Page history
20 September 2021
28 October 2019
9 September 2019
5 June 2019
19 February 2019
10 October 2018
23 December 2017
12 March 2017
25 August 2016
4 June 2016
3 October 2015
29 September 2015
26 June 2015
15 January 2015
→Botany
m+2
→Botany
m+2
→Botany: oops, holotypes are not necessarily said to be types either
−27
number agreement and simplified linking
−15
→Botany: rewrote section
+878
to say in that position that there can only be one holotype is a bit confusing because there can be many isotypes; paratypes are "used" in the original description, that's how they become paratypes
−91
Dating maintenance tags: {{What?}}
m+18
doesn't make sense
+53
→top
−131
trying again with some explanation of taxa
+127
Reverted to revision 636790977 by Animalparty (talk): Let's define taxon before using the term. (TW)
−61