Talk:Yangtze

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yangtze. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WHY Yangtze is good[edit]

Yangtze is good because this will be classed as a C for wiki. Hope you enjoyed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.85.57.127 (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Age of yangtze[edit]

When it was build 2409:4063:6EA2:B34D:594F:1737:FEA7:1461 (talk) 06:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yangtze drainage map[edit]

River course shown upriver from Wuhan is a total fantasy. Yangtze River does not flow north to join Han River and continue East to Wuhan. Han And Yangtze rivers join in Wuhan. 2-300 miles of true Yangtze course upriver from Wuhan are not indicated. Unfortunately many sites have adopted and use this incorrect map and credit Wikipedia for it. 66.91.196.246 (talk) 08:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly the map is seriously flawed and urgently needs to be amended or deleted.
The "Map of the Yangtze River drainage basin", which is the second map (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yangtze_River_drainage_basin_map.svg) in the article contains at least one HUGE error. The Han river, which in truth is the biggest tributary of the Yangtze river and joins the Yangtze at Wuhan, is shown wrongly joining the Yangtze at another place over a hundred kilometers to the west.
The article on the Han river, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_River_(Hubei_and_Shaanxi), has a map that shows this correctly, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hanshuirivermap.png and the article about Wuhan, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuhan, says, "Wuhan lies in the eastern Jianghan Plain, at the confluence of the Yangtze river and its largest tributary, the Han River, and is known as "Nine Provinces' Thoroughfare" (九省通衢)." and "The "Golden Waterway" of the Yangtze River and the Han River traverse the urban area and divide Wuhan into the three districts of Wuchang, Hankou, and Hanyang."
By the way, it seems that the "han" in "Wuhan" comes from the "Han" river via "Hankou" city. Polar Apposite (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have a partially completed map I could get around to finishing and uploading. Shannon [ Talk ] 16:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

a stupid question[edit]

I wondered if in

"Ianſu" and "Ianſuchian."

the initial letter was a lowercase l or an uppercase I. My eyes are poor and I was long unable to realize that the fourth letter is not an f, so my attempts to check using a search for Ianf and lanf with ^F failed. Finally I edited the text and extracted the above words. It is possible to check that this f-like letter is really different from f? Well, a good-eyed reader realizes soon that Il is upper-i/lower-l, but ... it is possible to signal to a software-manager that many readers have poot eyes? Thanks for the consideration of these problems. 151.29.133.9 (talk) 23:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]