Related changes

18 June 2025

• diffhist Neutron radiation 21:23 +756 Crmccull000 talk contribs (Added refs.) Tags: Visual edit Newcomer task Newcomer task: references

17 June 2025

• diffhist m Pressurized water reactor 00:29 +1 Avatar317 talk contribs (→History: spelling)

16 June 2025

• diffhist m Molecular dynamics 17:33 +924 Physics therapist talk contribs
• diffhist Gamma ray 15:39 −9 ZergTwo talk contribs (Reverted good faith edits by Quinhonk (talk): If there wasn't a talk page discussion questioning the claims you made in your edit summary, as well as you having a conflict of interest relating to the article, your edit would not have been reverted.) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist m Gamma ray 12:34 +9 Quinhonk talk contribs (If you saw all the discussion in the talk page, you'll see the reason for the minor change. Undid revision 1295808117 by ZergTwo (talk)) Tags: Undo Reverted
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 12:22 +53 Pineapple Storage talk contribs (→Variation in citation methods: adding shortcuts)
• diffhist Gamma ray 02:50 +69 Johnjbarton talk contribs (→Health effects: move Sievert into the article to provide a better See Also)
• diffhist Gamma ray 02:39 +11 Johnjbarton talk contribs (→Risk assessment: Where do these high atomic number particles come from? Oh the study postulated depleted uranium munitions.)
• diffhist Gamma ray 02:33 −49 Johnjbarton talk contribs (→Risk assessment: Change the sentence to focus on the article topic. The source provides no information concerning the relative gamma exposure near nuclear facilities)
• diffhist Gamma ray 00:10 −9 ZergTwo talk contribs (The title is as "inclusive and comprehensive" as it is. Nothing to change there. Undid revision 1295712943 by Quinhonk (talk)) Tags: Undo Reverted

15 June 2025

• diffhist Gamma ray 23:54 −343 ZergTwo talk contribs (One lead image is enough.)
• diffhist Ductility 19:05 +37 David Eppstein talk contribs (Wendelin Wright)
• diffhist m Radiation damage 17:15 +12 Arjayay talk contribs (Missing word added)
• diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 15:54 −7 David Eppstein talk contribs (→Self-published sources: rm redundant "expert" (in sentence that again includes "expert" in better context later) per talk; no change in policy intended)
• diffhist Gamma ray 11:27 +9 Quinhonk talk contribs (→Sources: make the section title more inclusive and comprehensive) Tag: Reverted

14 June 2025

• diffhist Gamma ray 23:14 −47 Johnjbarton talk contribs (→See also: Not closely related) Tag: Manual revert
• diffhist Gamma ray 23:06 −422 Johnjbarton talk contribs (→Risk assessment: Delete image unrelated to article topic. Seems to be an art project, not about gamma rays. Nothing in the source about this topic.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• diffhist Gamma ray 23:05 −351 Johnjbarton talk contribs (→Risk assessment: Delete unacceptable source, see WP:SELFPUB.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Gamma ray 23:02 −176 Johnjbarton talk contribs (Undid revision 1295599161 by Quinhonk (talk) Please provide a source for this claim. The topic is not discussed in the article.) Tags: Undo Reverted
• diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section 22:12 −68 Absolutiva talk contribs (Undid revision 1295619154 by Absolutiva (talk) I'll discuss first) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section 22:09 +68 Absolutiva talk contribs (→Biographies' first sentence: Added another example of Elon Musk's lead) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 21:03 +22 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (Undid revision 1295534514 by Jc3s5h (talk) Good point. How about "corresponds to" instead?)
• diffhist m Gamma ray 19:29 +176 Quinhonk talk contribs (Better explain the fusion aspects of gamma radiation in relation to fission.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist m Gamma ray 19:18 +147 Quinhonk talk contribs (→Risk assessment: and another more constructive reference is also added.) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist m Gamma ray 19:15 +626 Quinhonk talk contribs (Thanks for the advice, and the reference has been updated. Undid revision 1295575226 by Johnjbarton (talk)) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Gamma ray 16:12 −132 Johnjbarton talk contribs (Undid revision 1295515665 by Quinhonk (talk) The claim that this image is related to gamma rays needs to be sourced and explained.) Tags: Undo Reverted
• diffhist Nuclear reactor 13:41 −26 Achmad Rachmani talk contribs (Altered authors 1-1.)
• diffhist Pressurized water reactor 11:58 +8 Dan100 talk contribs (→History: m) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist Pressurized water reactor 11:56 −40 Dan100 talk contribs (→History: Edit) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 10:16 −15 Jc3s5h talk contribs (Undid revision 1295487446 by WhatamIdoing (talk). "Matches" could be understood to mean we must quote exactly, but in reality paraphrases are encouraged.) Tag: Undo
• diffhist Gamma ray 06:40 +132 Quinhonk talk contribs (→Risk assessment) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Gamma ray 06:36 +47 Quinhonk talk contribs (→See also) Tag: Reverted
• diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 02:33 +15 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (We're less concerned about the original source ("comes from") and more about whether the Wikipedia article matches at least one reliable source.) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor

13 June 2025

• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 07:03 −1 Gawaon talk contribs (→Citation style: I think it makes sense to have the two sentences about consistent styles in a single paragraph)
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 02:53 +113 Nikkimaria talk contribs (link rfc)
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 02:52 −177 Nikkimaria talk contribs (rework)

12 June 2025

• diffhist Ductility 22:30 +15 Remsense talk contribs
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 16:41 0 Gawaon talk contribs (→Citation style: Move sentence into place where it fits better)
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 16:39 +208 Gawaon talk contribs (→Citation style: Why was this deleted?? There was a recent RfC leading it its addition (and yes, it the RfC was explicitly and only about capitalization styles))
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 15:08 0 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: Capital) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 15:07 +67 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: We should spell it out, then. If this includes all marks, styles, and capitalizations, let's make it clear for the reader.) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 14:25 −112 Headbomb talk contribs (goes beyond capitalization, includes MOS:CURLY, bolding elements, italics, etc...)
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 14:12 +41 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: The following text describes a hybrid: "CS1 uses (in addition to Wikipedia's own Manual of Style) elements of The Chicago Manual of Style and the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, with significant adaptations.") Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 14:07 −24 Gawaon talk contribs (Restored revision 1295226980 by Trumpetrep (talk): Not an improvement, CS1/2 aren't particularly "hybrid" and the old explanation works well enough) Tags: Twinkle Undo
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 13:30 +1 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: [) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 13:30 +23 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: It's important to explain in this paragraph that the built-in citation generators use these hybrid styles. Pick the wording that works best, if this isn't it.) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 13:27 −13 Trumpetrep talk contribs (→Citation style: These are too many thoughts to include in one clear sentence. Especially in a style manual, information should be clearly stated.) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist m Stress (mechanics) 12:44 +2 Rob Duxk talk contribs (→Cauchy tensor: Changed "imaginary surface" to "theoretical surface" to avoid confusion with complex planes) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 07:15 +112 Gawaon talk contribs (→Citation style: Clarify that's meant by "style" here based on the recent RfC that led to this addition, to address the concern that this sentence is otherwise unclear)
• diffhist Wikipedia:Citing sources 04:52 −12 Nikkimaria talk contribs (rv: CS1/CS2 are the most(?) common but not the only citation templates that exist, and the sentence tagged is the result of a recent RfC) Tag: Manual revert