Template:Admin dashboard

Permanently protected template
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 82
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 45
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 7
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 9
Wikipedia fully-protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 229
Requested RD1 redactions 8
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 6
Open sockpuppet investigations 35
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 4
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 2
Other candidates 3
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 8 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 243 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 9 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Bluey (2018 TV series)

Temporary semi-protection: disruptive edits have resumed after 1yr protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 03:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Marc Garneau

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism issues since Jan 26. —WildComet talk 04:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Rabia Bala Hatun

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Widow99 (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Jack Champion

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated attempts from multiple IPs to add an unsourced birth date to this BLP. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Vinícius Júnior

Reason: Vandalism Sartaj267 07:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing for over two days. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Helal Uddin Ahmed

Reason: High level of vandalism Sartaj267 07:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Qamar Javed Bajwa

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute over the controversy section of the article. I think both parties should have a discussion on the talk page over which particular part of the section do they want to keep or remove but as of now, One party wants to remove the entire controversy section while the other one wants to restore all of it. The constant edit warring is preventing any healthy discussion. The last stable version of the article had the controversy section in it. Razer(talk) 08:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Jimmy Greaves

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be some argument over his goal tally which has caused disruptive edits. Suggest two-weeks protection. Govvy (talk) 10:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

The article might be okay without this, compared to yesterday the disruption has died down. Govvy (talk) 12:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Chung Mong-joon

Reason: Permanent IP vandalism on date of birth Match2015 (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Srpska: The Struggle for Freedom

Reason: IP repeatedly reinserting dubiously sourced material on controversial Serbian film. Partial protection requested. Pincrete (talk) 11:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Kim Petras

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism on the TP. Lard Almighty (talk) 13:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Daniel Ruiz (footballer, born 2001)

Reason: Player under transfer speculation, constant IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 13:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Animal (2023 film)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced information. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Kiara Advani

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High volume disruptions for a recently married celebrity. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Sidharth Malhotra

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High volume disruptions for a recently married celebrity. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 3 months. Adnan (talk) 13:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Err, I guess we both had the same idea. So which one do you prefer, since there could be useful additions from IPs on this one. ElusiveTaker (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake

Temporary pending changes protection: Vandalism, due to the high severity of the disaster, should be PC-Pro'd until It is stable. ElusiveTaker (talk) 14:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Srpska: The Struggle for Freedom

Reason: High level of IP vandalism - contentious topic BobFromBrockley (talk) 14:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

SM City Grand Central

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 14:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

SM City BF Parañaque

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent re-addition of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 14:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Kailash Sirohiya

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yeti Dai (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Alfred Reed

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason getting a lot of vandalism. TartarTorte 15:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
    Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

John Howe (filmmaker)

Reason: Editor (Bearcat) repeatedly deletes page. LJA123 (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Victoria Gowri

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For a couple of months - until the news cycle ends. TrangaBellam (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. TrangaBellam, some of the IPs editing there are actually right. Please check the dates in the article. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

February 26

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

2011

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Vocaloid

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Revolution

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 17:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Wings of Fire (novel series)

Reason: Requesting autoconfirmed edit protection of page "Wings of Fire (novel series)": moderately frequent anonymous edits and vandalism has occured over the years and it seems to be a target for destructive, relativistic and occasionally unencyclopedic behavior from users. May need to be extended protection. ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 17:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Milan Malpensa Airport

Reason: High level of IP vandalisms Riktetta (talk) 17:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Ghanshyam Anuragi

Reason: Persistent vandalism, full page data removed few days back due to vandalism. SocialTheVpm (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Saraiki language

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by IPs/new users since at least December. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Only post below if you receive no (favourable) reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the rolling archive if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Nikki DuBose

Reason: Protected due to a long-inactive sockpuppeteer. Partofthemachine (talk) 02:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Pinging Anachronist as the protecting administrator. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

QWERTY (song)

Reason: This redirect was protected in 2008 and needs updating. Lack of disruption on similar redirects indicates protection is no longer necessary. Peter James (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

  • Comment: Are you sure that protection isn't the reason for the lack of disruption? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Herobrine

Reason: Downgrade from full protection to indefinite extended confirmed protection. Look, I get this always will be an obvious vandalism target (I assume you know why) but I think we can take it down a notch (no pun intended). Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 09:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Is there any legitimate, foreseeable reason for the protection on this redirect to be downgraded? "Because it's been protected for so long" isn't as convincing an argument on a redirect. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Darjeeling

Unprotection: (Remove 'Pending Changes' reduce to 'Semi Protection') This page has been 'pending changes' protected since 2018 for 'Persistent Sockpuppetry.' I don't think this is a valid reason to have 'Pending changes' applied (it's not 'vandalism') and most pending changes reviewers won't be 'checkusers' anyway.


