User talk:104.246.113.199: Difference between revisions

December 2021

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, December 2015 North American storm complex, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

List of Possible F5/EF5 Discussions

Hello. This is just a little heads up that there is a large, ongoing discussion to clean-up the List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes section on possible F5/EF5 tornadoes. You previously had an interest tornado related articles, so I wanted to alert you to the discussions. You can participate or watch here. Elijahandskip (talk) 14:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

104.246.113.199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The SPI did not do a good job proving this innocent IP is a sock. Just added a new one with a matching WHOIS. ChessEric (talk · contribs) 23:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC) Over 3 million people live on Long Island, so common WHOIS is to be expected. 104.246.113.199 (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The audacity of that last sentence is enough to deny this one. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

104.246.113.199 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yet again, evidence was rather meager. Literally all the evidence provided fell back on the previous block from March-June 2023. Admins seem to be really excited to block these Long Island IPs for no reason whatsoever. 104.246.113.199 (talk) 20:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm sick and tired of your continued trolling. I'm going to start extending these blocks whenever I see you deliberately wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 21:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.