Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
5 June 2025
4 June 2025
- diffhist m Tom Raworth 21:46 +64 Asadnuces talk contribs (added description and few changes in the line where punctuation was not correct.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Tom Raworth 08:11 +20 Asadnuces talk contribs (Link suggestions feature: 3 links added.) Tags: Visual edit Newcomer task Suggested: add links
2 June 2025
- diffhist m Stanford University 01:02 −4 PassedDown talk contribs (ce) Tag: Visual edit
1 June 2025
- diffhist Sappho 12:28 −140 Michael Aurel talk contribs (Undid revision 1293388377 by Sobek2000 (talk) See WP:DUE and WP:PROPORTION. A primary source on its own isn't sufficient to indicate that this information is particularly relevant or significant to the article's subject; secondary sources are how we determine this.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Sappho 12:21 +140 Sobek2000 talk contribs (Undid revision 1293386023 by UndercoverClassicist (talk) I disagree - as I do not interpret source in article, I only bring iformation. "A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source" . Ovid says she had unnamed daughter - it's descriptive statement) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Sappho 12:10 +4 Caeciliusinhorto talk contribs (ce)
- diffhist Sappho 12:05 −140 UndercoverClassicist talk contribs (Undid revision 1293383942 by Sobek2000 (talk) rv good-faith: see WP:PRIMARY -- needs a secondary source) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App undo
- diffhist Sappho 11:54 +140 Sobek2000 talk contribs (Undid revision 1293381337 by Caeciliusinhorto (talk) It matters, because even if we go with interpretation that Cleis was not her daughter, but a younger lover, Ovid is still evidence of tradition that existed before Suda that she indeed had one daughter, whatever her name was.) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Sappho 11:36 −140 Caeciliusinhorto talk contribs (→Life: true, but why does it matter that Ovid specifically mentions this? Suda and the Oxyrhynchus biography also mention her daughter, and Sappho herself refers to Cleis in two fragments.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m Sappho 11:14 +3 Sobek2000 talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Sappho 11:14 +271 Sobek2000 talk contribs (Since her brothers are mentioned in intro, so should be her presumed daughter.) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Sappho 01:52 +23 98.38.30.162 talk (→Ancient editions: Added link to gloss)