Q1: Why does the article refer to the Titanic as "she/her" rather than "it/its"?
A1: Per WP:SHE4SHIPS, the vessel is referred to with feminine pronouns. This is not to be changed without consensus. For discussion of Wikipedia's internal inconsistency and divergence with Encyclopedia Britannica's usage on this point, see Huddleston, Pullum, & Reynolds (2022), A Student's Introduction to English Grammar, 2nd ed., Cambridge: CUP, p. 14-16.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Titanic is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belfast, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the City of Belfast, Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.BelfastWikipedia:WikiProject BelfastTemplate:WikiProject BelfastBelfast-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish Maritime, a collaborative effort to improve and standardise the content and structure of maritime, seafaring and inland waterways articles associated with the island of Ireland. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Irish MaritimeWikipedia:WikiProject Irish MaritimeTemplate:WikiProject Irish MaritimeIrish Maritime
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
The article refers to the ship as "She" when it is, in fact, an inanimate object. If it must be anthropomorphized, no gender can, nor should be, assigned to it arbitrarily. The ship is either an "it" or a "They" 66.23.113.178 (talk) 04:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because she was known to be more faster and not like britannic she was know to travel the world she was gonna be a war ship but not.Rms Is Also A Meaning for "Royal Mail Ship" Royal Means Female in Most Cases.
Not True Because Most Ships Are Refered To As that because have you ever heard someone say luxury and Royal And they dont say male but in warships they say male. Strange
Big battle ships are already retired and obsolete there are carrier strike groups now and they don't include battleships because they are big slow and bulky. 64.184.72.83 (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It should be 1,496 deaths,712 survivors, and 2,208 total passengers.
The inquiries found that the ship seen by Californian was in fact Titanic and that it would have been possible for Californian to aid rescue; therefore, Captain Lord had acted improperly in failing to do so.[
The statement is correct and well footnoted: but it doesn't seem to be noted that, following the discovery of wreck, the position is now known, and not what the enquiry accepted, so the enquiry and 'subsequent arguments' are now seen in a different light. 124.187.219.128 (talk) 07:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose the latter five. I think Sinking of the Titanic or Sinking of RMS Titanic is the usual idiom and I see no reason to add an extra word when one is not required or usual. DrKay (talk) 08:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose all. Titanic is the common name, familiar enough to retain its one-word title. RMS already exists at the first mention, and I'll add the 'RMS' to the infobox caption (which should contain the full name). Randy Kryn (talk) 10:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose with one alteration however Per WP:NC-SHIP. We should not be using the definite article in front of a ship name per WP:NC-SHIP so the article titles with "the" in front of Titanic should be moved to article titles excluding the definite article. So "Wreck of Titanic", "Crew of Titanic" etc. Canterbury Tailtalk13:08, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can't see any reason for this to be inconsistent with all the other ship articles (e.g. RMS Olympic) also the name is ambiguous, Titanic is also the name of a blockbuster film. G-13114 (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And yet if I say "Titanic" in a sentence, most people will think of the actual ship before the film. The ship's popularity exceeds that of the film itself, so it is not a valid argument. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Based off the national geographic"digital twin" it's seeming as though the ship actually sank due to distance rather than catastrophic size. 98.118.242.167 (talk) 18:54, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand the post but the article is already clear that the damage wasn't huge. The article explains this and doesn't imply otherwise. I'm assuming that in "as we first thought", the "we" is referring to people who haven't read the article. I hope that the article helps them. North8000 (talk) 23:55, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Its "maiden" voyage is technically its 3rd voyage. But google says "maiden" is defined as its first trip from launch. Its "launch" is defined as from the construction site, to its first introduction to the water. So titanics "launch" was on april 1st on a test run. Its 2nd voyage was a 26 hour trip from Belfast to South Hampton, and its 3rd voyage was from South Hampton to where it sank on the way to New York. Now, there may have been a ceremonial launch in South Hampton making the first two trips technically not count, but these details need to be added in. JCRobertson88 (talk) 06:42, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maiden voyage is the first trip, in its intended role (i.e., operationally.) Its intended role was as a passenger and mail ship, and its first operational trip was from Southampton. Canterbury Tailtalk11:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That second trip, if true, should probably be added if you have a source. A 26-hour haul is a long trip even if unpassengered. The maiden voyage is still the Atlantic crossing, but the day trip seems notable to add to its full history. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like a source is unneeded, just google titanics trip from Belfast to South Hampton. It was constructed in Belfast, obviously its true, it didnt just warp to south hampton.
And i think there at least should be a side note or in parenthesis that its maiden was technically its third but because of ceremonial reasons it was its maiden voyage 139.60.198.15 (talk) 17:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
These details are already recorded in the Titanic#Sea_trials section. Do you have a reliable source to say it was a 26 hour trip from Belfast, instead of the "about 28 hours" we have in the article? WaggersTALK09:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just nevermind, suddenly you're way off the subject i started with. All i wanted was when i search Titanic's 1st voyage for it to tell me about the trip from belfast because obviously it didnt just warp to Southampton. Unfortunately when i type 1st trip it acts like Belfast doesnt exhist. There should be something in parenthesis there. There should be a separation between its 1st trip and its maiden voyage. Instead i get the same result when typing either maiden or first. I wish it would say somewhere on the internet thats its 1st voyage was not its maiden voyage but it was in belfast. But ai and google and wiki doesnt know the difference. But youre worried about two hours between 26 and 28... holy airball man. Nevermind. 2600:387:F:6EA3:0:0:0:2 (talk) 09:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you think the sea trials section can be made clearer, suggestions are welcome; but all the facts about the pre-maiden voyage journeys are there. WaggersTALK10:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