Protecting admin does not appear to be active. JeffUK 10:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

@JeffUK: Semi-protection is an escalation from CRASHlock, not a softening. And provided the article isn't otherwise contraindicated for it sockpuppetry is indeed a valid reason to use CRASHlock, as much as I loathe uttering that sentence. That most reviewers won't be CheckUsers is irrelevant; one doesn't necessarily need that tool to suss out if someone is a sock. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:38, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{request edit}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Kalsi

Kalsi is a pure Tarkhan tribe and again a propoganda is ran by jatt people to save their dipping pride by calling famous clans their.. i would request wikipedia to look into it. Mundaramgarhia (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Not done – You already have an open request at the article talk page – the appropriate venue. It will be dealt with – appropriately. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

7 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Wikipedia:Contact us - Licensing (request) 2023-02-06 10:51 Fully protected (log) Protected by Ironholds on 2012-10-14: "as it was in the past, let it be in the present"
Wikipedia:Contact us - Press (request) 2023-02-06 10:51 Fully protected (log) Protected by Ironholds on 2012-10-14: "as it was in the past, let it be in the present"
Wikipedia:Contact us - Readers (request) 2023-02-06 10:51 Fully protected (log) Protected by Ironholds on 2012-10-14: "as it was in the past, let it be in the present"
Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects (request) 2023-02-06 10:51 Fully protected (log) Protected by Ironholds on 2012-10-14: "as it was in the past, let it be in the present"
Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem (request) 2023-02-06 10:51 Fully protected (log) Protected by Prodego on 2007-11-29: ""
Wikipedia:Contact us/Donations (request) 2023-02-06 10:51 Fully protected (log) Protected by Zzuuzz on 2011-04-22: "High visibility"
User:Community Tech bot/Popular pages config.json (request) 2023-02-07 17:08 User JSON page (log)
Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
9 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Whitelist (request) 2023-01-31 03:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by AmandaNP on 2020-07-24: "Try Template editor per main blacklist page"
Template:Infobox political party (request) 2023-01-31 04:14 Template-protected (log) Modified by Plastikspork on 2016-04-16: "Recent malformed edits"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2023-02-03 11:10 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox university (request) 2023-02-04 16:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Country data Martinique (request) 2023-02-04 22:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2013-10-17: "Not quite high-risk enough now that we have a trusted template editor right."
Template:Uw-vaublock (request) 2023-02-06 02:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-01-04: "Highly visible template: Also used in the interface as a block reason"
Template:Post-nominals/CAN (request) 2023-02-06 23:39 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox building (request) 2023-02-07 04:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-05-08: "Highly visible template: Over 11500 transclusions. Increasing protection to template editor."
Template:Infobox musical composition (request) 2023-02-07 06:24 Template-protected (log) Modified by RexxS on 2020-08-08: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

User:Qwerty284651

I will be creating several tennis draw pages in the upcoming weeks and would like to acquire the autopatrolled user right, so there'll be no need for a page reviewer reviewing the newly created pages as they will be marked as "patrolled" by default. Qwerty284651 (talk) 03:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

 Not done One of your articles was draftified just the other day. You need to make sure your articles establish notability and are properly sourced before you put them in the mainspace. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
@HJ Mitchell:, I did. Take another look. Trust me, I am well acquainted with WP:VERIFY. Qwerty284651 (talk) 19:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Qwerty284651, my advice is that you create articles in draft space and move them into mainspace when they are ready. This is exactly what the next editor who comes along may draftify. Schwede66 03:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Qwerty284651, several of your articles contain empty tables or sections (for future use, I presume). These should be in Draft form until you can fill those tables with scores, or what have you. Articles with empty tables or sections look incomplete to our readers, and are of little informational value until complete. GenQuest "scribble" 08:58, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
@GenQuest, only 1 of my article contains empty tables/sections, not several. Yes, upon creation they're empty, but I do finish the articles I start. Qwerty284651 (talk) 13:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
If you were to agree on creating your articles in draft space from now on in response to the comments above, I would assess your work. And I’m sure HJ Mitchell would concur should the resulting outcome support the granting of autopatrolled as draftification would no longer occur. Schwede66 15:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
@Schwede66, I concur. Qwerty284651 (talk) 16:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

