Jump to content

Talk:SD card

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Secure Digital)

X Speed Ratings: SLC vs MLC,?

[edit]

Probably, a thing related to speed ratings of SD cards is the SLC vs MLC issue. Although it is almost never mentioned by SD cards distributors, it seems the critical factor impacting access times, write and read speed, as well as the media durability. I'm absolutely not any kind of expert here, I just wanted to give a hint, hoping it's usefull for soemone more knowledgable. I can't say what is the link between 60, 133, 150x etc. ratings and the SLC/MLC, but there is something on here it seems. Or are the MLC not present on the market anymore?

Searching for "slc mlc sd" gives eg. this document: The Samsung SLC NAND Flash Advantage.

Compatibility section

[edit]

I think there should be a separate section on compatibility, e.g. between SD and MMC cards, the issue with 128 GB and larger SD cards, etc.

performance-loss with reformating

[edit]

In SDUC > exFAT filesystem, it is mentioned twice that one can reformat the card. It is however not mentioned that one needs to know the exact specs (like allocation unit size and erase block size) of an SD-Card to do so, or lose up to 50% performance. Said specs are usually not profided by the vendors, even if asked, you have to guess them with flashbench.

SD 7.0 does not support UHS-II/IIIcards

[edit]

SD Express cards cannot support UHS-II interface. SD7. 0 and SD7. 1 define full size SD and microSD form factors using two power supplies, a traditional 3.3 volt and 1.8 volt. 112.104.98.124 (talk) 08:33, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "Relationship between bus modes and card speed classes" section

[edit]

Hi @RickyCourtney. I wanted to discuss your removal of the section I recently added called "Relationship between bus modes and card speed classes" and why you felt "The section seems unnecessary". The text I wrote before the table was a brief version of my thinking of why it was valuable but I can elaborate, although I would like to hear your thinking. Surlyhacker (talk) 21:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand why the section was necessary. Also I wasn't sure what the source was. RickyCourtney (talk) 23:23, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]