Talk:Bigtable

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reference page number[edit]

The page number for the "page needed" reference in the second section with the quote "better defined as a sparse, distributed multi-dimensional sorted map" is Page 1. I'm not sure how to edit the reference. Hope this helps. --76.21.11.140 (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BigTable Status[edit]

It's completely proprietary and unavailable outside of Google, correct? Could that be mentioned somewhere in the article? -Olegos 20:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


This article probably needs a reference to Mondrian based on Guido's Google Video TechTalk. I'll see if I can't insert a reference somewhere.

Column or row?[edit]

I'm not much on databases, but I think BigTable is row-oriented: the paper says "BigTable maintains data in lexicographic order by row key." --Gwern (contribs) 21:06 5 December 2006 (GMT)

It's column - the column or row distiction is based on how you physically store the data. A traditional database writes each record (ie each row) in one spot. BigTable stores the data for each column together. If you want to read all of the values in a row it will take multiple reads, one for each column group that row uses. --Erik s paulson 19:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization[edit]

I'm looking at the paper, and it seems that they always capitalize it with a lowercase 't', as in Bigtable (which redirects to BigTable). I'm thinking that this is an error that started due to programmers' familiarity with CamelHump notation, as well as the fact that similar Google products (MapReduce) do use CamelHump. If someone who knows more about Wikipedia than I could fix the redirects and the capitalization in the article itself, that would be lovely. (I'd do the capitalization in the article myself, but without the redirect it would just be reverted.) --158.130.63.7 (talk) 02:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree. Just noticed this same thing. Thiseye (talk) 16:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • +1. The references from Google all use a lowercase 't'. Agthorr (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've fixed the article's text, but I need someone with more knowledge to fix the redirects. Jefesaurus (talk) 22:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fixed: Bigtable is canonical; BigTable now redirects to Bigtable.

SQL[edit]

This article is listed on nosql as being a non-relational database. Can anyone confirm this and add this info to the article? --Caue (T | C) 16:38, Friday 2010-08-13 (UTC)

Written in Java (not)[edit]

Not sure what the reference is for the claim for Java as a primary language, but as of 2013 when I left (after 5 years) all of the core infrastructure was in C++ and C++ alone.

Source'ish, the original BigTable paper, which has a few mentions of a C++ API but no mention of Java: http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/bigtable-osdi06.pdf

2601:646:4000:5229:28FB:CB52:D09A:3795 (talk) 16:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bigtable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GFS not defined[edit]

"GFS" is mentioned twice in the article, but it is not defined.

Wmagro (talk) 15:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]