User:LordVoldemort728

I have created more than 350 pages. Many of them are created through WP:AfC. I can understand WP:GNG. I know many articles which are created by me are stubs but they all are notable. I requested for this permission on 9 November 2022 but User:TheSandDoctor denied my request and said me for "focusing on quality over quantity" and also said "Feel free to apply again in future (perhaps 3-6 months? Just a suggested time frame, not binding.) when you have addressed concerns and improved practices.". Today I have improved that type of mistakes. Now days I publish articles through WP:AfC and I have also enhanced it's quality. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 17:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 18:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser


User:98Tigerius

I've been using lots of scripts to edit easier and faster and I think AWB will help me more to contribute in updating and editing articles. 98Tigerius (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

@98Tigerius: can you be more specific about the types of updates/edits you'd like to make? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 Not done, no reply in a week. Primefac (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

User:JustDoggo2onYT

id like to help with link swaps. I'm knowledgeable on awb and have made over 13000 by-hand awb edits without having access to the bot tab over at Nukapedia - FreshYoMama (talk) 08:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has approximately 12 non-automated edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 08:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 Not done, user only has 28 edits. Primefac (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Young Lecturer

Hello all, my reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights is that I am editing a lot of pages with DAB links, I, therefore, wanted to make my edits easier and faster. Thank you. Young Lecturer (talk) 03:31, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

User:Red-tailed sock

Legitimate alternate account of User:Red-tailed hawk. Currently <10 edits on this account, but I would like to use IAManagementConsole and I need to be confirmed to do that. — Red-tailed sock (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 07:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Can confirm that this is my alt. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 Done Salvio giuliano 08:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

User:FrozHop

this is my alternate account and want EC for edit every articles. Thanks :-) FrozHop (talk) 20:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

 Not done – we have no evidence that you are Soniah110. — JJMC89(T·C) 20:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Red-tailed sock

I'd like to use this account for IAManagementConsole and editing on less-secure devices going forward. Red-tailed sock (talk) 07:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC) Red-tailed sock (talk) 07:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Above account is mine. Publicly-declared legitimate alt. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 Done Salvio giuliano 08:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Requests for event coordinator

Event coordinator

User:Atibrarian

Hi! I am humbly requesting for Event Coordinator's rights to enable me to create multiple accounts for attendees in an outreachy (RWiC program) being implemented by me and other team members. We are currently in the second phase of the training which will require the participants to create account on en Wikipedia, be familiar with the interface and basics of Wikipedia. Furthermore, the issues of open proxy and IP block have not been good experiences for newbies judging from past experiences. Thanks for your time and consideration. Regards. R Atibrarian (talk) 04:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 04:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Could you please provide a link to the page about the outreach program you are participating in, as I'm not familiar with it? Salvio giuliano 08:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Salvio giuliano!
Kindly use this
link to the program's meta page. Regards. Atibrarian (talk) 16:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. According to this page, I see that this program is supposed to run until the end of February, so I am about to grant you this user right until then. If you still need it afterwards, feel free to ask again and it will be extended. Cheers. Salvio giuliano 17:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 Done Salvio giuliano 17:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you @Salvio giuliano. I will keep you posted. Regards. Atibrarian (talk) 20:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

User:LordVoldemort728

I am a Participant for WikiProject Articles for creation and I want to get this permission for reviewing accepted articles from AfC and also for patrolling newly created articles.

My account meets all criteria for becoming New Page Reviewer.

  • I am registered with Wikipedia for more than 11 months and 11 days.
  • Have edited more than 12,900 times in Wikipedia.
  • I am active in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and Wikipedia:Articles for creation.
  • I have a have a solid history that demonstrate proficiency with communicating and interacting with new users, and in a positive, civil, helpful, and appropriate manner.
  • I have experience for moving pages according to guidelines.
  • My account hasn't been blocked from the starting of my account creation.
  • I will must review pages on a volunteer basis.

