Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
17 June 2025
- diffhist Module:Navbox/configuration 20:06 −1 Ahecht talk contribs (Fix type (colhfooterstyle → colfooterstyle))
16 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 12:22 +53 Pineapple Storage talk contribs (→Variation in citation methods: adding shortcuts)
- diffhist University of Cambridge 05:35 +27 Tbhotch talk contribs (Adding {{pp-protected}}) Tag: Twinkle
15 June 2025
- Protection log 15:07 Ohnoitsjamie talk contribs protected University of Cambridge [Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 15:07, 15 July 2025) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 15:07, 15 July 2025) (Persistent sockpuppetry) (hist)
- diffhist University of Cambridge 15:07 −21 Ohnoitsjamie talk contribs (block evasion) Tags: Addition of protection template to non-protected page Manual revert
- diffhist University of Cambridge 00:50 +4 71.89.225.182 talk (casting proper word-choice in front of the 'which') Tag: Reverted
- diffhist University of Cambridge 00:37 +14 71.89.225.182 talk (clarified) Tag: Reverted
14 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 21:03 −147 GreenC talk contribs (removed sentence repeats the same information: "nor are they a help desk for obtaining instructions or technical assistance". Section is missing the most common abuse of talk pages: voicing personal opinions. Reference Desk is for questions about other than Wikipedia. It has its own guidelines.)
- diffhist University of Cambridge 15:53 +7 71.89.225.182 talk (articulation) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist University of Cambridge 15:51 −4 71.89.225.182 talk (critically 'used'; Why: It's a direct, plain synonym for "employed" in this context, and is clearer and more familiar to most readers.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist University of Cambridge 15:44 +17 71.89.225.182 talk (active bracketing of the 'Queen') Tag: Reverted
13 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 13:27 −60 Awesome Aasim talk contribs (Undid revision 1295098446 by TweetyBirdIsCoolBoi (talk) — This is unhelpful as this policy states what Wikipedia is not and Wikimedia alternatives for content excluded) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 07:03 −1 Gawaon talk contribs (→Citation style: I think it makes sense to have the two sentences about consistent styles in a single paragraph)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 02:53 +113 Nikkimaria talk contribs (link rfc)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 02:52 −177 Nikkimaria talk contribs (rework)
- diffhist Cambridge University Press 00:44 −5 Absolutiva talk contribs (Changing short description from "Publishing business of the University of Cambridge" to "Publishing arm of the University of Cambridge") Tag: Shortdesc helper
12 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 16:41 0 Gawaon talk contribs (→Citation style: Move sentence into place where it fits better)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 16:39 +208 Gawaon talk contribs (→Citation style: Why was this deleted?? There was a recent RfC leading it its addition (and yes, it the RfC was explicitly and only about capitalization styles))
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 15:08 0 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: Capital) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 15:07 +67 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: We should spell it out, then. If this includes all marks, styles, and capitalizations, let's make it clear for the reader.) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 14:25 −112 Headbomb talk contribs (goes beyond capitalization, includes MOS:CURLY, bolding elements, italics, etc...)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 14:12 +41 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: The following text describes a hybrid: "CS1 uses (in addition to Wikipedia's own Manual of Style) elements of The Chicago Manual of Style and the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, with significant adaptations.") Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 14:07 −24 Gawaon talk contribs (Restored revision 1295226980 by Trumpetrep (talk): Not an improvement, CS1/2 aren't particularly "hybrid" and the old explanation works well enough) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 13:30 +1 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: [) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 13:30 +23 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: It's important to explain in this paragraph that the built-in citation generators use these hybrid styles. Pick the wording that works best, if this isn't it.) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 13:27 −13 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: These are too many thoughts to include in one clear sentence. Especially in a style manual, information should be clearly stated.) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 07:15 +112 Gawaon talk contribs (→Citation style: Clarify that's meant by "style" here based on the recent RfC that led to this addition, to address the concern that this sentence is otherwise unclear)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 04:52 −12 Nikkimaria talk contribs (rv: CS1/CS2 are the most(?) common but not the only citation templates that exist, and the sentence tagged is the result of a recent RfC) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 04:20 −62 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: This sentence serves no purpose. It's important to keep these articles short and to the point.) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 04:03 +19 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: It's important to make it clear that CS1/2 are what the templates use.) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 03:57 +55 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: Clarify this sentence, "Preserving the style of each individual source is not considered an acceptable consistent style.") Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
11 June 2025
- diffhist Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 18:05 +60 TweetyBirdIsCoolBoi talk contribs (→Style and format) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m University of Cambridge 14:28 −9 Martinevans123 talk contribs (others, and others)
- diffhist University of Cambridge 14:25 −83 B6n733ad talk contribs
- diffhist m University of Cambridge 11:21 −17 Favonian talk contribs (Onte padlock too many – but mine respects MOS:ORDER.)
- diffhist University of Cambridge 11:21 −35 Martinevans123 talk contribs (restore stable version) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m University of Cambridge 11:20 +17 Favonian talk contribs (padlock)
- Protection log 11:10 Favonian talk contribs protected University of Cambridge [Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 11:10, 14 June 2025) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 11:10, 14 June 2025) (Persistent disruptive editing: requested at WP:RFPP) (hist)
- diffhist University of Cambridge 10:35 +35 2601:646:a200:e5b0:81b5:e105:1fb7:a5b9 talk (Ican't thank you enough JackDawson; it probably was the scholarly thing and for pegadoical; I was thinking the same thing; just here to help define something already part of a 'good' article. hopefully they lock the page soon and that way none of this senseless bickering can happen again. The vote is clearly 4-3 anyways.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist University of Cambridge 10:30 −44 JackDawson00 talk contribs (crazing over here! this change may just be about scholars from pedagogical. change bishopric church after; they can count, I'm sure. bishopric church was already a part of what was considered a 'good' article; I'm sure these "seasoned" editors can read too; they wouldn't just be following IP edits on articles already considered good for no 'good' reason, now would they? I'm sure they have a legitimate reason as seasoned edits to alter 'good' articles instead of enhance them; I'm sure of it.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist University of Cambridge 10:22 +44 2601:646:a200:e5b0:81b5:e105:1fb7:a5b9 talk (Ican do this all day; the vote is 4-3) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist m University of Cambridge 10:18 −44 Martinevans123 talk contribs (Reverted edit by 2601:646:A200:E5B0:81B5:E105:1FB7:A5B9 (talk) to last version by Godtres) Tags: Rollback Reverted
- diffhist University of Cambridge 10:15 +44 2601:646:a200:e5b0:81b5:e105:1fb7:a5b9 talk (actively the consensus is to define bishopric church; sorry you lost) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist University of Cambridge 07:58 −44 Godtres talk contribs (Undid revision 1295029155 by JackDawson00 (talk). Wikipedia is not a democracy! Consensus is in favour of Ely Cathedral — at least among well-established editors. Do not revert this edit unless the consensus changes on the talk page.) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist University of Cambridge 07:31 +44 JackDawson00 talk contribs (classic democracy bloke; sticking with it based on Talk; don't be a Nazi) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist University of Cambridge 07:02 −44 Jonathan A Jones talk contribs (Restored revision 1294968202 by Godtres (talk): Revert to last good version: please stop making bizarre edits) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted