Related changes

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.

Namespace:	Invert selection Associated namespace
Tag filter:	Invert selection
Page name:	Show changes to pages linked to the given page instead

List of abbreviations (help):

D: Edit made at Wikidata
r: Edit flagged by ORES
N: New page
m: Minor edit
b: Bot edit
(±123): Page byte size change
: Temporarily watched page

8 June 2025

diffhist Wikipedia:Protection policy 01:23 −8 Remsense talk contribs (→As escalation from semi-protection)

6 June 2025

diffhist m Demi Moore 13:56 −29 Yamla talk contribs (Reverted edit by Ortiz de Vilhegas (talk) to last version by AndyTheGrump) Tag: Rollback
diffhist Demi Moore 11:16 +29 Ortiz de Vilhegas talk contribs Tags: Reverted possible BLP issue or vandalism

4 June 2025

diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 14:20 −3 Klbrain talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: 'Should'' to 'can'; there does doesn't seem to be a need for compulsion - controversial topics are well-watched, so template are more likely to be noticed.)

3 June 2025

diffhist Demi Moore 18:16 −599 AndyTheGrump talk contribs (Undid revision 1293775244 by Rover9164 (talk) Source cited appears to be a copyright violation, and we couldn't cite a 1997 source for 'is' anything.) Tag: Undo
diffhist Demi Moore 16:09 +599 Rover9164 talk contribs (→Early life: Added half brother Charles Foster Harmon Jr. Navy SEAL) Tags: Reverted Visual edit

1 June 2025

diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 18:14 +15 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Let's try flipping it around, so the lead sentence of the section is about initiating a proposing a merge via discussion, which is after all, the section's main purpose. The part about a bold merge now appears just after that intro, and I think makes more sense this way.)
diffhist Wikipedia:Merging 18:03 −9 Mathglot talk contribs (→Proposing a merge: Tweaking shortcut placement, but there are pros and cons: pro: this seems clearer and places each one next to the content it applies to; con: it places INIT and PROP below BOLD, although the latter refers only to a sentence. Might be better to rearrange the text, so that the section is described first, and bold only in a latter sentence, as it is a minor part of this section, and place BOLD below the others.)