I requested for this permission on 28 December 2022 but User:Rosguill declined it some AfC submissions declined and wrote "Thank you for your extensive contributions to Wikipedia thus far. However, I'm concerned that multiple different editors have all reached out to you to caution you about rushing through edits in the past two months, and that you have had some AfC article submissions declined during this time period. Not done for now" ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 17:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 17:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Ppt91

I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for over two years now and have over 2,000 edits, the vast majority of which are in main space. I have extensive experience in the use of proper citations and secondary reliable sources as well as Wikipedia's notability guidelines, very good working knowledge of page assessment levels (evident in my edit history that includes one GA in addition to multiple B-class, C-class, and start-class), and am familiar with policies concerning new page creation (I've created at least seven main space articles) and page moving proces. Moreover, I am always civil and courteous when engaging with other users and routinely offer my help to new editors. The only area where my experience isn't as extensive is with AfD, PROD, CSD, and AfC, although I believe that my familiarity with the process is sufficient for new page reviewer. Thank you very much for considering my request. Ppt91 (talk) 02:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

I also wanted to specify that, due to my educational background and my professional experience, my work as a new page reviewer will be particularly valuable on articles for WP:VISUALARTS which would surely benefit from a more consistent oversight and editorial commitment. Thanks again. Ppt91 (talk) 23:16, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Eejit43

Hello!

I'm requested the new page reviewer right to help sort through the immense backlog, especially redirects- of which there are currently about 7,300! While I don't usually focus on writing articles, I'm an AfC reviewer, and am very familiar with naming conventions, BLP policies, copyright policies, etc. I also frequently tag various issues on articles, nominate articles for deletion, and draftify articles. I meet all the NPP reviewer requirements, and, if granted, would use this tool responsibly. Thanks! Face-smile.svg ~ Eejit43 (talk) 01:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover


User:Reading Beans

I'm a new page reviewer, and would appreciate the ability to draftify articles without leaving a redirect behind. Reading Beans (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 18:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
@Reading Beans: your previous request was declined because of concerns about DRAFTOBJECT etc. Please could you elaborate on how you would approach that issue if granted this right? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
@HJ Mitchell, didn't know you had replied this.
If the last request was declined for DRAFTOBJECT reasons then I think the administrator did not understand my point clearly.
I'm actually requesting for the user right to be able to move pages back to draft space or renaming articles.
During NPP, most users move articles from draft space to main space when they're not ready, some, create double articles; one in draftspace and one in main space.
Tagging for speedy is most times very tricky, so I'll end up skipping a junk in the main space, clustering the backlog.
The other, a page may be moved from the COMMONNAME to say, a full name, and I wouldn't be able to perform a round-robin during NPP. IDK if I've explained my self enough.
About DRAFTOBJECT. If an article was moved to mainspace after being draftified, I usually clean the article up (if I'm familiar with the subject) or leave it entirely. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Reading Beans (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
@Reading Beans: I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying that you won't use this permission to move articles back to draft space if the draftification is contested? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
@HJ Mitchell, yes. That’s what I’m trying to say. Reading Beans (talk) 17:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

User:PritongKandule

I have been editing Wikipedia on and off since 2008, with over 2,700 edits as of writing. My contributions log should demonstrate extensive experience in patrolling the Recent Changes log especially in spotting and reverting vandalism (including subtle/unobvious ones), BLP violations, unsourced controversial content, spam, and other inappropriate content. I would like to request permission to review pending changes as I encounter them quite often in the log. I have also familiarized myself with all the requisite policies on content, reviewing, and on copyright. Thanks! PritongKandule-✉️📝 13:50, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done DanCherek (talk) 15:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

User:Estopedist1

Rollbacking option saves my time against vandals, and also enables "restore" option. Already admin at Wikidata. Trust guaranteed Estopedist1 (talk) 07:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Heavy Water

I joined Wikipedia on April 1, 2020, am extended-confirmed, and have made 2,275 mainspace edits since then. Especially over the last year, I have frequented recent changes to revert vandalism, always leaving warnings and making AIV reports when necessary. I have never taken part in an edit war, I have never been blocked, and I have read WP:Rollback. I understand I am not to use rollback except when reverting obvious vandalism. Thank you, Heavy Water (talk) 17:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

