Talk:Motilla del Azuer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Archaeology (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Spain (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 23:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

View of Motilla del Azuer in 2016
View of Motilla del Azuer in 2016

Created by Moonraker (talk). Self-nominated at 06:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC).Reply[reply]

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Article is new enough (created 11/9) and long enough. Earwig detects some overlap with one of the sources, but the copied portion is a direct quote placed in quotation marks and attributed, so not an issue. The hook is short enough, interesting, and supported by inline citation. My Spanish is good enough to say that the hook looks good but not good enough to verify 100%. Photo is excellent and has Creative Commons 2.0 license. QPQ is done. Cbl62 (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the review, Cbl62. I have added above the passage from the source which the hook relies on. I think your point may be about the words “due to”, so I have changed them to “in”. Is that better? Moonraker (talk) 07:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]