User talk:Mayerroute5: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:51, 6 July 2018

December 2017

Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lionel Messi— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 09:03, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Once someone has reverted your edits, you should discuss on the talk page, not repeatedly reinstate the same edit across multiple pages. You appear to have violated the three-revert rule at Template:2018_IPL_match_58, and continuing to reinstate the edit will likely lead to you getting blocked. Please communicate, thanks. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Home ground

Home ground conditions only apply when there is home-away match in league stage. In the playoffs that isn't the case. Human (talk) 08:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 12:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David de Gea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 20:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Greetings,

Just wanted to let you know there's an ANI report regarding an issue you're involved with. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Continuation_of_disruptive_edits_by_Mayerroute5_on_return_from_ban when you have time. AryaTargaryen (talk) 05:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)AryaTargaryen[reply]

July 2018

Your recent editing history at 2018 Formula One World Championship shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mayerroute5, it has now been three days since you made those edits. You have not made any attempts to justify your edits and a third party has pointed out that there is a valid edit-consensus. As such, I am going to restore the original "[note #]" format on both the F1 and F2 articles. If you wish to change these back, please continue the discussion on the talk page. If you continue to revert the edits without discussing them, your actions may be considered disruptive and you will be referred to the admins. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 21:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:05, 4 July 2018 edit Oshwah (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators 497,406 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on 2018 Formula One World Championship. (TW) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:51, 6 July 2018 edit undo Prisonermonkeys (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 35,281 edits No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Next edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:

	'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule\|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting\|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Oshwah\|<b><span style="color:#C00000">~Oshwah~</span></b>]]<sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Oshwah\|<span style="color:blue">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Oshwah\|<span style="color:green">(contribs)</span>]]</b></small></sup> 23:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC)		'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy\|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule\|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting\|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Oshwah\|<b><span style="color:#C00000">~Oshwah~</span></b>]]<sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Oshwah\|<span style="color:blue">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Oshwah\|<span style="color:green">(contribs)</span>]]</b></small></sup> 23:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

			:Mayerroute5, it has now been three days since you made those edits. You have not made any attempts to justify your edits and a third party has pointed out that there is a valid [[WP:EDITCONSENSUS\|edit-consensus]]. As such, I am going to restore the original "[note #]" format on both the F1 and F2 articles. If you wish to change these back, please continue the discussion on the talk page. If you continue to revert the edits without discussing them, your actions may be considered [[WP:DISRUPT\|disruptive]] and you will be referred to the admins. [[User:Prisonermonkeys\|Prisonermonkeys]] ([[User talk:Prisonermonkeys\|talk]]) 21:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)