User:CastJared

Hello, I do use Twinkle and RedWarn to revert edits and use rollback edits, so I do have to try rollback edits if I see suspected vandalism or edit disruption. CastJared (talk) 10:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

 Not done You have barely a dozen edits with Twinkle and RedWarn (combined) so far. That's not enough of a track record for me to make a decision yet. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Firefly115

I was told on my Talk page that there are more efficient ways of reverting multiple acts of vandalism on an article. Given that I revert vandalism a lot, this interested me so I started reading the article he/she/they linked and noticed the Rollback permission. I have reverted quite a bit of vandalism on Wikipedia and think this would help make my job easier and will reduce clutter the history section of the page in question. Thank you!

Firefly115 (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2023 (UTC) Firefly115 (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

User:PritongKandule

I have been editing Wikipedia on and off since 2008, with more than 2,500 edits since. I usually dedicate an hour a day keeping watch on Recent Changes, filtering through the bottom of the unreverted edits list to check for vandalism that were missed or too subtle to notice at first. My history of using RedWarn/Twinkle to fight vandalism, warn users, and report serious troublemakers should speak for itself, and having rollback permissions would help make me more efficient. Thanks! PritongKandule-✉️📝 07:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Bharel

Signed up for the CVU 😊. Former Administrator and Interface Administrator (elected, finished my 3 years term in good standing) at the Hebrew Wikipedia, over 16k edits and are a current patroller there. Fell in love with RedWarn so I'm here for a ride. Bar Harel (talk) 16:50, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 157 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 17:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
I disagree with Mr. Bot. It is factually incorrect and deserves a {{uw-error1}} 😉 Bar Harel (talk) 20:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

User:ThethPunjabi

I often encounter vandalism or uncited edits on articles related to Sikhism and Punjab. Having the rollback function will save me a lot of time when reverting such edits from problematic users. ThethPunjabi (talk) 05:26, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Riverbend21

I spend a decent amount of my time on Wikipedia, patrolling "Recent changes", reverting vandalism, and the like, using RedWarn for the most part; I request the "Rollback" right for the sake of convenience. Thank you. Riverbend21 (talk) 12:49, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Alalch E.

I use Ultraviolet and Twinkle, but I had also done RCP for a while without any gadgets. I read somewhere in UV's instructions that using it with rollback makes it execute faster; subjectively, it does feel a little slow currently. I send appropriate notices and warnings to users, and have endeavored to add a summary to my pseudo-rollbacks when it's technically possible. I have this user right on a different language version so I'm also familiar with how it works without any gadgets. —Alalch E. 18:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

User:Voidxor

Hello! I have a well established history of working in the Template namespace. I've also submitted several edit requests for protected modules and templates, and feel I would be able to do more for Wikipedia if able to edit protected templates (with discussion or sandbox testing as appropriate or required, of course). — voidxor 21:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~34k)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1000)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 1 (significant))
Primefac (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
I am leaning towards a decline for lack of need, primarily because the edit requests in question were relatively simply/trivial requests (and were all almost a decade ago). Will leave open for now for other thoughts. Primefac (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm trying to get back into it. I've since seen a lot of needed minor edits, such as grammar, but just passed it up upon seeing template protection. So we're going to discount the minor stuff (such as this)? That's kind of a shame because that's where I could help most. Otherwise, I will need to continue to make edit requests, which in turn won't be counted here. I don't catch major errors in templates or modules all that often (Wikipedia being more stable and quiescent these days), but I certainly would sandbox and seek consensus when it's a highly used template. Another space I might like to get involved more is improving consistency in infobox parameters. — voidxor 16:34, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Please see the above checklists. Edit requests and sandbox edits are explicitly counted here, and they are the things that you came up short on. Template editors can seriously break thousands of pages with a single edit (ask me how I know), so it is not a permission granted lightly. We would like to see some significant sandbox coding examples, preferably in conjunction with edits to testcases pages that show you are considering the ramifications of your edits. To give one example, something I worked on yesterday, here's a series of edits (with a lot of mistakes!) that I performed in a template sandbox to add an if statement and some non-trivial URLs, along with some updated formatting, to a template that is used on a few hundred pages. I tested it carefully after each edit to find and fix mistakes before applying my changes to the live template, potentially breaking 350 pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)