Talk:The Scream (album): Difference between revisions

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Scream (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/siouxsieandthebanshees/albums/album/106537/review/5941624/the_scream

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Julie Burchill

I am concerned by the addition of this [edit].. The contributor obviously doesn't own the original and did a copy/paste from this [site], exactly presenting the same way with

firstly "Album Review by Julie Burchill WELL, WHATEVER WOULD EDVARD MUNCH HAVE SAID? SIOUXSIE AND THE BANSHEES The Scream (Polydor)". This is blatant. The contributor doesn't have the original, he can not advance the veracity of this article and if this sentence was published in the paper. This is why it is wiser to withdraw it the mistakes are very common on this fansite and we are not entirely sure if it is a review by Julie and not an article published in another paper. Carliertwo (talk) 21:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

I have added a link to a scan of NME Originals: Goth. The Burchill review is on page 13 of the scan (originally page 45 of the relevant issue of the NME). PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

• I think that this edit shoudl be place in the article instead of Pale's edit.

In the same paper, 19 year old Julie Burchill also published a scathing review in which "she flung everything she could about the band", according to biographer Brian Johns.Johns, Brian. Entranced the Siouxsie and the Banshees story. Omnibus Press. p. 31. ISBN 0-7119-1773-6. Burchill's review of The Scream, also including a criticism of the inclusion of an instrumental, was slagged a week later in the columns of Sounds by John Peel who made fun of the young journalist, saying that contrary to what she advanced, there are a lot of notable instrumentals on albums.Peel, John (25 November 1978), "John Peel", Sounds, Note to Julie Burchill. Re her review of The Scream. Chuck Berry recorded several intrumentals, notably Guitar Boogie, Blue Feeling and Deep Feeling. [...] I mention this only because I think of no other way in which I can demonstrate to Julie that age can have some advantages. Carliertwo (talk) 06:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Pale's will to include a derogatory term such as "The Sound of suet pudding" shows how his frame of mind. Be ready to see him post plenty of negative, things on SATB articles shortly and in the forthcoming years ~~