckfield— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk 16:49, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from De vulgaire geschiedenis van Charelke Dop, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —usernamekiran(talk) 14:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm an anonymous editor, but not the creator of that article. Please go back and look at how the other editor did a drive-by tagging with half a dozen speedy rationales, all entirely ineligible. Thanks. 82.132.214.106 (talk) 14:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to De vulgaire geschiedenis van Charelke Dop. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. —usernamekiran(talk) 14:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
I apologise for the confusion. I will not do that again. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:59, 25 July 2020 (UTC)